Article III of the US Constitution
Section 1: Establishes a Supreme Court and Inferior Courts as allowed by Congress. Judges serve during 'Good Behavior,' potentially for life.
Section 2: Outlines case types courts may hear, differentiating between Original and Appellate Jurisdiction.
Section 3: Defines treason charges.
The structure leaves substantial aspects up to interpretation.
Initially regarded as the weakest branch of government.
Federalist Essay #78 by Hamilton discusses the judiciary's limited power compared to the executive and legislative branches.
Judiciary Act of 1789 established the federal court system and included a three-tier system with at least one District Court in every state.
Original Jurisdiction: Cases heard first by the Supreme Court are rare (1-3% of cases).
Examples include disputes between states, cases involving diplomats, and cases between states and citizens of other states initiated by the state.
Appellate Jurisdiction: Most Supreme Court cases (97-99%) come from appeals.
Appeals can come from U.S Courts of Appeals, highest state courts (federal questions), and military appeals.
Court Hierarchy:
U.S. Supreme Court: Usually hears 75-90 cases per term.
U.S. Courts of Appeals: 13 courts, 60,000 cases/year, no original jurisdiction; hear appeals from lower federal courts, U.S. regulatory commissions, and legislative courts.
U.S. District Courts: 94 courts, 350,000 cases/year, no appellate jurisdiction; handle cases involving federal government, civil suits under federal law, and more.
State Courts: Include State Trial Courts and State Intermediate Appellate Courts handling significant case volumes.
Boundaries established to manage the federal judicial system, with various districts across states for proper jurisdiction.
Hamilton's Position: The judiciary is least dangerous to political rights, operating without economic or military power; relies on executive enforcement.
Brutus' View: Judges are independent, free from control by other government powers, potentially leading to judicial overreach.
Hamilton's Argument: Judicial permanence rooted in the complexity of law, with few appropriately qualified individuals available.
The concept of Good Behavior as tenure for judicial offices was promoted in the Constitutional Convention.
First Chief Justice (1789-1795); led the Chisholm v. Georgia case, affecting state immunity in federal courts.
Under Chief Justice John Marshall (1801-1835), seminal cases like Marbury v. Madison established judicial review, strengthening the judiciary.
Political shift post-Election of 1800 saw Federalists, including Marshall, filling judicial positions through the Judiciary Act of 1801.
Marbury's unfulfilled appointment leads to a Supreme Court suit against Madison, establishing the concept of judicial review despite initial weaknesses for the court.
Significant impact on shaping judicial authority through landmark cases:
Marbury v. Madison: Introduced judicial review.
McCulloch v. Maryland: Established the supremacy of federal law.
Gibbons v. Ogden: Expanded commerce regulation authority.
Various justices have left marks in U.S. judicial history:
Roger Taney: Known for the Dred Scott case.
Earl Warren: Advocated for the rights of the accused.
Sandra Day O’Connor: First female associate justice.
Thurgood Marshall: First African-American justice.
Confirmation Process:
Includes vetting and investigation, with significant influence from interest groups.
Increased scrutiny in Senate committee hearings since the 1980s.
Appointments to the Supreme Court carry major implications and unpredictability.
Approaches to constitutional interpretation:
Strict Constructionist/Originalist: Adheres closely to the original text and intent.
Living Document: Believes that the Constitution's interpretation can evolve over time.
Differing roles of courts:
Judicial Activism: Courts make decisions addressing current societal needs.
Judicial Restraint: Courts primarily rely on precedent in their decisions.
Deciding Cases:
Supreme Court hears about 1% of cases filed.
Must issue a writ of certiorari which requires agreement from four justices (Rule of Four).
Decision-Making Process:
Court hears cases between October and late June/July, with various opinions established in verdicts:
Majority Opinion: Represents majority agreement.
Concurring Opinion: Agrees with the outcome but offers different reasoning.
Dissenting Opinion: Expresses disagreement with the majority view, affecting future precedents.
Section 1: Establishes the Supreme Court and allows Congress to create inferior courts. Judges serve for life under "good behavior."
Section 2: Defines jurisdiction:
Original Jurisdiction: Cases the Supreme Court hears first.
Appellate Jurisdiction: Cases appealed from lower courts.
Section 3: Outlines treason definitions and charges.
Initially regarded as the weakest branch (Federalist #78 by Hamilton).
Judiciary Act of 1789: Established the current court system with a Three-tier system: District Courts → Courts of Appeals → Supreme Court.
Hamilton (Federalist #78): The judiciary possesses "no FORCE nor WILL, but merely judgment."
Brutus #15 (Yates): Warned that judges could potentially become too independent and powerful.
Marbury v. Madison (1803): Established Judicial Review (the power to declare laws unconstitutional).
McCulloch v. Maryland (1819): Upheld federal authority through the Supremacy and Necessary and Proper Clauses.
Gibbons v. Ogden (1824): Expanded federal power under the Commerce Clause.
John Marshall: Strengthened the judiciary with Judicial Review.
Roger Taney: Known for the Dred Scott decision.
Earl Warren: Landmark cases like Brown v. Board and Miranda rights.
Sandra Day O’Connor: First female Justice.
Thurgood Marshall: First African American Justice.
John Roberts: Current Chief Justice.
Process: Nomination → Vetting → Senate Hearings → Confirmation.
Influenced strongly by political ideologies and interest groups.
"Getting Borked": Referencing contentious nomination battles.
Strict Constructionist/Originalist: Emphasizes the Constitution’s original intent.
Living Document: Views the Constitution as adaptable to modern societal needs.
Judicial Activism: Courts take an active role in shaping policy through their rulings.
Judicial Restraint: Prioritizes adhering to precedent (stare decisis).
The Supreme Court hears approximately 1% of cases through writ of certiorari (Rule of Four: 4 Justices must agree).
Types of Opinions Issued:
Majority Opinion: Sets legal precedent.
Concurring Opinion: Agrees with the decision but presents different reasoning.
Dissenting Opinion: Voices disagreement with the majority ruling.
Is the Supreme Court too powerful?
Are lifetime appointments beneficial?
Is the Court truly above politics?