O

Genetics, Epigenetics, and Environment - Vocabulary Flashcards

Epigenetics, Gene-Environment Interactions, and Twin Studies — Comprehensive Notes

  • Context and progression

    • Mendelian genetics provides a simple, allele- and gene-centered view of inheritance (simple organisms with few alleles).
    • Charles Darwin introduced natural selection and environmental pressure as drivers of evolution.
    • Genetics basics laid the groundwork; today we extend to complex organisms (e.g., humans) where multiple genes and environmental factors interact.
    • DNA encodes proteins; genes are the portions of DNA that get transcribed and translated into proteins; alleles are different flavors of a gene.
    • Genes are organized into chromosomes; DNA winds around histones to form chromatin; epigenetic mechanisms regulate gene accessibility, not the DNA sequence itself.

  • Core concepts: DNA, genes, alleles, chromosomes, and epigenetics

    • For epigenetics, focus is on DNA packaging and its accessibility to the transcriptional machinery.
    • Epigenetics = mechanisms of inheritance that are not changes to the DNA sequence itself (i.e., not changes to the gene order or base sequence).
    • Chromatin structure affects gene expression: DNA wrapped tightly around histones can be less accessible; loosening or unwinding increases accessibility and expression potential.
    • Epigenetic changes can be heritable across generations, influenced by life experiences and environment, though the exact mechanisms and transmission fidelity are areas of ongoing research.
    • Epigenetic modifications include:
    • DNA methylation (adding methyl groups to DNA) — can tighten or loosen chromatin and influence gene expression.
    • Histone remodeling and post-translational modifications — alter how DNA is wrapped around histones.
    • Acetylation (a type of histone modification) — generally loosens chromatin and increases gene expression accessibility.
    • Environment does not change the DNA sequence itself, but can change how tightly or loosely DNA is packaged, thereby influencing which genes are expressed.

  • The environment’s role in gene expression and inheritance

    • Life experiences and exposures can unwinding or tightening DNA wrap, thereby affecting gene expression in organisms and potentially influencing inheritance patterns.
    • Debates exist about the strength and universality of epigenetic inheritance, but substantial evidence supports that epigenetic states can be influenced by environment and, in some cases, transmitted across generations.
    • Examples of environmental influences include: diet, drugs, smoking, exercise, socioeconomic status, relationships, and brain interactions.

  • Diagrams and examples of epigenetic mechanisms

    • DNA wraps around histones forming nucleosomes; the wrapping state controls gene accessibility.
    • Methylation and acetylation are two key chemical modifications that affect chromatin state:
    • Methylation: attachment of methyl groups to DNA (or histones) influencing gene expression.
    • Acetylation: typically loosens chromatin, increasing gene accessibility and transcription.
    • Both processes can be altered by environmental inputs to regulate protein production necessary for physiological responses.

  • Important real-world implications and examples

    • Parental and grandparental influences: environmental exposures can affect offspring via epigenetic states. For example:
    • Grandmother smoking is correlated with higher obesity rates in first offspring and possibly second offspring, suggesting transgenerational epigenetic effects, though causality is complex and correlations do not prove causation.
    • There are historical observations that famine exposure in grandfathers can correlate with certain health outcomes in grandchildren, illustrating long-range environmental effects.
    • The mechanism remains an active area of study; these examples illustrate how environment interacts with the genome to influence phenotypes.
    • The environment also contributes to the development of metabolic and neurological traits via epigenetic regulation of gene expression.

  • Selective breeding and single-gene disorders as worked examples

    • Selective breeding experiments with animals (e.g., maze-bright vs. maze-dull rats) demonstrate genetic influences on behavior beyond single-trait explanations.
    • Key takeaway: many genes contribute to a single behavior; selecting for one trait can alter a suite of other behavioral and physiological traits (pleiotropy and polygenicity).
    • PKU (phenylketonuria) is a classic single-gene metabolic disorder where a faulty enzyme prevents breakdown of a specific amino acid, leading to developmental issues if untreated.
    • Environmental management (diet) can dramatically alter the outcomes for disorders that are genetically predisposed.

  • PKU: a case study of gene-environment interaction

    • PKU is a metabolic disorder caused by two mutant alleles of a gene encoding an enzyme that normally breaks down phenylalanine.
    • Consequences when untreated: impaired brain development, intellectual disability, behavioral problems, microcephaly, seizures.
    • Newborn screening allows early detection; dietary restriction of phenylalanine (found in milk, cheese, meat, proteins) can prevent or mitigate damage.
    • Even for a single-gene disorder, the environment (diet) can shape outcomes, illustrating that genes do not determine destiny in isolation; environmental control can reduce or modify adverse effects.
    • In families where both parents carry a PKU-associated allele, the probability of an affected child is rac{1}{4} (one in four).
    • After early development, families can adjust diet to maintain health, though ongoing management is usually necessary in childhood and sometimes into adulthood.

  • The debate on “tabula rasa” and experimental evidence

    • Historically, psychologists argued that children are born as a blank slate (tabula rasa).
    • John B. Watson epitomized the blank-slate perspective, arguing environment could shape a child into any role regardless of genetics.
    • Classic animal experiments (maze learning in mice) were used to test this idea; selective breeding showed genetic contributions to learning ability.
    • Key findings from maze experiments:
    • Breeding bright and dull rats over multiple generations yielded a distribution where most offspring were either bright or dull, with a decline of intermediates.
    • This suggests that learning ability has a genetic component and that phenotype distribution can be shifted by selection.
    • Cross-fostering (rearing offspring by the other group's mothers) demonstrated that parental nurturing alone did not fully account for the inherited performance differences; genetic influence remained.
    • However, environmental enrichment or impoverishment affected performance, especially for animals with lower baseline learning ability. Enriched environments reduced errors in dull rats, while bright rats maintained high performance regardless of environment.
    • Conclusions from these experiments:
    • Genes influence behavior, and many genes contribute to a single trait (polygenic inheritance).
    • Environment interacts with genetic predispositions; enrichment can ameliorate some deficits, indicating that environmental interventions can alter outcomes.

  • How genes and environment interact to shape psychological differences

    • Heritability estimates are population-level statistics, not fixed properties of individuals.
    • An individual cannot be decomposed into a fixed percentage of genetic vs. environmental influence;
    • Think of comparing a musician to their instrument: you cannot separate the musician from the instrument to know the exact contribution of each to the music.
    • Group-level estimates allow inferences about populations but cannot be applied to single individuals.
    • Addiction is an example where both genetic predispositions and environmental factors contribute; one cannot deterministically assign a fixed genetic proportion to an individual's behavior.
    • The Minnesota Twin Studies lent strong support to genetic contributions to educational achievement and personality, but later refinements and debates emphasize significant environmental modulation and limitations of early interpretations.

  • Heritability: concept, limits, and interpretation

    • Heritability (H^2) is a statistic that ranges from 0 to 1 (or 0% to 100%), representing the proportion of phenotypic variance in a population attributable to genetic variance:

    • H^2 = rac{VG}{VP} where $VG$ is genetic variance and $VP$ is total phenotypic variance (genetic plus environmental contributions).

    • Important caveats:

    • Heritability is population- and environment-specific; it can change across populations and environments and is not a fixed property of an individual.

    • Estimates depend on socioeconomic and developmental contexts; more favorable environments can increase or decrease the apparent heritability of traits like intelligence.

    • Practical examples from studies:

    • In a high-SES group (middle/high SES) of seven-year-old twins, intelligence showed about H^2 ext{ (intelligence) }
      ightarrow 0.70 (70%) due to genetics, whereas in a low-SES group, the genetic contribution dropped to around 0.10 (10%), indicating stronger environmental influence in less advantaged contexts.

    • This demonstrates that heritability is not absolute and can be highly context-dependent.

    • Global observations of schizophrenia illustrate gene-environment interactions: identical twins such that if one twin has schizophrenia, the other has it about 0.48 (48%) of the time; the other twin does not have it about 0.52 (52%) of the time, suggesting non-genetic factors (e.g., epigenetic methylation changes affecting glutamatergic/dopaminergic systems) play a significant role.

    • Recent twin-study designs attempt to better control environments and separate genetic from environmental factors, but even these are limited by residual environmental differences and the impossibility of perfectly isolating gene and environment for an individual.

  • Twin studies: monozygotic vs. dizygotic, reared together vs. apart

    • Definitions:
    • Monozygotic (MZ) twins: arise from a single fertilized egg that splits; share essentially 100% of their DNA.
    • Dizygotic (DZ) twins: arise from two separate fertilized eggs; share about 50% of their DNA (like regular siblings).
    • Common methodological framework:
    • Compare similarity in traits between MZ twins and DZ twins to estimate genetic influence, given that DZ twins generally share similar environments.
    • Classic Minnesota Twin Studies: large samples of MZ and DZ pairs, some raised together, some raised apart.
    • Key finding: MZ twins are more similar than DZ twins on intellectual and personality measures, indicating genetic contributions, even when raised in the same environment.
    • Important caveats and ethical considerations:
    • The assumption that DZ twins share environments identical to MZ twins is imperfect; visual similarity or perceived identity does not guarantee identical environmental experiences.
    • In twin-adoption or rearing-apart studies (e.g., Identical Strangers), ethical issues arise when private organizations conduct such studies without oversight; government regulation and ethics review are essential.
    • Notable studies and concepts:
    • Minnesota Twins Reared Apart: multiple pairs showed greater similarity in intelligence and personality among MZ pairs than DZ pairs, even when raised apart, supporting genetic influence but recognizing environmental contributions.
    • Identical Strangers (case study): three infant twins separated at birth and raised in different socioeconomic environments; later analyses highlighted how environment shapes outcomes and trajectories, including athletic tendencies and life choices, underscoring the ethical concerns and complexities of such research.
    • Implications for interpretation:
    • If MZ twins reared apart show strong similarities, genes contribute to those traits; if they diverge, environmental influences are substantial.
    • Twin studies cannot fully separate gene and environment for individuals; they mainly inform about average effects in groups.

  • The role of environment in shaping cognitive and behavioral outcomes

    • Environmental context (nutrition, education, social capital, enrichment opportunities) can dramatically influence cognitive development and behavior.
    • Enriched environments (e.g., homes with books and stimulating materials) correlate with better learning outcomes across populations, supporting the idea that the environment can enhance potential, particularly for individuals with lower baseline abilities.
    • The equalization of environments can reduce the apparent genetic contribution to certain traits, illustrating how context moderates heritability estimates.

  • Practical implications for psychology, neuroscience, and public policy

    • When discussing psychological differences, avoid attributing individuals’ traits to fixed genetic components; use population-level interpretations carefully and acknowledge environmental mediation.
    • Epigenetics highlights that brain development and behavior are shaped by an ongoing dialogue between genome and environment, with feedback loops where experience alters gene expression patterns that influence future responses.
    • In clinical and educational settings, emphasize environmental interventions (nutrition, stimulation, supportive contexts) as powerful levers for improving outcomes, even for individuals with genetic predispositions.

  • Key terms and concepts to remember

    • Epigenetics, epigenetic mechanisms, chromatin, histones, DNA methylation, acetylation, chromatin remodeling, gene expression, environment, inheritance without DNA sequence changes.
    • Genes, alleles, DNA, chromosomes.
    • SNPs (Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms) and mutations as sources of genetic variation.
    • PKU (phenylketonuria) as a single-gene metabolic disorder with environmental management via diet.
    • Heritability (H^2), population-specific estimates, limitations, and context dependence.
    • Monozygotic (MZ) vs. Dizygotic (DZ) twins; reared together vs. apart; the Minnesota Twin Studies; Identical Strangers.
    • Environmentally enriched vs. impoverished conditions and their differential effects on behavior.
    • Tabula rasa and the historical debate about the relative influence of genes and environment.

  • Summary takeaways

    • Genes provide the biological potential, but the environment can enable, constrain, or reshape how that potential is realized through epigenetic mechanisms that regulate gene expression.
    • Heritability estimates are powerful for understanding groups, not individuals, and they depend on environmental context.
    • Twin studies offer valuable insights into the balance of genetic and environmental influences, but they are not definitive for individuals and must be interpreted with caution and ethical considerations.
    • Real-world health outcomes (e.g., PKU) demonstrate that even strong genetic predispositions can be mitigated or altered through environmental management, underscoring the practical emphasis on environmental interventions.