Discussion on the necessity of law for regulating relationships with the state.
Examination of various roles fulfilled by the constitution.
Analysis of the wording and provisions of the Canadian constitution and their implications.
The Constitution outlines the authority of different government branches:
Executive: Implements laws and policies.
Legislature: Responsible for making laws.
Judiciary: Interprets laws and administers justice.
Defines interactions among these branches and limits state powers regarding individual rights.
The Charter of Rights and Freedoms is key in curtailing state authority over individuals.
Offers defined rights and freedoms that state actions cannot infringe unless justified.
Section 2: Rights to freedom of expression, religion, association, and conscience.
Section 7: Rights to life, liberty, and security of the person.
Sections 8-14: Rights concerning the criminal justice system.
Section 15: Right to equality, prohibiting discrimination.
Section 16: Acknowledgment of French and English as official languages, imposing obligations on government interactions.
Section 23: Minority education rights.
E.g., English education rights in Quebec for eligible children.
Section 35: Protects Indigenous and treaty rights.
Acknowledges existing rights of indigenous peoples regarding land use and historic titles.
Recognition of unwritten principles influencing legal interpretations and decisions:
Democracy: Assures majority rule in democratic processes with respect to individual province rights.
Federalism: Emphasizes negotiation and cooperation among provinces in matters affecting national unity.
Rule of Law: Ensures legality in government actions, preventing arbitrary decisions.
Protection of Minority Rights: Mandates consideration of minority protections during negotiations.
Foundation of public authority exercise:
Must be based on established legal framework.
Legal challenges are addressed within this context.
Historical context demonstrated via the Roccarelli v. Duplessis case:
Roccarelli, a Jehovah's Witness, lost his liquor license due to political bias from Premier Duplessis.
Supreme Court ruled removal was unlawful as it exceeded lawful authority.
Affirmed the principle that government authority must be exercised within the law's bounds.
Exploration of why we study legal theory and its importance as a starting point for legal analysis:
Theories shape our understanding of law's legitimacy and the context of legal frameworks.
Various theories to be discussed:
Natural Law: Explores the intrinsic link between law and morality.
Advocates that law should reflect universal moral principles.
Challenges arise regarding who defines these principles and potential biases.
Legal Positivism: Focuses on law as it is, not as it ought to be, emphasizing established codes and statutes.
Other Approaches: Include theoretical frames regarding law's role in social change or conflict management.
Legitimacy hinges on immutable and universal moral principles that may not address societal diversity.
Difficulties in applying a single moral perspective across diverse populations.
Law's adaptability to social changes and challenges regarding moral arguments influencing legality.
Focused discussions on different theoretical perspectives in law over the next few weeks to provide a deeper understanding of the law's role.
Examination of historical contexts and contemporary applications of legal theories in societal structures.