Descartes aims to find truth by doubting everything that can be doubted.
By the end of the first meditation, he is in a state of universal doubt.
The senses deceive us, and dreams are indistinguishable from reality.
It's possible the senses always deceive, and we are permanently in a dream state.
Descartes imagines an evil demon deceiving us in every possible way.
He doubts the existence of the physical world, his body, senses, and everything around him.
Descartes questions if his existence is a deception, given he doubts everything.
He wonders if he is separate from his body or one and the same with it.
If he is one with his body, then doubting the physical world means doubting his existence.
Could the evil demon make us believe we are alive when we are not?
Descartes feels it's wrong to doubt his own existence.
He asks, "I myself, am I not at least something?"
Even if the body and senses are doubted, does his whole existence also fall into doubt?
He questions if he is so dependent on the body and senses that he cannot exist without them.
Despite the possibility of an evil demon, Descartes realizes he exists as long as he is something.
Descartes has an epiphany: he is thinking, and as long as he thinks, he exists.
"I think, therefore I am" becomes his assurance of his existence.
He needs to define what "I" is.
He rejects definitions like "man" or "rational animal" because they lead to further questions.
He claims he is more than just the body, as material objects can be doubted, but his ability to think cannot.
Descartes draws a distinction between the mind and the body.
He can't conceive of himself existing without the mind but can doubt the physical body.
He concludes he must be just a thinking thing.
A "thinking thing" doubts, perceives, affirms, denies, wills, imagines, and feels.
This "thing" is likened to the mind or the soul.
Descartes feels corporal properties tested by the senses are more distinctly known.
He initially feels he knows the things he now doubts better than the truth he has reached.
He sees this as a habit, but the more he thinks about the new truth, the more he affirms it.
Descartes uses the example of wax to question the nature of the physical.
A solid block of wax has a specific shape, size, and odor.
When left by the fire, it melts, changes shape and size, and loses its odor.
Yet, we still recognize it as the same piece of wax.
Our senses perceive something completely different, but our rationality understands it is the same wax.
This demonstrates that our knowledge of the physical world does not derive from the senses but from our mind's understanding and processing of information.
The senses can be deceived, so everything perceived through them can be doubted.
Truth can only be reached through our minds, rationality, reason, and logical thinking.
The mental world is truer and a better source of knowledge than the physical world.
Certain knowledge is based upon our thoughts and ideas alone, not the evidence of the senses.
The more we rely upon our senses, the more uncertain our knowledge will be.
The more independent of sense experience our knowledge is, the more certain it will be.
Posteriori: Where empiricism relies on forming knowledge based upon what the senses perceive
Priori: Rationalism basis knowledge upon what the mind reasons
We cannot doubt our existence if we think; "I think, therefore I am."
The mind and the body are separate, and we can conceive of existing without our body.
The only true knowledge we can attain is from the mind alone.