Sojourner Mentality
Chinese immigrants often practiced a sojourner mentality, intending to return to China rather than fully assimilate into American society.
This mindset contributed to separation from the larger culture.
Passive Resistance
Similar to Irish and African ancestors, the Chinese mainly engaged in passive resistance rather than active confrontation.
Maintaining cultural heritage without assimilation is considered a significant form of passive resistance, creating ethnic enclaves such as Chinatown.
Cultural Identity
Chinatowns emerged as safe havens where Chinese immigrants could maintain their culture and heritage.
These neighborhoods featured Chinese architecture, signage, and cultural practices (e.g., traditional temples, shops).
Economic Self-Reliance
Chinese businesses in Chinatowns thrived as they catered to their communities, often hiring only Chinese workers.
Economic initiatives allowed for a semblance of independence from mainstream American society.
District and Family Associations
Originated to provide social support and preserve culture among Chinese immigrants.
Functions included:
Aiding new arrivals with job placement and housing.
Caring for the sick and poor within the community.
Organizing cultural and social events.
Establishing schools and temples for religious and cultural education.
Role in Resistance
These associations provided a framework to create a supportive community in lieu of government assistance.
Establishment of the Consolidated Chinese Benevolent Association facilitated collective advocacy for Chinese rights.
Education and Newspapers
Founding of private schools for the education of Chinese children who were initially denied access to public education.
The establishment of newspapers shared Chinese cultural updates and later political advocacy amidst rising anti-Chinese sentiments.
Court Cases
Important cases included Tape v. Hurley (1885):
Successfully argued for Chinese children's right to public schooling.
Demonstrated the legal struggle against discrimination despite facing new segregation laws.
Background
Che Changping was denied re-entry to the U.S. despite holding a return certificate due to the Scott Act, which reinforced restrictive immigration laws.
His case highlighted the inadequacies within immigration law and the growing enforcement against Chinese laborers.
Supreme Court Ruling
The Supreme Court ruled against Che, stating it had no jurisdiction over the constitutionality of the Exclusion Acts, prioritizing national security in immigration matters.
This ruling highlighted Congress's control over immigration and set precedents for future discrimination against Chinese immigrants.
Cultural Preservation
Combining efforts through newspapers, education, and community associations allowed Chinese immigrants to preserve their culture in America.
However, these efforts often reinforced separation rather than integration into American society, leading to further persecution.
Legislative Discrimination
Despite resisting discrimination, by the end of this immigrant wave, conditions worsened for Chinese immigrants, contrasting with the experiences of other immigrant groups who effectively navigated assimilation.
The Chinese faced systemic barriers such as ineligibility for citizenship and exclusion from labor unions, preventing upward mobility.
Long-term Outcomes
Although the resistance did not lead to immediate improvements in social status, it laid the groundwork for future generations to work towards greater inclusion.
The Chinese immigrant experience reflects ongoing struggles for identity, civil rights, and recognition in a broader societal context.