LAWS101: Term 1, Lesson 1

Previous Class Recap

  • Discussion of Tragedy at Sea:

    • Students engaged in group discussions about dilemmas faced by Captain Dudley and his crew in a survival scenario.

    • Two scenarios presented:

      • Killing and eating the cabin boy (Dudley’s act).

      • Eating the cabin boy after his death (Brooks’ choice).

  • Student Feedback:

    • Mixed responses about their willingness to eat the cabin boy based on whether he was alive or dead.

    • Major moral consideration: the act of killing versus consuming a body that is already deceased.

Moral and Legal Implications

  • Core Moral Questions:

    • The implications of taking another's life can create intense moral conflict.

    • Ideas of what constitutes moral integrity and the inherent objection to murder.

  • Guilt vs. Innocence:

    • Most students agreed that Dudley and Stevens would be guilty of murder.

    • Key legal consideration: Elements of murder include malice aforethought and sound mind state as defined by English law in 1884.

Legal Burdens in Trials

  • Prosecution's Role:

    • Must prove every element beyond a reasonable doubt.

  • Defense's Role:

    • Can introduce evidence to show a defense or challenge the prosecution’s proof.

    • Discussion of possible defenses: self-defense vs. necessity.

Judicial Decision in the Case

  • Judge Lord Coleridge:

    • Ruled against the self-defense claim due to lack of threat posed by the deceased cabin boy.

    • Rejected the necessity defense, establishing that necessity is not a valid defense to murder.

  • Outcome of the Case:

    • Dudley and Stevens were initially sentenced to death but were later commuted to six months due to public sympathy.

    • Historical note on the aftermath of the crew:

      • Dudley died in Sydney from the plague.

      • Stevens suffered from alcoholism.

      • Brooks became a witness against them and later joined a traveling circus.

Reflections on Law and Morality

  • Interrelation of Law and Morality:

    • Coleridge’s perspective that law and morality must not be completely divorced; separation may lead to chaos.

    • Exploration of personal morality vs. legal definitions influencing students' choices in hypothetical scenarios.

Understanding Law and Its Contexts

  • What is Law?:

    • Various definitions articulated – social control, regulation of relationships, normative standards.

    • The essence of law as a reflection of societal values and human relationships.

  • Jurisprudence: Understanding law through the lens of legal philosophy and its implications for society.

Future Discussions

  • Purpose of Law & Classifications:

    • Next lecture will focus on the purposes and classifications of law.

  • Essay Assignment:

    • Students encouraged to reflect on the relationship between law and morality in their upcoming assignments.

robot