Welcome back to Smart Reads, celebrating the anniversary of autonomy: "Otoño."
Presenting ideas from Neil Postman's book "Technopolis" (1992).
Mention of Patrick Wood's "Technocracy Rising," seen as conspiratorial.
Emphasis on contrasting established thoughts and alternative narratives.
Neil Postman's insights on the dangers of technocracy in the U.S.
Describes it as a system where technology dominates social institutions, becoming sovereign and self-justifying.
The historical shift of technology from cultural support to creating totalitarian order.
Technology's influence on redefining core concepts:
Religion, art, family, politics, history, truth, privacy, intelligence.
Alternative living and belief systems become invisible and irrelevant.
Technology is essential but should be controlled by human needs, social values, and national intentions.
In Technopolis:
Individuality is undermined, freedom is compromised.
True democracy uses technical skills to support human endeavors.
Discussion aims to unpack quotes and foster dialogue for deeper understanding.
Contrasting engagement levels:
Some struggle with attention span while others grasp complex ideas quickly.
The aim is to enhance interaction through questions and sharing insights.
Reading and Writing
Postman questions the benefits of reading and writing as integrated into human consciousness.
literacy equated with a form of slavery without critical thinking.
Chapter 1:
Examines the historical skepticism surrounding writing's impact on memory and wisdom, exemplified by the story of Thamus and Thoth.
Writing can diminish memory and lead to a false sense of wisdom.
Technologies have mixed effects; every invention is both a blessing and a burden.
Society's transition from oral traditions to technologically-driven narratives.
How technology influences cultural memory and societal structure:
Presenting the balance between benefits and drawbacks of technological evolution.
Discussion on how past technologies like the steam engine required societal adaptation and consciousness.
Postman cautions against uncritical acceptance of technology, likening technophiles to naïve enthusiasts for new advancements.
Critique of the tendency to favor efficiency over human judgment and values.
Citing Karl Marx on technologies and perceptions of reality.
Resistance comes from:
Individuals questioning the purpose of efficiency in human relations.
Maintaining connections to the past and valuing traditional structures.
Critical thinkers who do not correlate progress with technological advancement.
Those who unplug from technological norms and maintain human-centric approaches to life are seen as the resistance fighters in a technocratic age.
Discussion highlights the importance of retaining human interactions amidst technological advances.
Reflection on potential ramifications of not questioning the increasingly rapid adoption of technology.
The conversation touches on classroom learning, technology in administration, and the systemic implications of bureaucracy.
Closing thoughts emphasize the need for critical engagement with technology.
Encouragement for deeper understanding and retaining human values.
Final reflections advocate for leveraging technology for meaningful human interactions rather than replacing them.
Invitation to think critically, question, and derive personal insights before adopting new technologies.