Authors: Kaeko Yokota, Ph.D., Goro Fujita, Ph.D., Kazumi Watanabe, B.A., Kaori Yoshimoto, B.A., Taeko Wachi, M.Phil.
Purpose: Developed a data-based profiling system to support offender profiling by storing incident records of prior offenders.
Input unsolved incident details, assigning probability scores indicating behavioral similarity with known offenders.
Ranked offenders based on scores to prioritize possible suspects.
Inferred characteristics of unknown offenders from high-ranked offenders.
Achieved a high retrieval accuracy (45 out of 81 trials retrieved target offenders ranked as 1).
History: Offender profiling techniques established by FBI agents, widely adopted internationally since the 1990s.
Japan's Development: The National Research Institute of Police Science began profiling research in 1996.
Established police units focused on behavioral crime analysis to support investigations by 2000.
Theory: For effective profiling, consistency in offender behavior across contexts is necessary, despite natural human variability (Alison et al., 2002).
Related Studies:
Modus Operandi Approach: Offenders develop personal methods based on previous successes (O’Hara, 1956).
Psychological Signature: A consistent psychological imprint left at crime scenes by offenders (Douglas et al., 1992).
Incidents analyzed: 1,252 records from 868 offenses (rape and indecency through compulsion).
Variables included victim type, location, time, method of approach, weapon, and behavior.
Exclusions: Different types of sexual offenses and duplicate incidents from the same offenders.
Probability Score Calculation: A probability score indicates an offender's behavioral similarity to an unsolved incident.
Multinomial distribution was used to determine choice probabilities for actions performed during crimes.
A collection of simulations conducted to test the effectiveness of linking incidents with specific offenders.
Hit rate of 29.6%, indicating successful identification in approximately 30% of trials.
Median rank score of 4 suggests that half of the offenders were retrieved within a small range of rank scores.
Examined sex crime history of offenders among the top 5% most similar to target incidents.
Results suggested that offenders with similar criminal styles often share a repeat offender profile.
Inclusion of crime location as a variable improved hit rate from 29.6% to 55.6%.
Indicates the importance of geographical context in profiling.
The proportion of offenders with past sex crime history was notably higher among repeat offenders compared to first-time offenders, confirming profiling effectiveness.
Reliable predictors of offending behavior could infer the likelihood of further crimes based on past actions.
System Implications: The Behavioral Investigative Support System holds promise for accurately linking crimes to offenders, suggesting a systematic approach can yield positive investigative results.
Limitations: Need for a robust database for comprehensive accuracy in profiling efforts; limitations due to variability in original data collection processes.
Future Directions: Continued developments in profiling systems to enhance predictive accuracy and operational readiness for police forces in Japan.