learning and motivation unit three (week 13)
Stereotype Threat
- can result in disidentification with the domain
- stereotype threat: people find themselves to be at risk of conforming to stereotypes about their social group
- What is the construct? * stereotype threat: one feels at risk to conforming to the negative stereotypes about their group * affects those who identify with a domain (they really care about how they do) * can result in disidentification with the domain * when people feel vulnerable to a stereotype they will distance themselves from the domain
- In what domains and groups does this threat exist? * women in math * students from low socioeconomic backgrounds (imposter syndrome) * latinos in scholastic domain * the elderly on short-term memory tests (when primed with senility) * can even be induced short-term in white men in math when primed with a more stereotypically successful group in the domain (asian men)
- Study 1 * 114 undergraduate college students (male, female, black, and white) * independent variable: test description (diagnostic of ability or not or as a challenge) * dependent variable: test performance * 30 GRE items * self-report measure of confidence in performance * personal worth * hypothesis: black ppl in the diagnostic condition do worse than the white people and the black people in the nondiagnostic condition
- Study 2 * 40 female undergraduate students, 20 white and 20 black * independent variable: test description (diagnostic of ability or not) * dependent variable: level of anxiety * used a computer - the 25 question test and the anxiety test afterwards * hypothesis: the apprehension caused by the stereotype threat can be shown in a general anxiety test * anxiety mediates the relationship between diagnostic and performance * no difference found in anxiety: maybe the measures were too delayed * the phenomenon occurred again * black ppl in the diagnostic condition do worse than white people and the black people in the nondiagnostic condition * black students in diagnostic group did worse than black students in nondiagnostic group / white students * black people completed fewer items than white people and black people in diagnostic group completed less than black in nondiagnostic
- Study 3 * 68 undergrads. 35 black (9 male, 26 female) and 33 white (20 male, 13 female) * independent variable: race by diagnostic / nondiagnostic / control * dependent variable: test performance * used a booklet instead of a computer * GRE, LAP (anagrams priming words associated with stereotypes), stereotype avoidance task (will they distance themselves from black activities) * self-handicapping - distancing themselves from their domain
- Study 4
* 47 undergrads. 24 black participants - 6 male, 18 female - and 23 white
* independent variable: race prime or no race prime on questionnaire (just asked about race)
* doesn’t the sat / act ask about race up front? are they not priming race?
* dependent variable: performance on test, questionnaire about stereotype threat, academic identification items
* test taken on paper
* tested effort
* 75% of black people in diagnostic did not indicate race - Mechanisms * What do you think could explain why stereotype threat leads to performance decrements? * number of black people in the study - if taken in a room together, what does being the only black person taking the test do to their performance? or in a predominantly black school? * parallels between performance-avoidance and stereotype avoidance * expectation: combination of stereotype threat and diagnostic have a sense of prejudice and bias. bias is already there and can’t avoid * subconscious self-fulfilling prophecy
\