VI. The Enlightened Age of Reason (Chapter 16)
Humans are naturally good → natural reason exists in all of us
If humans can live in a nice environment, a utopia is theoretically possible
Progress is inevitable
Go from uncontrolled beasts to enlightened reason
Education, need for teacher to have lightbulbs to go off
Most enlightened people are historians – Plato, Socrates
Human nature is uniform (predictable)
Newtonian, mathematical
Anti-enlightened assumptions
English Civil War displayed chaos, disorder, and danger
Beheading of a king
People massacring each other
Hobbes lived through this, impacted his views
Lenses are different; varying views
Humans: dominated by passion, appetites, and physical needs (mechanistic)
Satisfy needs at expense of other men (selfish/individualistic)
State of nature = constant warfare
Selfish needs drive war
Solution: social contract giving up power to an absolute ruler
Giving democracy to people when people are selfish?
Absolute ruler wants power and wealth
Needs to be careful, be good to the people to continue his rule
Interests of the ruler aligns with the people to prevent overthrow
State of nature is worse than tyranny
Tabula rasa – blank slate
Humans are born neither good nor bad
Environment shapes character
Humans = naturally rational, reason leads to moral character
Moral character → more moral characters → utopia
Social contract to form civil society AND form a government
Give up some freedoms for protection, live in harmony
Violate social contract → punishment
Government protects your unalienable rights – life, liberty, property
Failed government → rescinding contract; civil society keeps out chaos
Vote out government – elections
“What has not been examined impartially has not been well examined. Skepticism is therefore the first step toward truth.” – Denis Diderot
17th century scientists believed their work proved God (e.g. Newton)
Not all skeptics are atheists!
Skeptics emerged questioning absolute truths and organized religion
Themes: rational, progressive science over reactionary priests
Creates social turmoil
Bayle: open-minded tolerance; nothing can be known beyond doubt (moderate)
Skepticism happening in France "underground”
No “freedom of speech” for now…
d’Holbach: humans were machines determined by outside forces (inflexible atheist)
No free choice; nature makes the choices for you
Outside forces: agriculture, weather, plague
Hume: ideas reflect our sense experiences
Reasons tells nothing
Go with “gut feelings” and intuition, don’t try to reason them
Undermined Enlightenment’s power of reason
Anti-reason philosophers exist in the Age of Reason
Hume and d’Holbach contributed to this
John Toland (1696): Deist, nature proves God’s existence, validity in religion
Religion enforces reason – perfection in nature, must be planned by God
Deist – God is all-powerful in the creation of people, but people have free will
God will never intervene in daily life
aka “watchmaker” or “toy soldier”
George Berkeley (1710): matter does not exist except as we perceive it (subjective idealism)
What matter is to us is how we perceive it.
Candle = heat = light = religious stuff
God controls mind
Immanuel Kant: agreed with Hume’s limitations of reason, but sought absolutes (God)
Plays more closely to the church
Be careful trying to reason with God
Voltaire: attacked irrationality, intolerance, and superstition
“Crush the damn thing!”
Advocated for tolerance, rationality, and reason
Diderot (DID-er-o) viewed science as a way to achieve Voltaire’s goals (Encycloedie)
Compiled encyclopedia as a means to becoming tolerant and rational
Hated the Catholic church
Montesquieu: Spirit of Laws balanced monarchy, aristocracy, and democracy
Three branches of government with checks and balances
Philosophes generally did not associate with each other, but they read and were influenced by each others’ works.
Reason is good, but heart is a better guide to conduct
Man happiest in primitive state of nature (rejected Hobbes/Locke)
State of nature = caveman looking for people – communal, basic
As we progress, happiness goes down – anxiety, inequality, hierarchical, artificial laws, private property
Civilization corrupted man – progress can be regress
Driven by collecting private property
Hates slavery
Anarchist, early communism
Emile (1762): educational system should emphasize expression and self-discovery
Social Contract: big states corrupt; small states → natural state of man (more trust in gov’t)
Government should follow the will of the people
In a smaller state, you have more say in the government
Confessions: emotional and moral ambiguity of adult life; influences Romanticism
Pre-Rousseau philosophies
Monarchies said they should adopt Enlightenment ideas to better the people
Monarchs end nobility privilege, give freedom (Enlightened Despots)
Despots = king/queens
Goes about it top-down,
Rousseau: Monarchy is rotten, abolish it, people have power given by Social Contract
American/French revolutionary ideas
Humans are naturally good → natural reason exists in all of us
If humans can live in a nice environment, a utopia is theoretically possible
Progress is inevitable
Go from uncontrolled beasts to enlightened reason
Education, need for teacher to have lightbulbs to go off
Most enlightened people are historians – Plato, Socrates
Human nature is uniform (predictable)
Newtonian, mathematical
Anti-enlightened assumptions
English Civil War displayed chaos, disorder, and danger
Beheading of a king
People massacring each other
Hobbes lived through this, impacted his views
Lenses are different; varying views
Humans: dominated by passion, appetites, and physical needs (mechanistic)
Satisfy needs at expense of other men (selfish/individualistic)
State of nature = constant warfare
Selfish needs drive war
Solution: social contract giving up power to an absolute ruler
Giving democracy to people when people are selfish?
Absolute ruler wants power and wealth
Needs to be careful, be good to the people to continue his rule
Interests of the ruler aligns with the people to prevent overthrow
State of nature is worse than tyranny
Tabula rasa – blank slate
Humans are born neither good nor bad
Environment shapes character
Humans = naturally rational, reason leads to moral character
Moral character → more moral characters → utopia
Social contract to form civil society AND form a government
Give up some freedoms for protection, live in harmony
Violate social contract → punishment
Government protects your unalienable rights – life, liberty, property
Failed government → rescinding contract; civil society keeps out chaos
Vote out government – elections
“What has not been examined impartially has not been well examined. Skepticism is therefore the first step toward truth.” – Denis Diderot
17th century scientists believed their work proved God (e.g. Newton)
Not all skeptics are atheists!
Skeptics emerged questioning absolute truths and organized religion
Themes: rational, progressive science over reactionary priests
Creates social turmoil
Bayle: open-minded tolerance; nothing can be known beyond doubt (moderate)
Skepticism happening in France "underground”
No “freedom of speech” for now…
d’Holbach: humans were machines determined by outside forces (inflexible atheist)
No free choice; nature makes the choices for you
Outside forces: agriculture, weather, plague
Hume: ideas reflect our sense experiences
Reasons tells nothing
Go with “gut feelings” and intuition, don’t try to reason them
Undermined Enlightenment’s power of reason
Anti-reason philosophers exist in the Age of Reason
Hume and d’Holbach contributed to this
John Toland (1696): Deist, nature proves God’s existence, validity in religion
Religion enforces reason – perfection in nature, must be planned by God
Deist – God is all-powerful in the creation of people, but people have free will
God will never intervene in daily life
aka “watchmaker” or “toy soldier”
George Berkeley (1710): matter does not exist except as we perceive it (subjective idealism)
What matter is to us is how we perceive it.
Candle = heat = light = religious stuff
God controls mind
Immanuel Kant: agreed with Hume’s limitations of reason, but sought absolutes (God)
Plays more closely to the church
Be careful trying to reason with God
Voltaire: attacked irrationality, intolerance, and superstition
“Crush the damn thing!”
Advocated for tolerance, rationality, and reason
Diderot (DID-er-o) viewed science as a way to achieve Voltaire’s goals (Encycloedie)
Compiled encyclopedia as a means to becoming tolerant and rational
Hated the Catholic church
Montesquieu: Spirit of Laws balanced monarchy, aristocracy, and democracy
Three branches of government with checks and balances
Philosophes generally did not associate with each other, but they read and were influenced by each others’ works.
Reason is good, but heart is a better guide to conduct
Man happiest in primitive state of nature (rejected Hobbes/Locke)
State of nature = caveman looking for people – communal, basic
As we progress, happiness goes down – anxiety, inequality, hierarchical, artificial laws, private property
Civilization corrupted man – progress can be regress
Driven by collecting private property
Hates slavery
Anarchist, early communism
Emile (1762): educational system should emphasize expression and self-discovery
Social Contract: big states corrupt; small states → natural state of man (more trust in gov’t)
Government should follow the will of the people
In a smaller state, you have more say in the government
Confessions: emotional and moral ambiguity of adult life; influences Romanticism
Pre-Rousseau philosophies
Monarchies said they should adopt Enlightenment ideas to better the people
Monarchs end nobility privilege, give freedom (Enlightened Despots)
Despots = king/queens
Goes about it top-down,
Rousseau: Monarchy is rotten, abolish it, people have power given by Social Contract
American/French revolutionary ideas