Compare drive, incentive, and evolutionary approaches to understanding motivation.
Motives: Needs, wants, interests, and desires that propel people in specific directions.
Motivation: Involves goal-directed behavior.
Psychologists have developed various theoretical approaches to explain motivation.
Drive theories view motivational forces in terms of drives.
Homeostasis: A state of physiological equilibrium or stability, observed by Walter Cannon (1932).
The body maintains homeostasis through various mechanisms.
Example: Body temperature regulation around 37 degrees Celsius.
If body temperature rises: perspiration occurs.
If body temperature drops: shivering occurs.
These reactions aim to restore equilibrium.
Drive: A hypothetical, internal state of tension that motivates an organism to engage in activities to reduce this tension.
Unpleasant states of tension are viewed as disruptions of the preferred equilibrium.
Individuals experiencing a drive are motivated to pursue actions leading to drive reduction.
Example: Hunger motive.
Going without food leads to discomfort (internal tension/drive), motivating the individual to obtain food.
Eating reduces the drive and restores physiological equilibrium.
Drive theories have been influential but cannot explain all motivation.
Homeostasis is irrelevant to some human motives (e.g., desire for knowledge or learning).
Drive theories do not adequately explain eating when not hungry.
Incentive theories: External stimuli regulate motivational states.
Incentive: An external goal that can motivate behavior.
Examples: ice cream, monetary prize, approval from friends, an A on an exam, a promotion at work.
Some incentives reduce drives, while others do not.
Drive vs. Incentive Models:
Drive theories: Internal states of tension push people in certain directions (push).
Incentive theories: External stimuli pull people in certain directions (pull).
Source of Motivation:
Drive theories: Source lies within the organism.
Incentive theories: Source lies outside the organism, in the environment.
Incentive models emphasize the role of environmental factors rather than homeostasis.
Evolutionary perspective: Motives of humans and other species are products of evolution, like anatomical characteristics.
Natural selection favors behaviors that maximize reproductive success (passing on genes to the next generation).
Motives are explained in terms of their adaptive value (e.g., affiliation, achievement, dominance, aggression, and sex drive).
Evolutionary analyses: Motives are best understood in terms of the adaptive problems they have solved over human history.
Example: Need for dominance is thought to be greater in men than women because it could facilitate males’ reproductive success.
Females may prefer mating with dominant males.
Dominant males may lure females from subordinate males.
Dominant males may intimidate male rivals in competition for sexual access.
Dominant males may acquire more material resources that may increase mating opportunities.
Example: Affiliation motive (need for belongingness).
Adaptive benefits for ancestors: help with offspring, collaboration in hunting and gathering, mutual defense, and opportunities for sexual interaction.
Humans developed a strong need to belong and a strong aversion to rejection.
Sibusiso Vilane's Motivation:
Climbing Mount Everest can be seen as demonstrating mastery over himself and his environment.
Incentive: To show that Africans can achieve their goals.
Need for mastery as an expression of his need to dominate (actions matched ambition) and affiliate (achieving his goal meant African citizens can collectively reach great heights).
Diversity of Motives:
Motivational theorists agree that humans display an enormous diversity of motives.
Local conditions and experiences affect the way in which these theories manifest in practice.
Motivation results from the interaction between the individual and the environment, and some forms of motivation are learned through a person's own experiences (Locke & Schattke, 2019).
Context is vital in understanding why certain processes and outcomes are motivating.
Contextual factors include national culture, gender, age, or generation.
Different people and groups may be motivated to different degrees by different factors (no 'one size fits all').
Unique South African findings may help change existing theories and give rise to completely new ways of explaining the world.
Psychology needs to be seen as an evolving, ever-changing set of explanations about people and their experiences.
Given the range and diversity of human motives, the text will focus on hunger, sex, and achievement.
The text will then explore the elements of emotional experience and discuss various theories of emotion.