National security/defense/intelligence/foreign-relations
Agency “housekeeping” materials
Statutorily-exempted information (no agency discretion)
Trade secrets & confidential commercial data
Inter-agency/intra-agency working papers; lawyer-client privilege
Personal & medical files (clearly unwarranted privacy invasion)
Law-enforcement records when disclosure would:
• Interfere with proceedings
• Jeopardize fair trial
• Reveal confidential source or investigative methods
• Risk circumvention of law or endanger life/safety
Financial-institution reports
Geological & well data
Appropriation (name/likeness for trade)
Intrusion into solitude/seclusion
Public disclosure of private facts
False-light publication
State statutes granting reporters privilege to withhold sources/notes
Aim: protect newsgathering from compulsory court disclosure
Miller test ( 3 prongs):
• The average person, applying contemporary community standards, finds work appeals to prurient interest
• Patently offensive depiction of sexual conduct as defined by state law
• Work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value
Key cases: Ulysses (work judged as a whole), Roth (obscenity unprotected), Miller (current test)
FCC distinctions:
• Obscene: no First Amendment protection
• Indecent: patently offensive sexual/excretory content (broadcast only)
• Profane: grossly offensive language (broadcast only)
Function: identify source & prevent consumer confusion
Lawful unlicensed uses: parody, criticism/commentary, news reporting
Distinctiveness spectrum: fanciful → arbitrary → suggestive → descriptive (most to least protectable)
Purpose/character (transformative? commercial?)
Nature of copyrighted work
Amount/substantiality used
Effect on market/value
Owner’s rights: reproduce, prepare derivatives, distribute, perform, display
Non-owners need permission; all fixed works automatically protected
Self-regulation: industry codes
Private litigation: competitors & consumers (Lanham Act requires economic/reputational injury)
State & local “little FTC” consumer-protection statutes
Federal: FTC (false/deceptive ads) & FDA (food/drug safety)
FTC deception test: misleading act/omission + reasonable consumer standard + materiality
Principle: equal treatment of all internet traffic; ISPs barred from favoring own content
2024 FCC attempted restoration; 2025 court (after Supreme Court power-limiting ruling) blocked FCC absent Congressional authorization → no federal rules, only state policies
Print & internet: most protected; no prior restraint
Cable/satellite: intermediate; subscription choice reduces intrusiveness
Broadcast: least protected; FCC may restrict indecency/profanity 6\text{ a.m.}–10\text{ p.m.} due to spectrum scarcity & child access
Spectrum scarcity doctrine
Radio Act 1927: “public interest, convenience, necessity” standard
Communications Act 1934: created FCC; unified communication regulation
Sunshine Act 1976: certain federal agency meetings open to public
FOIA (above), COPPA, COPA, CIPA addressed below
COPPA 1998: sites for <13 must obtain parental consent before collecting personal data
CDA 1996: criminalized sending “indecent” internet content to minors (struck down in part)
COPA 1998: targeted commercial porn access by <17; struck down as overbroad
CIPA 2000: libraries must install filters for federal funds; upheld despite “overblocking” concerns
Free speech is a fundamental liberty; enables expression, criticism, idea exchange, and government accountability—core to democratic self-governance