S

RE SAC - UNIT 2 AOS 1

  • Ethics – Rules of conduct that guide actions based on what’s right and wrong.

  • Morals – Personal beliefs about right and wrong behavior.

  • Pluralism – Accepting multiple perspectives or values in society.

  • Conscience – Inner sense of what is right or wrong.

  • Objective – Based on facts, not influenced by personal feelings.

  • Subjective – Based on personal feelings or opinions.

  • Stakeholder – Anyone affected by a decision or issue.

  • Viewpoint – A person’s perspective or opinion.

  • Ethical Perspective – A way of looking at what is right or wrong based on a theory.

  • Amorality – Having no sense of morality (neutral, not good or bad).

  • Laws – Rules set by governments that must be followed.

  • Moral Compass – A guide (like conscience) that helps decide what’s right or wrong.

  • Ethical Principle – A basic rule to guide ethical decisions (e.g. honesty).

  • Moral Values – Personal standards of behavior (e.g. kindness, fairness).

  • Immorality – Deliberate violation of moral principles.

  • Highest Good – The ultimate goal of morality or the best possible outcome.

  • Democratic Society – A society where people have equal rights and freedom to vote.

  • Normative Standards – Accepted rules about how people should behave.

  • Social Norms – Common behaviors expected in a society.

  • Mores – Deeply held cultural beliefs about morality.

  • Intuition – Knowing or sensing something without logical reasoning.

  • Assumptions – Beliefs taken for granted without proof.

  • Ethical Authority – A person or source considered credible in making ethical judgments.

  • Ethical Decision-Making – The process of choosing actions based on ethical reasoning.



Consequentialist Ethics (Focus: Outcome)

  • Utilitarianism – The right action brings the most happiness to the most people.
    Example: Saving 5 lives over 1 in a hospital decision.

  • Humanism – Focuses on human welfare and dignity, aiming for human flourishing.

Deontological Ethics (Focus: Duty)

  • Natural Law – Right and wrong are found in nature and human reason (e.g. protect life).

  • Kantian Ethics – Actions must follow universal moral rules (e.g. never lie).

  • Divine Command Theory – Right and wrong are determined by God's commands.

Virtue Ethics (Focus: Character)

  • Being a good person (e.g. honest, brave) is more important than rules or outcomes.


Strengths & Weaknesses of Approaches

Approach

Strengths

Weaknesses

Utilitarianism

Fair, focuses on happiness

Can ignore individual rights

Deontology

Clear rules, respects people

Can be rigid or unrealistic

Virtue Ethics

Builds good character

Hard to apply in tough choices

Humanism

Values human dignity

Can be vague in complex dilemmas

Cultural Relativism

Respects diversity

Can't judge harmful traditions

Absolutism

Clear right/wrong

Doesn't allow for context

Subjectivism

Personal choice respected

Can justify anything


Applying Ethics in Law (Vocational Setting: Lawyer)

  • Dilemma: Defending a client you know is guilty.

  • Stakeholders: Lawyer, client, victim, court, public.

  • Ethical Theory Used:

    • Deontology: Fulfilling duty to represent the client.

    • Utilitarianism: Ensuring fair legal system benefits all.

  • Strengths: Protects right to a fair trial, preserves justice system integrity.

  • Weaknesses: Personal morals may conflict with legal duty.




  • Personal Example: Telling a friend the truth vs sparing feelings.
    Approach: Intuition + Subjectivism

  • Work Example: Reporting a co-worker’s error.
    Ethics Used: Duty (deontology), but emotionally hard.
    Challenge: Loyalty vs honesty.