HST 113 Oct 16
Experimentation and Inoculation Insights
Prisoners and Experimentation
Smallpox does not work with animals.
Unable to run animal tests leads to ethical experimentation on human subjects.
Elizabeth Harrison fulfills her contractual obligations but faces additional demands from the experimenters.
Initial freedom was granted for her participation; however, further would require observing whether she contracts smallpox.
Reasons for selecting Elizabeth over John:
Considerations about gender dynamics in society.
Richard's refusal to participate would be respected more than Elizabeth's due to societal norms regarding gender.
Elizabeth's outcome: she does not contract the disease after exposure.
Role of Princess Caroline
Caroline desires her children to be inoculated.
The Newgate Experiment involved adult prisoners rather than children.
Benevolent appearance:
She funds the inoculation of all children in an orphanage to portray a caring image.
Use of Orphans in Experiments
Choice for experimentation lies in their lack of legal guardians or advocates.
Vulnerability of orphans makes them easier subjects for testing vaccine safety, perpetuating a cycle of exploitation.
Impact of Inoculation Practices
Financial implications of inoculation: Physicians profit not by inoculating but by selling scabs of infected individuals.
Boston's smallpox epidemics convey the high mortality rates experienced during these outbreaks (circa 1721).
Cotton Mather's Role in Inoculation
Cotton Mather, a religious minister, advocates for inoculation after learning from his enslaved worker Onesimus about African practices.
Collaborates with physician Zabdiel Boylston to implement inoculation procedures.
The significance of Mather:
Uses scientific evidence to back his arguments for inoculation despite opposition from fellow clergy and physicians.
William Douglas, MD
Skepticism towards inoculation due to beliefs in natural preventative measures and divine intervention.
Ironic