Grading System

Total Points: 60

Grading Scale

Grade: A

• Points Range: 54 - 60

• Description: Excellent work demonstrating mastery of the topic with original insights.

Grade: B

• Points Range: 48 - 53

• Description: Strong work with clear understanding of the topic and solid arguments.

Grade: C

• Points Range: 42 - 47

• Description: Satisfactory work that meets basic requirements but lacks depth.

Grade: D

• Points Range: 36 - 41

• Description: Needs improvement in analysis and argumentation.

Grade: F

• Points Range: 0 - 35

• Description: Unsatisfactory work that fails to meet the assignment requirements.

Notes

• Clear criteria guidelines provided to enhance understanding of assignment expectations.

• Focus on how to develop critical thoughts around modern cultural implications.

Rubric

Thesis Statement

• Points: 10

  • Description: Presents a clear, focused, and compelling thesis statement that effectively addresses the concepts of sigma and skibidi and their implications.

• Points: 8

  • Description: Presents a defined thesis that adequately addresses the key concepts and implications.

• Points: 6

  • Description: Presents a somewhat clear thesis statement, but it may lack focus on the central concepts.

• Points: 4

  • Description: Presents a vague thesis statement that fails to address the main concepts effectively.

• Points: 2

  • Description: Fails to present a coherent or relevant thesis statement.

Evidence & Support

• Points: 10

  • Description: Integrates rich, relevant, and specific examples supporting arguments about sigma and skibidi.

• Points: 8

  • Description: Uses adequate examples that generally support the essay’s arguments.

• Points: 6

  • Description: Includes some relevant examples, but they may not strongly support the arguments presented.

• Points: 4

  • Description: Limited use of examples; examples may be irrelevant or insufficient.

• Points: 2

  • Description: Fails to provide pertinent evidence or examples.

Argumentative Structure

• Points: 10

  • Description: Demonstrates exceptional organization with a clear introduction, well-structured paragraphs, and a solid conclusion.

• Points: 8

  • Description: Exhibits good organization with clear ideas, although may have minor issues in flow.

• Points: 6

  • Description: Basic organization is evident, but transitions may be weak or paragraphs may lack clear focus.

• Points: 4

  • Description: Limited structure; ideas are poorly organized and may lack logical flow.

• Points: 2

  • Description: Lacks organization with disjointed arguments that impede understanding.

Counterarguments

• Points: 10

  • Description: Skillfully addresses and refutes counterarguments, strengthening the overall position.

• Points: 8

  • Description: Acknowledges counterarguments but may not fully address or refute them.

• Points: 6

  • Description: Mentions counterarguments without in-depth analysis or refutation.

• Points: 4

  • Description: Limited mention of counterarguments, with minimal discussion.

• Points: 2

  • Description: Fails to acknowledge or address any counterarguments.

Language & Conventions

• Points: 10

  • Description: Exhibits advanced command of language with precise vocabulary, varied sentence structure, and minimal errors.

• Points: 8

  • Description: Demonstrates good command of language with occasional errors that do not impede understanding.

• Points: 6

  • Description: Basic command of language observed, but repetitive language or noticeable errors appear.

• Points: 4

  • Description: Limited command of language with frequent errors that distract from the content.

• Points: 2

  • Description: Severe issues with language use, making it challenging to read or understand.

Formatting & Presentation

• Points: 10

  • Description: Adheres perfectly to all formatting and citation guidelines, enhancing overall presentation.

• Points: 8

  • Description: Mostly follows guidelines with minor deviations that do not detract from the overall presentation.

• Points: 6

  • Description: Basic adherence to formatting; some inconsistencies present.

• Points: 4

  • Description: Limited adherence to formatting and citation guidelines, impacting readability.

• Points: 2

  • Description: Fails to follow any formatting or citation guidelines, compromising presentation.