GR

Antibiotic Resistance Patterns of Serratia marcescens

Introduction
  • Study on antibiotic resistance patterns of clinical isolates of Serratia marcescens.

  • Conducted by Robert C. Cooksey, Edward R. Bannister, and W. Edmund Farrar, Jr. at the Medical University of South Carolina.

  • 102 strains isolated from three medical centers; analyzed using disk sensitivity and agar dilution methods.

Key Findings on Antibiotic Resistance
  • Least resistance observed against:

    • Gentamicin

    • Nalidixic acid

    • Chloramphenicol

    • Sulfisoxazole

    • All inhibited more than 80% of strains.

  • Total resistance:

    • Cephalothin was completely ineffective (100% resistance).

    • Ampicillin and Tetracycline had over 90% resistance.

  • Effective drugs recognized (demonstrated by minimum inhibitory concentration):

    • Nalidixic acid

    • Gentamicin

    • Tobramycin

    • Chloramphenicol

    • Inhibitory concentrations achieved fall within therapeutically attainable levels.

Patterns of Resistance
  • Uniformity of resistance against ampicillin, cephalothin, and tetracycline across three hospitals.

  • Hospital-specific patterns noted for other antibiotics.

  • 11 isolates were pigmented, resistant to multiple drugs, similar resistance patterns with nonpigmented strains.

  • Multiple drug resistance:

    • 50% of strains were resistant to five or more antibiotics.

  • Problems associated with hospital infections include:

    • Meningitis

    • Pulmonary infections

    • Septicemia

    • Endocarditis

Antibiotic Efficacy and MIC Results
  • Table 1 shows resistance percentages for various strains:

    • All strains: 100% resistant to Cephalothin.

    • 93% resistance to Ampicillin and Tetracycline.

    • Resistance rates for others (e.g., 14% for Gentamicin, 8% for Nalidixic acid).

  • Resistance varied by hospital:

    • M. D. Anderson Hospital: more resistant across all tested drugs (except colistin & cephalothin).

    • Emory University: higher resistance to colistin.

  • Notable findings on pigmented strains:

    • Resistant to Streptomycin, Colistin, and Tobramycin.

Discussion Points
  • Gentamicin, chloramphenicol, sulfisoxazole, and nalidixic acid remain the most effective agents against Serratia at therapeutic doses.

  • Ineffective agents:

    • Ampicillin, cephalothin, tetracycline, and colistin showed no efficacy and should not be used for treatment.

  • Characteristic resistance patterns suggest ongoing evaluation of antibiotic susceptibility is needed due to:

    • Rapid development of resistance.

    • Changes over short periods of time.

  • R factors:

    • Transferable resistance among strains contributing to increased resistance to selected antibiotics.

Acknowledgments
  • Thanks to Dieter Groschel and Jonas Shulman for bacterial strains provided for study.

Conclusion
  • The ongoing study of antibiotic resistance patterns in S. marcescens is crucial given the organism's opportunistic nature and rapid adaptability in clinical settings.

  • Study on antibiotic resistance patterns of clinical isolates of Serratia marcescens.

  • Conducted by Robert C. Cooksey, Edward R. Bannister, and W. Edmund Farrar, Jr. at the Medical University of South Carolina.

  • 102 strains isolated from three medical centers; analyzed using disk sensitivity and agar dilution methods.

Key Findings on Antibiotic Resistance
  • Least resistance observed against:- Gentamicin

    • Nalidixic acid

    • Chloramphenicol

    • Sulfisoxazole

    • All inhibited more than 80% of strains.

  • Total resistance:- Cephalothin was completely ineffective (100% resistance).

    • Ampicillin and Tetracycline had over 90% resistance.

  • Effective drugs recognized (demonstrated by minimum inhibitory concentration):- Nalidixic acid

    • Gentamicin

    • Tobramycin

    • Chloramphenicol

    • Inhibitory concentrations achieved fall within therapeutically attainable levels.

Patterns of Resistance
  • Uniformity of resistance against ampicillin, cephalothin, and tetracycline across three hospitals.

  • Hospital-specific patterns noted for other antibiotics.

  • 11 isolates were pigmented, resistant to multiple drugs, similar resistance patterns with nonpigmented strains.

  • Multiple drug resistance:- 50% of strains were resistant to five or more antibiotics.

  • Problems associated with hospital infections include:- Meningitis

    • Pulmonary infections

    • Septicemia

    • Endocarditis

Antibiotic Efficacy and MIC Results
  • Table 1 shows resistance percentages for various strains:- All strains: 100% resistant to Cephalothin.

    • 93% resistance to Ampicillin and Tetracycline.

    • Resistance rates for others (e.g., 14% for Gentamicin, 8% for Nalidixic acid).

  • Resistance varied by hospital:- M. D. Anderson Hospital: more resistant across all tested drugs (except colistin & cephalothin).

    • Emory University: higher resistance to colistin.

  • Notable findings on pigmented strains:- Resistant to Streptomycin, Colistin, and Tobramycin.

Discussion Points
  • Gentamicin, chloramphenicol, sulfisoxazole, and nalidixic acid remain the most effective agents against Serratia at therapeutic doses.

  • Ineffective agents:- Ampicillin, cephalothin, tetracycline, and colistin showed no efficacy and should not be used for treatment.

  • Characteristic resistance patterns suggest ongoing evaluation of antibiotic susceptibility is needed due to:- Rapid development of resistance.

    • Changes over short periods of time.

  • R factors:- Transferable resistance among strains contributing to increased resistance to selected antibiotics.

Acknowledgments
  • Thanks to Dieter Groschel and Jonas Shulman for bacterial strains provided for study.

Conclusion
  • The ongoing study of antibiotic resistance patterns in S. marcescens is crucial given the organism's opportunistic nature and rapid adaptability in clinical settings.

Cooksey, R. C., Bannister, E. R., & Farrar, W. E. (1975). Study on antibiotic resistance patterns of clinical isolates of *Serratia marcescens*. *Medical University of South Carolina*, Volume XX, Issue YY, Location: Charleston, SC.