Nietzsche critiques traditional morality, especially as represented by Christianity.
He suggests that the natural instinct of life is at odds with moralistic views that seek to suppress passions.
All passions have both a destructive phase and a later phase in which they can be refined or "spiritualized".
Historically, morality has aimed to suppress passions due to their perceived stupidity.
Example: In the New Testament, it states, "If thy eye offend thee, pluck it out."
Nietzsche argues that the destruction of passions leads to a denial of life itself.
Christianity has historically viewed passions as harmful and sought their eradication, exemplifying this through ascetic practices.
Nietzsche asserts that the concept of "spiritualization of passion" was missing in the origins of Christianity, as the church prioritized the poor in spirit over the intelligent.
The church fights passion through excision rather than transformation.
Individuals who lack the strength of will resort to radical means, such as castration or extirpation of passions, instead of moderation.
This radical hostility to passions is a sign of personal weakness or degeneration.
Nietzsche introduces the idea that the spiritualization of passions can also be experienced through love and the appreciation of having adversaries.
This contrasts with the church's view, which wishes for the destruction of enemies.
Political landscapes recognize the value of opposition for their own existence and strength.
Nietzsche criticizes the desire for 'peace of soul' as misunderstood; true vitality often includes internal conflict.
Examples of 'peace of soul' include chemical satisfaction, maturity through action, and overcoming weakness.
Suggests that continual striving and conflict keep one youthful, opposing the Christian ideal of a tranquil conscience.
Natural morality fulfills life-promoting commandments, while anti-natural morality condemns these life instincts.
The notion of a "kingdom of God" represents a denial of life's vitality, with an emphasis on condemnation.
Life's instincts are condemned by a morality rooted in decadence, where morality becomes a negation of life itself.
Nietzsche denounces the moralist perspective that prescribes how humans ought to be, interpreting it as unrealistic and reductive.
Every demand for change reflects a desire for a different reality — a denial of life as it exists.
The moral condemnation of life is portrayed as a malady that harms rather than aids.
Nietzsche contrasts the moralist's negation with the position of the "immoralist," who affirms life and embraces understanding.
Immoralists utilize all aspects of existence, even those that might be rejected by traditional morality, for life’s gain.
This perspective offers a more nuanced and dynamic engagement with the world than rigid moral codes.