Industrial Workers of the World (IWW): Known as one big union or a big tent organization.
Ideology: Explicitly anti-capitalist; avoids association with socialist or communist parties due to their hierarchical structures.
Organizational Structure: Prefers horizontal decision-making, often referred to as anarchist, particularly "anarcho-syndicalism" which emphasizes workers' organization without elected leaders.
The IWW is a key labor union organizing in the Central Valley, crossing racial lines during a time of widespread segregation and racial policies among labor unions.
Demographics of Labor: The labor population in California shifts to include a growing number of Mexican and Mexican American workers amidst poor economic conditions.
California becomes the largest agricultural-producing state by the 1930s, surpassing Texas and Midwestern states, leading to the emergence of a farmworkers' movement primarily focused in regions like the Central Valley and Coachella Valley.
One wing is associated with Mexican consulates, advocating for moderate demands and cooperation with growers.
The other wing is associated with the IWW, advocating for radical demands and representing a broad cross-section of workers regardless of race.
Mexican Consulates: Established to support Mexican migrants adapting in the U.S.; their role was to ensure worker rights without promoting radicalism or rebellion.
Moderate Demands: Those aligned with the consulates have been seen as more conciliatory and focused on maintaining peaceful relations with American growers.
1933: A year marked by significant labor conflicts in California, notably involving strikes at El Monte, Tagus Ranch, and throughout the Central Valley.
El Monte Strike: Initiated by around 600 workers, advocating for better wages and union recognition in agricultural contract negotiations.
Union Recognition Demand: Workers sought to have their union represent them in negotiating annual contracts with farmers, which historically occurred without worker input.
Exclusion from Labor Legislation: Agricultural workers were often excluded from New Deal labor laws due to the seasonal and migratory nature of farm work.
Resulted in moderate terms favorable to the consuls, with notable cooperation from local law enforcement to control the strike.
Strikers received some concessions but did not achieve the desired outcomes that would empower their union.
Tagus Ranch: Owned by Hewlett Merritt, a major agricultural enterprise and the world’s largest stone fruit producer.
Workers were paid in scrip money, which could only be spent at company stores, effectively trapping them in economic dependence on the ranch.
Key Demands: Workers called for an end to scrip, a 40-hour work week, and wage increases based on performance.
The strike saw dramatic confrontations as the owner attempted to evict striking workers from ranch property, with local law enforcement initially refusing to intervene.
Eventually led to the abolition of scrip money, allowing workers to be paid in actual currency, which was a significant victory for the labor movement despite other concessions.
The aftermath highlighted the distinct roles of moderates associated with the consulates versus radicals from the IWW, with this strike showing a shift towards radical leadership in negotiating worker demands.