Plato + Theory of Forms
2 realms – ideal + material
Ideal – forms exists + are perfect
Forms are the ideal out of which the inferior material representations are made
Plato + Human Body
Dualist approach and made a distinction between the soul + body
Soul has the ability to know the truth + understand the forms as they are through reason – associated with the mind
Body is physical + can only learn through sensory information
Senses are part of the material body → inherently corrupt
Information obtained through the senses is not knowledge + cannot be regarded with certainty
Soul is unchanging + immortal
Home is in the realm of the ideal
Body is material + of the earth
Mortal and its home is the realm of the material
Plato + Analogy of the Divided Line
Material body → Corrupt senses → Person is ignorant
Embrace the forms
Plato + Allegory of the Cave
Used to explain the 2 realms + importance of knowledge of the forms
Plato regarded the prisoners as analogous to people in the material world
Shadows viewed by the prisoners – inferior material representations of the truth (forms)
Prisoner who escaped is someone who recovered the knowledge of the forms
When dismissed → someone not in touch with the reality (material world)
Reminiscence Theory of Knowledge
Plato took from the Pythagoreans the idea of the soul is immortal + seat of reason
Soul resides in the realm of the forms b/w incarnations → knowledge of the forms
Soul joined with the material body → sensory information corrupted knowledge
To recover → use introspection, reminiscence, reason
Plato’s Tripartite Division of the Soul
Considered the psyche to be the fundamental substance of a person
It is the person – their thoughts + behaviors
Considered psyche to be non-material, eternal occupant of the person
Immortal + not reborn in subsequent incarnations
1st part of the soul is the logos – located in head + associated with reason
2nd thymos – located in chest + associated with emotions, especially anger
3rd eros – located in stomach + associated with desires
Legacy of Plato
Modified the Pythagorean notion of mind-body dualism
Legacy – distrust of information acquired thru the senses
Developed the idea of innate knowledge in the mind
‘Pure’ + could only be recovered through introspection + application of reason
Recovered + applied ‘pure knowledge’ → live virtuously
Aristotle’s Philosophy exemplifies ‘Teleology’ Explanation of Purpose
Understand 4 causes (e.g. table)
Material cause – matter form from which the table is made – wood
Formal cause – form/pattern of the item – design
Efficient cause – force or action that transforms the material into the form – actions of the woodworker/carpentry
Final cause – purpose for which the item exists – platform for dining
Unmoved Mover
Pure actuality + cause of everything in nature
Unmoved mover gives everything in nature its purpose + moves it toward perfection within its classification
Later equate w/ God but not Aristotle’s intent
Aristotle’s Scala Naturae (Ladder of Life)
Believed in an order to nature according to a hierarchy
Each step is a classification
Top of the ladder is the unmoved mover + bottom is inanimate matter
Humans closest to unmoved mover → occupy highest classification
Could be movement toward purpose within a category
No movement between categories
Aristotle’s View of the Soul
Hierarchy of souls
Type of soul possessed determines the purpose of the living thing
A bottom is the vegetative soul – allow for reproduction + growth
Possessed by plants
Next soul up is sensitive soul – allow for mobility, sensation, learning
Possessed by animals
Highest is rational soul – allow for thought + reflection
Possessed only by humans
Sensation + Reason
Aristotle believed that perception was explained thru the motion of objects which stimulated receptors in the sense organ
Sensory information alone did not lead to truth – the sensory information needed to be processed
This is where common sense and reason come in
Common sense – mechanism which coordinated information from the senses
Assumed common sense was situated in the heart
Synthesized information was passed on passive reason
Passive reason – utilizes the synthesized sensory experience + allows one to function in everyday life
Active reason – highest form of reasoning + involves understanding the essences/forms
Aristotle’s Laws of Association
Basis of learning theory into the present
Law of Contiguity – When we think of something, we tend to think of things we experienced along with it
Law of Similarity – When we think of something we tend to think of things similar
Law of Contrast – When we think of something, we tend to think of things that are opposite to it
Law of Frequent – The more often experiences occur together, the stronger will be their association
Aristotle + ‘Golden Mean’
Happiness comes from doing what is natural as it fulfills one’s purpose
Rooted in the desires of the body
One should aim for moderation in everything
Difference b/w Plato + Aristotle
Both interested in truths that go beyond the appearance of things
Different approaches
Plato – Theory of Forms → Socrates view of essences
Forms existed independently of nature + innate knowledge thereof could be obtained thru introspection + reason
senses inherently corrupt + could not be trusted
Aristotle – knowledge of forms → obtained by studying nature + using reason
One could trust sensory information to extent
Knowledge of purpose > forms
Epicurus of Samos
Believed one should avoid all pain by watching pleasure
Intense pleasure → intense pain – aim for moderation
Pain was the result of unfulfilled desire
One should desire what can be fulfilled
Influenced by the materialistic views of Democritus
Saw it as his mission to dispel superstition
Cosmos + everything in it is made up of atoms
Capable of change → world changes with them
Clouds are strings of atoms that can turn to ice
Thunder is the sound of the breaking of ice
Denied teleology – no purpose to the universe – it exists by accident – no purpose in human affairs
People live and die, no afterlife
Did not believe in a soul – atoms are what give people life
Epicurus + the Feast
The Garden – meeting place / refuge from the outside
Quasi religion – dogmatic + debate was not encouraged
Hegemon – leader
Everyone equal + accepted, sex discouraged but not forbidden
One should engage in sexual relations if they are certain they will not vomit afterward
Intelligent people should not marry nor raise children
Intent of life → friendship > sex
Highest form of social pleasure
Legacy of Epicurus of Samos
Believed no one should withdraw from public life
No moral order, no public life, no immortality
No purpose in life + the avoidance of public service did not appeal to the ethos of an empire
Paul of Tarsus (teachings of Jesus) + Plato’s writings
Knowledge could come by reining in the body + not trusting the senses
Battle b/w soul (which contains the spirit of God) + body (contains desires of the flesh) one is going to win out
Radical view that faith must support or supersede reason for only in faith can one find personal salvation
Glorified celibacy + only sanctioned sexual relations with marriage
Accepted common Roman view of the intellectual + social inferiority of women
Both genders spiritual equivalence (radical view)
Humanism will dominate intellectual + artistic discourse
Interest in humanity + life in present
Stressed potential in individualism, personal faith + intense interest in classical past, female education, table manners(Renaissance)
Represented a move against Aristotle + authority accorded his writings by the church
Nicolaus Copernicus + Heliocentric View
De Revolutionibus Orbium Coelestium – heliocentric universe
2 findings
All spheres surround the sun (in middle) → center of universe near sun
What appears to us as motions of the sun is not from its motion but from the motion of the earth – we’re the one revolving around the sun
Earth has more than 1 motion
Copernicus → Johannes Kepler
Orbits of the planet were elliptical, not perfect circles
Thomas Aquinas
Summa Theologiae – appealed to society embracing rudimentary scientific methodology, commercialism, bit of individualism
Scholasticism (Thomas)
Form of reasoning that places a strong emphasis on dialectical argumentation to extend knowledge by inference + resolve contradictions
Notion that truth is not only a belief but also the culmination of a chain of reason
“Does God exist?” → Reasons for non-existence of god
Fallacies
Cause key element
Everything happens for a purpose
Ultimate cause is something outside of this world → God does exist
Reconciliation of Faith + Reason
Aquinas reconciled faith + reason
Church prized faith → Aquinas argued that all paths can lead to truth + God can be known thru scripture, logic, reason, inner experience, examination of nature → All will lead to God if true
Contradictions are evidence of unsound reasoning or misplaced faith
Unintended consequence was separation of faith + reason
Each could be studied separately + processes of mind could be studied in the absence of God
Francis Bacon
Renaissance who challenged Aristotle
Inductive (BOTTOM UP) – observation, past experience, ideas from authority → general conclusion
Deductive (TOP-DOWN) – general principle → application, hypothetical cause, logical extension
Francis Bacon’s Source of Bias
Believed it was essential to approach understanding with an unbiased mind
Dismissed idea of a hypothesis
Idols of the Cave – personal biases from a person’s intellectual endowment, experiences, education, feelings
Idols of the Tribe – biases due to human nature
Idols of the Marketplace – biases from being overly influenced by meaning of words
Idols of the Theater – biases from blind allegiance to any viewpoint
Legacy of Francis Bacon
Believed in practical application of scientific knowledge
Cannot be regarded as scientific =/= dismissed idea of hypothesis
Isaac Newton
Deism – belief in a creator god who established the universe, gave humans natural rights, stepped away exerting no influence on the creation
Developed principles of science
Integral + differential calculus
Light spectrum
Universal law of gravitation
Break science from theology + Aristotle
Rene Descartes
Bringing mathematics, science, truth together thru power of reason
Developed analytical geometry and union of geometry + algebra
Works produced by one was superior to the works produced by groups
Ergo – solitude would lead to greater truth
Descartes + Philosophy
Radical new interpretation of philosophy – sought truth → knowledge which could not be doubted
Never accept anything as true unless it can be recognized as such
Avoid precipitation + prejudgement
Divide any problem into many parts → break it down
Be thorough
Only thing he could be certain of was his own act of thinking (‘I think, therefore I am’)
Mind is unlimited, free, lacking in substance / body is extended, limited, has substance
Different characteristics + follow different laws
2 kinds of thoughts
Innate + rooted in ideas which come from God + do not rely on experience
Experienced with such clarity that the holder knows they are true
Include sense of self + understanding of time, space, motion, unity, infinity, perfection, geometry axioms, existence of God
Past experience
Needle (memories being shaped) piercing fabric (brain) → resultant hole (memory)
Humans experience passions – wonder, love, hate, desire, etc.
Arise from body, passively experienced by mind, lead to bodily actions
Body as a Machine
Functions automatically → people do not will digestion
Nerves were hollow tubes with ‘animal spirits’ derived from the blood
Heart heats + pressurizes the animal spirits + sends the spirits to the muscles where there are sensations + movements
Pressure on a sense organ applied opens a pore in the brain + sensation is experienced
Animals do not have mind of people
Human is created in the image of God → complex
Human mind override mechanical
Mind + body interacted in pineal gland – logical site to come together
Legacy of Descartes
Moved authoritative guarantor of truth from God to humanity
Traditional concept of ‘truth’ → external authority
‘Certainty’ → relies on judgement of individual
Human is now emancipated being equipped with autonomous reason
Reliance on God + Christianity revelation not required for truth
Each person is now shaper of their own reality
Thomas Hobbes (Empiricist)
Rejected dualism + notion of innate knowledge
All ideas come from experience – mind is nothing more than the sum total of a person’s thinking activities
Physical monist/monism – all events in the mind were rooted in physical influences on the senses
Motion of material objects activated the senses
Hobbesian Philosophy
Deterministic view – denied the existence of free will
People have appetites (seek to maintain pleasurable experiences) + aversions (avoid painful experiences)
Person experiences conflict → trouble
Although person will behave in accordance with the dominant experience, conflict will create illusion of free will
Human nature aggressive + selfish
Absence of government allow ‘state of nature’ where everything goes
To prevent internal division → king, strong central authority
Social contract – people gave up something to obtain security
Leviathan – argued that centralized power in an absolute monarch was essential to human society
Did not believe in divine right rather idea that people need to be ruled
David Hume (Empiricist)
1st to put psychology as an independent discipline rather than solely philosophy
Skeptic + doubted God’s existence
Intent in writing Treatise was to do for moral philosophy (social sciences) what Newton had done for natural philosophy (physical sciences) → Wanted to create a science of human nature
Hume + Associationism
Argued that all complex ideas are composed of simple ideas (cannot be divided) + impressions (copies of external objects)
Ideas are merely fainter images of impressions
3 principles of connections among ideas (roots in Aristotle’s Laws of Association)
Resemblance, contiguity in time or place, cause or effect
Focused on causality – our intuitive belief that certain events have been directly caused by certain previous events
Cause is the sequential event between the antecedent + consequence
See something follow something → make connection between the 2 = assumption
All we can know is that regular sequence of events have occurred in the past → leads us to believe it will happen in the future
Ball hits ball → ball moves so it will happen again = assumes existence of causality
Denied innate knowledge – no absolute, only probabilistic chance
Did not deny causality but rather denied the reasoning behind it
Due to the frequency of occurrence, people form a ‘habit’ of tying the 2 events together
This habit is a principle in allowing us to draw inferences from our experiences
Legacy of Hume
Move to analyzing human nature in absence of God
Rejected notion that Christians possessed a more comprehensive understanding of human nature
Thought mixture of ancient skepticism + scientific methodology → superior understanding
Humans stand on their own works without concern for the hereafter
Pyrrho – impossible to know truth, explanations of the world were little more than opinion
Man a Machine
View that there is nothing in the universe other than matter + motion
Sensations + thoughts are only the movement of particles in brain
Natural History of the Soul – explained universe in terms of materialism + denied special status accorded humanity be Christianity
Man a Machine – human mind + body worked like a machine due to mental thoughts depending on bodily actions
Argued that organization of matter at a high + complex level → human thought
Did not believe in existence of God + humans were other than animals (machines)
Humans special = larger brain size, neural complexity, education
Internal organization provided best use of complex matter
Proper training an ape → human, proven wrong
French Positivism
Auguste Comte (Empiricist + Course of Positive Philosophy) defined positivism
Believed that we can only be certain of what is publicly observable
Scientific laws can be derived from observations
Ideally then scientific laws can be applied to betterman of humanity
Positivism tied to scientism
Come saw as foundation for utopian society
Law of 3 Stages
Comte believed societies pass thru 3 stages by which they identify natural events
1st stage theological – explanations are based on superstition + mysticism
2nd stage metaphysical – explanations are based on unseen essences, principles, causes, laws
3rd stage scientific – description is emphasized over explanation + prediction and control of natural phenomena becomes important