This parable serves as a central teaching on judgment and the distinction between the righteous and the unrighteous.
The concept of God as ‘all-loving’ is prevalent in theology.
Aquinas suggests that divine attributes are not merely human definitions but reflections of God’s nature.
Divine attributes are essentially simple and unified, not fragmented qualities; they are God’s nature.
Humans can understand them as they reflect their experience of virtues, yet God surpasses human concepts.
This understanding promotes the notion that while we strive to describe God, our definitions will inherently fall short.
The Son of Man will come in glory for judgment.
Individuals will be divided into two groups: sheep (righteous) and goats (unrighteous).
Righteous individuals (sheep) will inherit the kingdom prepared for them.
The unrighteous (goats) will be condemned to eternal punishment in the fire prepared for the devil.
Judgment is portrayed as unavoidable and has eternal consequences.
The parable emphasizes the certainty of divine judgment.
It underscores the finality and eternity of the consequences of one’s actions during life.
The narrative underlines an important theological principle: both reward and punishment are everlasting.
The Gospel of Matthew was written within a Jewish community, deeply grounding its teachings in Jewish tradition.
Jewish beliefs associate righteousness with adherence to the Torah (Law) given to the Israelites.
Matthew redefines righteousness to include acts of compassion:
Feeding the hungry
Welcoming strangers
Visiting the sick
Righteousness is thus interpreted not only through adherence to laws but also through loving and serving others, highlighting a relational aspect of faith.
This interpretation stresses that true piety is demonstrated through active love and concern for one’s neighbors.