Recognition of Right to Travel: A fundamental aspect protected under substantive due process.
Procedural/Substantive Due Process: Ensures fairness in the trial process through evidentiary rules.
Quality of Evidence: A key determinant for a fair trial; evidence presented must be credible and uncontaminated.
Probative Evidence:
Crucial for assessing guilt or innocence.
Includes:
Facts of the case
Witness testimony
Forensic evidence
Aims for objective assessment of the defendant's guilt or innocence.
Prejudicial Evidence:
Information likely to evoke juror biases or passions.
Does not focus directly on the case facts.
Includes graphic photographs and propensity evidence (past behavior).
Exception: Impeachment of defendant's credibility through testimony, e.g., past criminal record or character evidence.
Substantive Due Process: Ensures fairness in criminal trials by distinguishing between probative and prejudicial evidence.
Prior Bad Acts:
History of criminal record vs. relevance to current charges.
Fairness Assessment: Evaluation of probative versus prejudicial testimony.
Trial One (2017):
Involvement of 1 accuser alongside Constand.
Trial Two (2018):
Involvement of 5 accusers alongside Constand.
Issue: Non-prosecution agreement (verbal).
Deposition: Recorded written statements impacting the case.