Latin America's economic strategies correlated with dramatic political changes.
Countries experimented with various economic models: liberalism, industrialism, socialism, and neoliberalism.
Changes in social structures, urban expansion, and diverse political experiments (revolution, reform, reaction, democracy) emerged.
The chapter aims to present broad similarities in political transitions and identify regional differences.
Understanding the relationship between economic and political transformations through comparative analysis.
Emphasis on overall contexts rather than specific national histories.
Democracy:
Oligarchic democracy: Limited electoral competition among elites.
Co-optative democracy: Inclusion of rising middle classes in political processes.
Liberal democracy: Free elections combined with full civil rights.
Illiberal democracy: Free elections paired with systematic civil liberties denial.
Authoritarianism:
Traditional dictatorship: Individual military leaders in control.
One-party rule: Dominance of populist alliances.
Bureaucratic authoritarianism: Military rule with bureaucratic collaboration.
Revolutionary states: Aimed at structural change based on socialist principles.
The Industrial Revolution prompted major changes in 19th-century Latin America, leading to export-import economies.
Economic power consolidated among upper classes, translating into political ambitions.
Forms of Upper-Class Political Authority:
Direct control of government by elites (e.g., Argentina, Chile).
Dictatorial control by military strongmen (e.g., Porfirio Díaz in Mexico).
Political stability prioritized to attract foreign investment essential for economic growth.
The emergence of urban working classes and labor movements challenging elite dominance met with government repression.
Liberal elites sought to co-opt middle-class political ambitions enabling a class ascent while excluding lower classes.
Significant political reforms in various countries (e.g., voting laws in Argentina) allowed middle-class representation.
The Great Depression resulted in economic devastation, prompting military rule across Latin America.
Military coups dismantled the era of oligarchic democracy, reflecting structural societal changes.
Introduction of import-substitution industrialization as a state-driven recovery strategy.
Growing strength of the labor movement led to two avenues; continuation of co-optative democracy or the emergence of populist alliances.
Political leaders like Getúlio Vargas (Brazil) and Juan Perón (Argentina) created pro-industrial coalitions favoring labor interests.
Women's roles historically limited to the private sphere evolved over time, leading to influential figures like Evita Perón.
Female suffrage achieved chiefly under authoritarian regimes to manipulate electoral outcomes.
Post-WWII economic growth facilitated the expansion of electoral democracy in the region.
Rise of middle-class reformers advocating for social justice highlighted the political tensions between established elites and emerging interests.
In the face of economic stagnation, military regimes imposed repression, controlled labor movements, and dismantled political rights, leading to widespread human rights abuses including state terrorism.
Marxist movements emerged in impoverished nations leading to guerrilla warfare and revolutions in Cuba and Nicaragua.
Revolutionary governments prioritized strong states and socialist ideals contrasted with authoritarianism.
Economic crises and human right abuses led to civilian pressure for democracy and accountability.
The end of Cold War tensions fostered a new context for political transformation in the region.
Ideological shifts towards neoliberalism shaped public discourse and political consensus.
The dynamics of political transformation in Latin America reflect a complex interplay of historical, economic, and social factors that have shaped the region over time.