envi sci quiz 1

QUIZ 1 Class Notes

  • Human population growing exponentially ::   * it might level off, or it might crash.

Poverty affects people + how they interact w/ environment: gap between rich + poor countries

  • ^^highly developed countries (HDCs)::^^   * more   * more energy production + usage   * more industrialization   * less agriculture   * service industry dominates   * more international trade   * more urbanization   * more technology
  • ^^moderately developed countries (MDCs)::^^   * somewhere between HDC/LDC
  • ^^less developed countries (LDCs)::^^   * less   * less energy production + usage   * less industrialization   * more agriculture   * production of goods dominates   * less international trade   * less urbanization   * less technology
  • overpopulation vs. overconsumption   * ^^overpopulation::^^     * “too many” people     * tends to be in LDCs   * ^^overconsumption::^^     * people using “too many” resources     * tends to be in HDCs
  • types of resources   * ^^potentially renewable^^ :: resources that replenish naturally in a reasonable amount of time for humans     * ex: clean water, clean air, soil, living things   * ^^nonrenewable^^ :: resources that don’t replenish naturally or take too long to do so     * ex: fossil fuels, metals (aluminum, uranium, etc.)   * ^^perpetual^^ :: resources that are always available     * ex: sunlight, tides (controlled by moon), wind + waves (controlled by sun)
  • how scientists measure effects of humans on the environment   * ^^ecological footprint^^ :: how our resource use + waste production affect land (how much land is needed to provide resources + absorb/deal with waste)     * could be per person, for country/region, for whole world   * ^^IPAT model^^ :: looking at whole population’s environmental impact     * I = P x A x T       * I = environmental impact       * P = population size (# of people)       * A = affluence (resources consumed per person)       * T = technology (environmental impacts of tech could be good or bad)       * Direct relationships:         * P up, I up         * P down, I down         * A up, I up         * A down, I down         * T: it depends
  • environmental sustainability   * ^^environmental sustainability^^ :: ability to meet current needs without compromising ability to meet future needs   * ^^Tragedy of the Commons^^ :: people don’t take good care of a common resource because they prioritize their own short-term interests     * Tend to take better care of privately owned resources     * Short-term needs take priority over long-term consequences     * Environmentally: land, water, air, etc.   * ^^sustainable development^^ :: economic progress that considers environmental impact (is sustainable)   * ^^true sustainability ::^^ a compromise between 3 things:     * environmental issues     * economic issues     * social issues
  • ideas about how we should use/view the environment   * preservation vs. conservation     * about land use     * ^^preservation^^ :: belief in not using or minimally using natural land, keeping it pristine     * ^^conservation^^ :: belief in using natural land carefully so humans can keep using it   * environmental worldviews--on spectrums     * frontier ethic vs. environmental ethic       * ^^frontier ethic::^^ earth has unlimited resources (or we can replace them) for human use       * ^^environmental ethic::^^ resources can run out, humans just part of nature     * anthropocentric vs. biocentric       * ^^anthropocentric::^^ human-centered (humans are #1)       * ^^biocentric::^^ all life centered (all life equal)     * utilitarian value of nature vs. intrinsic value of nature       * ^^utilitarian::^^ nature is useful to humans       * ^^intrinsic value of nature::^^ nature for nature’s sake   * ^^environmental justice^^ :: every person has right to protection from environmental hazards + to participate in decisions about environmental laws, protection, development, etc.   * ^^precautionary principle^^ :: if there is a potential threat to human health or environment, something must be done to correct it or stop/prevent it, even if cause + effect not fully understood or supported

\