Thinking - any mental activity or processing of information
→ such as learning
cognitive miser- tries to reduce mental effort
“System 1 thinking” → automatic, quick, intuitive
learned the piano years ago and then sit down to play
Lots of the way we process information
Can backfire
“System 2 thinking” → controlled, effortful
really thinking about something
trying to learn the piano for the first time
Quick thinking
Predictions are frequently accurate
Looking at someone’s face can tell what kind of music the person listens to
Can lead to cognitive biases
stereotyping individuals → not necessarily accurate
Miss small details/make poor judgement
Heuristics
mental shortcuts/rule of thumb
Can be inaccurate
Can easily be counteracted
Easy to change
Mental shortcut aimed at saving mental energy
Can be correct
Representative heuristic
guessing how likely X is, based on how superficially similar it is to Y
Sounds like the prototype of a certain position → personality traits, hobbies
We ignore base rates → how common a characteristic is in the real world
Based on mental models that already exist in our minds/stereotypes
How much does a certain event/person represent a prototype in our minds
Availability heuristic
guessing how likely X is, based upon how easily you can think of an instance where X occurs
How available a memory is in your mind
How quickly a memory pops into your mind
The more media coverage, the more likely one is to assume it occurs more often → what feels safer: driving your car or flying a plane
Estimate the probability of something
Cognitive biases
systematic errors in thinking
Not easy to change → because it is systematic
Fundamental issue in the way we think
Not aimed at conserving mental energy
Hindsight bias
overestimating your ability to have predicted known outcomes
After knowing the result of something, you exaggerate how much you actually know about the result → “I knew they were going to win”
confident they always knew it
I knew it all along effect → Make you feel the lessons you learn you already know (in a class)
Ex. When a famous couple breaks up or when the Oilers win a hockey game
lure into a false sense of security
Confirmation bias
tendency to seek out information that aligns with our beliefs and neglecting conflicting evidence
blackout/distort any conflicting information
Not seek out information that would conflict their train of thought
Downplay/forget information
Look for news that supports our thinking
We like people who agree with us → surround ourselves with likeminded individuals
Top-down processing
filling in gaps of information based on our preexisting knowledge
System 1 thinking
We have our own ideas of how certain groups should act etc
Adding something to what we already know
Two types:
Concepts - knowledge of particular “sets” which share core properties
The concept of an apple → they are all apples
Particular set of objects that all share core properties → we all sit in chairs
Schemas - knowledge of how particular actions, objects, and ideas are related
how the concepts fit together/are related → apples and bananas are both fruit, the role of a dog owner
Person or group schemas → stereotyping
Canadians, professors, dog owner, how to host a dinner party, events (how to act)
Self schema → oilers fan, from Edmonton, student (System 1)
Both are apart of the cognitive economy
Bottom up processing
starting with nothing, then receiving information and building opinion from there
System 2 thinking
Decision making - process of selecting between a set of possible options
Made in subconscious (implicit), to reserve cognitive economy
Long term (system 2) vs short term (system 1) impacts
We make so many decision we sometimes don’t think about them
Consequential decisions = thinking more
Thinking deeply/overanalyzing decisions can be problematic
Gut decisions are better → lead people to be happier with their choices
Our brain gets overwhelmed with too much information → can’t make a good decision/emotional decision
Framing - how information is presented
framing of facts and information can significantly influence our decisions
Problem solving - creating a cognitive strategy to accomplish a goal
series of stages that represent the cognitive process of problem solving
Situation where there is a difference between where you’re at and where you’re at later on
Stages
Identify the problem
→ ill-defined solution - there is not one correct solution, can vary (getting dressed)→ well-defined solution
→ well-defined solution - has one correct answer, you know what you have to do (sudoku)
Define the problem
→ functional fixedness - difficulty conceptualizing that an object can be used for multiple purpose
Develop a solution
→ trial and error strategy
Algorithms - step by step guide that does not change → there are situations where they do not work/is disrupted
Insight - suddenly realizing a solution
→ obstacles
Salience - focus on superficial/surface level similarities between problems → we might try to solve them in the same way (different algebra problems about trains or young children and dogs)
Mental set - becoming stuck on a proven strategy or being confined to previous ideas, and being unable to generate new alternatives → using the same strategy over and over and over again
Allocate resources
→ problem solving involves (constrained by our cognitive system)
Attention → how long can you focus on the problem itself
Long-term memory → drawing from things we learned a long time ago (how to make a sandwich, tying your shoes)
Working memory capacity → have to be able to have it in the front of our mind in order to be able to solve the problem
Expert → the more expert you are at the problem, the easier you will be able to solve it (use more effective problem solving strategies because have gone through the process already)
Monitor progress
→ take home message - “look back and learn”
→ evaluate how you solve the problem
Language - combines symbols (words, gestures) to create meaning
Follows agreed-upon rules
Entirely arbitrary
No good reason why we use the words we use
Helps express emotion and maintain social ties
Phoneme - the sounds used in a language
Changes to vocal apparatus produces different phonemes
Shoe vs cheese
Morphemes - Smallest unit that provide information
Convey information about semantics
Can we words or word modifiers
Apple, help, teach, re-, ish-
Syntax - the rules that govern how sounds should be combined to form sentences
Word order
Morphological markers
Change the meaning of words (adding -ed, -ing,)
Sentence structure
→ commonly ignored
Extralinguistic information - parts of communication that exist outside of the language content, but influences interpretation
Non-verbal cues
Tone of voice
The nerdy psychologist made a video
Does the sentence follow proper syntax → yes
How many morphemes does psychologist have? → 3
How many phonemes does the word video have? → 5
Dialects - differences in the use of the same language by different groups
Newfinese
Influenced by geographical location, culture
Evolution:
Disadvantages
Lengthy learning period
Large mental space/energy requirement
Advantages
Allows communication of complex ideas
Helped coordination of social interactions
→ Phoneme, morphemes, and syntax are arbitrary
Is the arbitrary nature a good thing?
We can come up with new words and ways to describe things
→ Words may not always be arbitrary
Onomatopoeia - buzz, meow, beep
Sound symbolism - certain speech sounds associated with a particular meaning
Learning language;
Babies in utero (5 months) recognize their mother’s voice and some songs/stories
At 2 days old, babies respond to their mother’s native language using high amplitude sucking procedure
Captures how hard the baby is sucking on the pacifier
By the end of year 1, babies start babbling → comprehension precedes production
Babies can recognize words before they can produce them
By their first birthday, children start producing their first words
By their second birthday, most children can produce several hundred words
Underextend - when children apply words in a narrow sense
“Flower” refers to only a rose
“Ball” refers to only their red ball
Overextend - children apply words in a broad sense
“Truck” for all vehicles
“Apple” for all round food
Learning Syntax:
Begin at the one word stage
Dog, juice, mom
Same word used for multiple meanings
Combine two words around 2 years old
Follow syntactic rules
Big Bird and the Cookie Monster study
Which photo is associated with the video
Sign language - relies on visual communication
Uses hands, face, body, and “sign space” (the space in front of the communicator)
Same brain areas are used
Developmental stages are unchanged
Bilingualism - being proficient and fluent at speaking and comprehending two distinct languages
Learning another language is easier when:
Living with native speakers
Motivated
Younger
Bilingual children syntactic development is slightly slower
Explanation for children’s learning:
→ Nature - biological
→ Nurture - learned
Language deprivation suggests there is a period of time where language development is crucial → the case of “Genie”
Home signers - children with hearing loss whose parents do not know sign language
Develop their own rudimentary language → inventing their own signs
Nature vs Nurture:
Critical periods - able to learn a language better with earlier exposure
age of immigration
Sensitive period - “less is more” hypothesis
The earlier you learn it, the more likely you are to learn a language
Can learn a language easier
Less is more hypothesis
Suggests it is easier to learn a language from the ground up → with no prior knowledge
Accounts of Language Acquisition:
Pure nature/nurture account
Children learn through imitation
Hear language according to language rules, so we follow it and are reinforced for using language correctly
→ problem = does not account for the generative aspects of language
Nativist account (strongly nature)
Children are born with basic knowledge of language
Noam Chomsky’s language acquisition device
construct in the brain that is pre programmed with universal parameters of language
→ problem = unfalsifiable
Very hard to test whether people have a language acquisition device in their brains
Social pragmatics account (largely nurture)
Child infers the meaning of the words by observing how people use words in conversation
Context and figuring out what word applies to which thing
→ problem = parsimony
We always prefer the simplest explanation → this theory is not simple
General cognitive processing account
The development of language is an expression for the same vernal l children have for other abilities
Children are good at learning things
→ problem = contradictory evidence
Researchers have settled on #3 and #4 for the most correct/reasonable
Non-human Animal Communication:
Different forms and purposes for communication in animals
Scents, visual, and vocal
Less generative and complex than human communication
Mating, food, aggression, predators
Human communication is much more generative
Coming up with new communication
→ Chimpanzees
Can learn rudimentary language
Never master syntax
Requires a lot more repetition and rewards
→ Bonobos
More similar to human learning
Do better when they are young
Learn a lot through observation
Use symbols
No syntax
→ African grey parrot
Not understanding what they are saying
Imitation of what they heard before
Lots of reinforcement
Reading:
Very automated and difficult to turn off
Stroop task
To master reading:
Understand whole words
Whole-word recognition
How to sound out unfamiliar words
Phonetic decomposition
Need to understand format of reading
Right to left
Top to bottom
Intelligence - reflection of your senses
Knowledge comes through the senses, and therefore, individuals with stronger sense are more intelligent
However, strength of one sense does not correlate with intelligence
Intelligence Test (Alfred Binet and Theodore Simon):
Used to differentiate students who were falling behind peers
Used diverse items that together helped measure higher mental processes
General vs Specific Abilities:
→ Charles Spearman noted that items on a intelligence test correlate
Some underlying factor should account for this
g is the underlying intelligence — “mental energy”
s are the specific abilities that fall within g
Fluid and Crystallized:
→ Raymond Cattell and John Horn
Fluid intelligence - ability to learn new ways to solve problems
Used when mastering new tasks
Crystallized intelligence - knowledge we have acquired over time
Used to recite facts
Multiple Intelligences:
→ Howard Gardner’s “Frames of Mind”
Different frames of mind have different way of viewing the world
Each type should be relatively independent, and verifiable from studies of brain damage and autistic savants
Intelligence Types:
Linguistic - speak and write well
Logico mathematical - use logic and mathematical skills to solve problems, such as scientific questions
Spatial - think and reason about objects in three dimensional space
Musical - perform, understand, and enjoy music
Bodily kinaesthetic - manipulate the body in sports, dance, or other physical endeavours
Interpersonal - understand and interact effectively with others
Intrapersonal - understand and possess insight into self
Naturalistic - recognize, identify, and understand animals, plants, and other living things
Triarchic Model (Robert Sternberg):
Analytical intelligence - ability to reason logically, traditional “book smarts”, g
Practical intelligence - ability to solve real world problems, especially socially
Creative intelligence - ability to create novel and effective answers
Weaknesses:
Practical intelligence is related to g
The measures of practical intelligence may be considered measures of job knowledge
Measuring Intelligence:
Self reports do not work
Double curse of incompetence
Poor cognitive skills lead to poor metacognition and therefore, poor estimation one’s intelligence
→ Lewis Terman
1916 — Stanford-Binet Intelligence Test
Established norms
Typical scored from large groups of people at different ages
Norms are used to compare Person X to peers
→ What is IQ?
Intelligence quotient
Wilhelm Stern
Mental age is the “age” corresponding to the persons performance
Mental age / chronological age X 100 = IQ
→ know this formula for the midterm
→ Reformulating IQ
Works well for children, but not for adults
IQ formula needed to be revised
Deviation IQ
Compares each person to what is normal for their age, with an average of 100
Bell curve - intelligence follows a normalized distribution in most populations
Most people will be pretty close to 100
Wechsler test
Wechsler adult intelligence scale (WASIS-IV)
15 subtests that can generate 5 main scores:
Full scale IQ → g score, overall intelligence
Perpetual reasoning → spatial awareness skills
Working memory → how much information can you hold in your mind at one time
Verbal comprehension → ability to use and understand language
Processing speed → how fast can you think through something
Wechsler intelligence scale for children
Wechsler preschool and primary scale of intelligence
Used for kids 16 and older
Examples:
Who is the president of the United States?
Possible item from the information subtext
Measures general knowledge
Why should people be tested to get a driver’s license?
Possible inter from the comprehension subtext
Measure’s understanding of social conventions and use of past experiences
Complete the empty spaces using the legend
Possible item from digit symbol subtest
Measures speed of learning and processing speed
Which two pieces can be combined to make the object above?
Possible item from visual puzzles subtest
Measures spacial abilities, mental organization
Perceptual reasoning index
Repeat this number set after me…
Possible item form digit span subtest
Measures attention and short-term memory
What does the word repugnant mean?
Possible item from vocabulary subtest
Measures verbal intelligence
Crystallized intelligence
→ intelligence tests must be standardized
Must be done at the same speed and same way
Reliability of IQ Scores:
For adults, intelligence scores tend to be extremely stabile
Very high correlations, regardless of test-retest duration
Very low correlations between intelligence scores taken before age 3 and adult correlations
However, speed of habituation in infants is related to adult intelligence
Getting bored of looking at an image (habituating to it) → the faster you habituate, the higher IQ they will have
Validity of IQ Scores:
Strong concurrent validity
Do other intelligence tests agree with each other
Convergent validity
Are you measuring the thing you say you are measuring
Correlation is high between different intelligence measures
Predicative validity
Does the test tell you about the person in the real world
Real world criteria
Correlations:
0.5> = strong relationship
.30 - .50 = moderate/medium relationship
.10 -. 30 = weak relationship
.00 - .10 = no relationship
→ intelligence is the best predictor of how well you will do in life (school, work)
Strong predictive validity
Positively associated with health related outcomes
People with higher IQ tend to be healthier
Negatively associated with criminal tendencies
Socioeconomic status
What are your parents’ jobs?
What neighbourhood do you live in?
Environment Influences:
Children from larger families may have lower intelligence
Have less opportunities/parents don’t have as much money
People with higher intelligence wait to have children and have less children
If you believe intelligence is “fixed”, may be less likely to challenge yourself academically and mentally
“I suck at this and there is nothing I can do about it”
Versus a growth mindset → “I will work and get better”
More education may lead to higher intelligence
Children with more time in school score higher on intelligence tests than children of the same age with less school
IQ score decrease when out of school
Kids who start school earlier boost IQ
Bloomer study
Psychologist lie to teachers and tell them a specific kid is going to be smart → teachers treat them differently
→ if your teacher expects you to be smart, may add a minor boost to intelligence
Head start program
Gave disadvantaged preschool chilled access to enriched educational environments
After program ended, the kids’ IQs went back down
Hoped it would help them “catch up”
Provided a short-term boost to IQ score
If you give people equal opportunity, their IQs match
Had high emotional intelligence
Able to regulate their emotions better
Poverty
Arthur Jensen’s cumulative deficit study
Older siblings had lower intelligence than younger siblings → the older child has lived longer not having resources (younger child has not had intelligence sucked out yet)
Lead poisoning
Has a clear detrimental effect on intelligence
Breastfeeding
Boosts IQ scores, but could be de to SES
→ Women who have time to breastfeed often are able to go on long-term maternity leave/have enough money to take a year off
Biology and Intellect:
Brain volume and intelligence
r = .30 - .40
Stronger for verbal abilities than spatial abilities
Moderate correlation, but may not be casual
Bigger brain is better → more connections to different aspects of the brain
→ Einstein is the exception - small, but FULL of connections
Smarter brains may be more efficient brains
Reaction time
Overall activity
Working memory
Moderately to strongly correlated with intelligence tests than
Ability to hold multiple things in your mind at one time
→ Tetris study and reaction time boxes study (pg. 340-341)
Prefrontal cortex is highly active when engaging in “g-loaded” tasks”
Parietal lobe is related to spatial reasoning
Awareness of your body
Able to move shapes around in your head
Genes and IQ:
Intelligence runs in families
Family studies show significant correlation
Identical twins IQ, r = .70 - .80
Fraternal twins/siblings IQ, r = .30 - .50
Same as any brother and sister
Cousins IQ, r = .15
→ heritability of IQ is 40%-70%, and becomes higher in adulthood
→ genes account for about 50% of people’s IQ
Identical twins reared apart are as similar on intelligence tests as identical twins reared together
Adoption studies
If leaving a deprived environment, intelligence will increase
Adopted children’s intelligence is more closely related to biological parents than adopted parents, especially with age
Eugenics:
Intelligence tests were used to determine who was “feeble-minded”, “dumb”, etc
Belief in biological basis of intelligence led to a fear of the “low IQ” of immigrants, minorities, and others, mixing with the majority populations
It will “dumb down” the population (lose IQ)
Positive eugenics vs negative eugenics
Positive - offering something to people to have children
Money, support, encouraging smart people
Negative - Stopping someone from having children
Sterilizing people with low IQ
→ sexual sterilization act lead to over 2800 individuals being sterilized from 1928 to 1972
Flynn Effect
Discovered by James Flynn in the 1980s
Average IQ scores rise by approximately 3 points every decade
→ environmental influences
Increased experience with test
However, finding is stronger or uncommon tests
More information processing required in modern life
Improved nutrition
Improvements at home
Improvements in education
Mental Giftedness:
Top 2% of IQ (Mensa criteria)
Tend to reside in “higher” occupations
Terman’s “termites”
1500 junior high students with IQs of 135+
Many eared prestigious degrees
Lower rates of mental illness and suicide
May be a link to between worry/rumination and verbal intelligence
While genes play a role, dedication and practice are essential
Rare that insights com without substantial effort
Intellectual Disability:
→ three general criteria
Childhood onset
Deficits in intellectual functioning
Previously stated as IQ below functioning
Deficit in adaptive functioning
Have a hard time living independently, communicating, dressing themselves
→ often lose the diagnosis as life skills are developed
→ mild (55-70), moderate (45-55), severe and profound
Mild - immature social judgement
Severe
Rare genetic mutations
Birth accidents
Fragile X syndrome
Mutation on X chromosome
Nearly half meet criteria for autism
Boys are at higher risks
Down syndrome
Extra copy of chromosome 21
Most have mild to moderate intellectual disability
Likelihood increases with mother’s age
Sex Differences & IQ
Very few, if any, differences between men and women on average
However, men have a wider distribution of scores
Differences do appear to exist in a few specific aspects of intelligence
Women tend to do better with verbal tasks, arithmetic, and recognizing emotions
Men tend to do better with spatial abilities and mathematical reasoning
Biology as a casual agent
Estrogen related to verbal abilities
Testosterone related to spatial abilities
Yet, environment plays a major role
Infants show few differences
Different problem-solving strategies
Gender roles ands stereotypes
Racial Differences and IQ:
Common findings
Asian-Americans score higher than Caucasians
Jews score higher than non-Jew
African-Americans and Hispanics sore lower than Caucasians
Non-indigenous recruits in the Canadian Forces scored higher in verbal abilities than First Nation member from remote areas
Many have argued for genetic and evolutionary support for origins
Not due to “racial superiority”
IQ scores gap is shrinking
Substantial overlap in overall distributions
World War II study
Social deprivation, prejudice etc lead to differences
Within-group heritability
How much the variability of a trait in a group is due to genes
Between-group heritability
How much the difference in a trait between groups is due to genes
Differences between groups are largely environmental
Within-group differences may be at least partially genetic
Does stereotype threat play a role?
Influences behaviour in research, but unclear whether it plays a role in the real world
Genes play little role in group differences
“Culture-Fair” IQ Testing:
Heavy reliance on language has always been criticized
Could culture or language be negatively impacting IQ scores?
Raven’s progressive matrices
What pattern complete the sequence
American vs Canadian knowledge
Just because something looks bias, doesn’t mean there is
Creativity:
Requires divergent thinking
Ability to generate many alternative solutions
“Use of an Object Test”
Also requires convergent thinking
Ability to generate the best solution
Weak to moderate association with standard IQ test
Emotional Intelligence:
Ability to recognize an regulate emotions in our selves and others
Specific components are debated and depend on the model of EI
May be considered a personality trait or a skill
May be used to manipulate and lie
Does not appear to improve predictions of job performance
Weak predictor of general intelligence
Developmental psychology - the study of how humans change over the lifespan
How behaviour and mental processes trained across one’s life
Personality
Physiology
Behaviour
Research methods in developmental psychology:
Cross sectional design - people from different age groups are all compared at the exact same time
Giving a memory test to a certain age group → give people the same test
Cost effective
Only need to run the test once
Cohort effect - systematic difference between different age groups
Experiences of COVID could influence
Longitudinal design - the same group of people are studied over a long period of time
Giving 10 year olds and memory test and then giving them the same test 5 years later
Very expensive and takes up time
Result are going to be more trustworthy → eliminates cohort effect
Gallup happiness study
340 847 individuals between 18-85 years old
Result → before age 50, happiness decreases
Cross-sectional study
Edmonton transition study
Collected samples of data from two different groups
1. High school seniors followed from age 18-43
2. University seniors followed from age 23-37
→ result = happiness increased into 30s in both samples, with a slight downturn by age 43 in the high school example
Longitudinal
Challenges in developmental psychology:
Cohorts - a group born around the same time, who would have similar cultural experiences
Knowing how to use a rotary phone
Post-hoc fallacy - logical error where you assume A cause B, only because A came before B
Just because two events happen in the same order doesn’t mean it directly caused what came after it
Ex. Children who are read to at a very young age grow up to be very good at reading and do better in school later
Bidirectional influences - human development is rarely linear
Parents have a strong impact on their child’s behaviour, but the behaviour will impact the parent
We can’t really know what effects what
The influence of early experiences (MYTHS)
Infant determinism
indicates that the first three years of life are the most influential in shaping adult behaviour
Childhood fragility
children are easily damaged/fragile creatures → we must protect them at all costs
Nature-nurture debate
Nature via nurture
Genetic predisposition drive us to select particular environments
The children can seek out environment that fits their genetic predisposition
Gene expression
The activation/deactivation of genes by environmental experiences
Gene-environment interaction
There is an ongoing interaction between our genetics and our environment
Make looking at causal claims for difficult
Chronological age is not especially related to behavioural and biological changes
Other types of age are better predictors
Biological age
→ estimate of a person’s based on biological functioning
Psychological age
→ person’s mental attitude/ability to function in high stress environment
Functional age
→ Person’s biliary to function in a given roles in society
Social age
→ Whether people behave in accordance with social behaviours that are appropriate for their age
Physical development
Contributes to cognitive and social development
How your brain grows
Cognitive Development:
How we acquire the ability to learn, think, reason etc
Differ
Stage-like changes(sudden changes or jumps in cognitive development skills) vs continuous changes (as you move throughout life, cognitive develops)
Domain-general (al cognitive skills rise together) vs domain-specific (different skills develop individually)
Primary source of learning
Jean Piaget
Domain-general theory of development
All cognitive skills develop together but there are also skills that develop individually
Children aren’t miniature adults
Don’t learn the same way adults learn
Assimilation - absorbing new experiences into current schemas
Requires that children add new information to what they already know without changing the understanding of the schema
Any four-leg small animal is a dog
Accommodation - altering a schema to make it more compatible with experiences
Requires child to create or modify the existing schema
Much larger/bigger examples
Santa isn’t real → have to come up with a new schema
Basic process of thinking children go through while experiencing new experiences
Piaget’s Stages of Development:
Sensorimotor Stage (birth - 2 years)
Lack of object permanence
If the object can’t be seen anymore, it doesn’t exist anymore
→ test - whether a child reaches for a toy they were previously playing with it
Lack differed imitation
Inability to imitate
Focused on current physical environment
→ will move on from this stage when they can do both of these things
Pre-operational Stage (2 - 7 years)
Show egocentrism
Only see the world from your perspective
Theory of mind → recognizing you have different perspective
Can use mental representations
Start to take on imaginary roles (play with their dolls)
Struggle to change representation (what happens when the doll breaks?)
Lack of conservation
Knowing objects retains heir basic value/amount even though they might change shape or orientation
→ different sized beaker, the taller one has more water even though they actually have the same amounT - related more to maturation
Concrete Operations Stage (7 - 11 years)
Can pass conservation task
Can sort/create scenes with physical objects
Struggle with abstract reasoning
Can only think about one way to solve a problem
Formal Operations Stage Stage (11 - adult):
Engages in hypothetical reasoning
Understands if-then and either-or statements
Thinks about abstract questions
Strengths:
Recognizes that children are not mini-adults
Learning as an active process
Explored general cognitive process to explain changes to multiple domains
Weaknesses:
Development is continuous
Underestimated children’s abilities
Ability to detect object permanence
Hard to replicate in ways that do not rely on language
Ignored language ability
It is a stage model (specific age timeline)
Restrictive
Lev Vygotsky:
Scaffolding - caretakers work with children in a way that guides them along during tasks and learning opportunities
Really focused on the social interaction
Focusing on a students ability to learn information with the help of a knowledgeable individual
Zone of proximal development
Where a child is ready to learn a new skill → use the assistance to teach a child more and more
Riding a bike → need to walk before they can learn to ride a bike
Finding ways to slowly introduce the child to a new skill
→ did not believe in stages, instead that children learn and develop on their own
Cognitive changes:
Childhood
Self-recognition
Theory of mind
Counting and math
Adolescence
Frontal lobe maturing
More active limbic system
Processing emotions
Experiencing peer-pressure
Personal fable
Adolescences think they are special and unique compared to other people
Late adulthood
Cognitive decline in recall, processing sped
Vocabulary and crystallized intelligence increases
Stress - the tension, discomfort, or physical symptoms that arise when a stressor strains our ability to cope
Stressor - a stimulus in our environment that provokes stress
Traumatic event - extreme stressor that causes long-term psychological or health consequences
Three Ways of Studying Stress:
stressors as stimuli
identifying types of stressors
which people respond the most to certain types of stress
disasters that affect whole communities
stress as a transaction
how people interpret and cope with stressors
primary appraisal
secondary appraisal
problem-focused coping vs emotion-focused coping
stress as a response
physical and psychological responses to stressors
variables that could be examined
hopelessness
depression
hostility
changes in corticosteroids/cortisol
Measuring Stress:
Social Readjustment Rating Scale (SRRS)
number of major life events in the past year
moderate predictive validity
however has several limitations
Hassles Scale
frequency and severity of daily stressors/minor annoyances
better predictor of physical health, depression, and anxiety than the SRRS
Physiological response to stress:
General Adaptive Syndrome (Hans Selye)
→ phase 1 - alarm reaction
limbic system activates
stress hormones releases (HPA axis)
autonomic nervous system activates
physical symptoms of anxiety develop
→ phase 2 - resistance
adapt and cope with stressor
physical symptoms may still occur
→ phase 3 - exhaustion
breakdown of resistance
physical symptoms may change/intensify
Diversity of Stress Responses:
women are more likely to tend-and-benefit than men
evolutionary advantage
post traumatic stress disorder
vivid memories
heightened startle response
depression-like symptoms
→ symptoms predicted by:
number of events
severity, nearness, & duration
lack of social/family support
Coping with stress:
social support and mortality rates
social support includes family, friends, religious membership, and other community groups
proactive coping - trying to prevent or minimize an anticipated stressful event
a sense of control decreases stress
→ five types of control:
behavioural control → problem focused coping
cognitive control → emotion focused coping
decisional control
informational control
emotional control → expression and suppression
catharsis - sudden emotional release of stress
critical incident stress debriefing (crisis debriefing) - a single session treatment immediately following trauma
must describe negative emotions in detail
if forced, may cause PTSD
individual differences
hardiness
seeing changes as a challenge, not a threat
believing you can control events
optimism
focus on the positives
leads people to be more productive, focused, and handle frustration better
spirituality
feeling connected to a higher power
positive outcomes may be due to social nature, rejection of vices, and/or sense of meaning and control
rumination and worry
endlessly over-thinking past and future events
flexible coping
important to change coping strategies as the situation changes
suppressing/avoiding emotions or specific stressors is generally NOT helpful
Stress and the immune system:
the immune system - the body’s natural defence against invading bacteria, viruses, and other illness-producing organisms
includes the skin and other means used to expel pathogens
phagocytes
lymphocytes (T and B cells)
macrophages
can be compromised by disorders (eg. AIDS)
some disorders cannot be contained by the immune system (eg. cancer)
immune system can become overactive creating autoimmune diseases (eg. multiple sclerosis)
psychoneuroimmunology - the relationship between the immune system and the central nervous system
stress and developing a cold
the stress of someone who cares for an individual with Alzheimer’s
it can takes weeks/months for immune system to go back to normal after stress is removed
Stress-related illnesses:
many diseases are biopsychosocial in origin and maintenance
psychophysiological illnesses (psychosomatic)
stress plays a role in the disease/keeps it going
peptic ulcers → caused by bacteria
coronary heart disease → associated with multiple psychological characteristics
stress → direct and indirect effects (immediate impact vs long-term)
type A personality → hostility (really connects to heart disease)
→ impatient, aggressive, competitive, ambitious
→ direct and indirect pathways
Healthy living:
health psychology (behavioural medicine) integrates behavioural sciences with medicine
includes education and psychological interventions
promotes having good health, as well as preventing and treating illness
stop smoking
only 5-10% successfully quit when doing it on their own
25-35% can quit when using methods from health psychologists
easy to go back to
curb alcohol consumption
severe withdrawals from regular consumption
binge drinking (heavy episodic drinking) is associated with increases in cancer, liver problems, pregnancy complications, and brain shrinkage
achieve a healthy weight
roughly 35-45% of Canadians are overweight or obese
based on body-mass index (BMI)
obesity is associated with:
→ heart disease and stroke
→ cancer
→ diabetes
→ depression, anxiety, and social issues
obtaining (and keeping) a healthy weight:
→ avoid fads and crash diets (yo-yo effect)
→ exercise regularly
→ monitor total calories and body weight
→ eat properly (good fats, low salt, high fibre)
→ get social support
→ control portions
→ reward your achievements
exercise
lowers blood pressure and risk for coronary heart disease
relieves arthritis
decreases diabetes risk, breast cancer, colon cancer
30 minutes several times a week is best
→ up to 80% of patients do not follow their doctor’s advice
personal inertia
under-estimate the risks
feelings powerless
→ prevention
psycho education around peer-pressure and risks
introduction of good role models
effective coping skills
D.A.R.E general not effective
Complementary & Alternative Medicines (CAM):
alternative medicines - using a health care practice/product instead of conventional medicines
complimentary med ideas - using heath care practice/product instead addition to conventional medicine
biologically based CAMS
most herbal supplements are no more effective than placebo
St. John’s Wort, shark cartilage, açai Bettie’s, gingko biloba
weak evidence for most vitamins & supplements
calcium, vitamin C
may negatively interact with modern medicines
5-HTP supplements → precursor to serotonin
→ can develop serotonin syndrome - bad stomach, headaches, and can put you into a coma
→ have been poorly regulated by Health Canada, but new regulations are coming
manipulative methods (chiropractors)
manipulate the spine to treat pain
some argue that their treatments work for severe illnesses and other disorders
subluxation theory
misalignment of the spine is the cause of problems in the nervous and immune system
no more effective than exercise, relaxation, or physical therapy
mind-body medicine
biofeedback
provides immediate feedback for internal sensations, such as pulse or body temperature → can do it on purpose (train your body)
no better than relaxation
meditation
heightens creativity, empathy, self-esteem
decreases anxiety and depression
increases blood flow to the brain and immune functioning
better than placebo treatments
relaxation induced anxiety - being scared of the feeling of their body relaxing
energy medicines
based on mapping our energy field and managing disruptions
acupuncture
needles relieve blockages of qi (energy/life force) → “chee”
helps relieve nausea after surgery
helps treat pain
no scientific support for qi
homeopathy → whole medical system
consuming an extremely diluted dose of a harmful substance is believed to help you avoid or alleviate illness
Rhus Tox → poison ivy supposed to treat arthritis, sprains, flu
Ignatia → treat anxiety, grief, depression (used to be a very popular rat poison)
not effective
Placebo and CAMs:
placebo effect is often as effective as CAMs
sham acupuncture treats back pain and migraines as well as true acupuncture
pain is very responsive to placebo, which may be why CAMs are so popular/effective
Reasons why people believe CAMs are effective:
The placebo effect
Conventional medicine
Natural changes
Misdiagnosis/non-severe issues
Believed to have “no side-effects”
social psychology - the scientific study of how people influence other’s behaviour, beliefs, and attitudes
primary mode of investigation is experiment
applies to everyone
bias → people say they are not influenced (systematic error in thinking)
Research Methods:
experimental research
watching more violent television is associated with higher aggression in children
can develop hypothesis
create an experiment to study this
isolate the cause
variables
independent → manipulated
→ watching violent television
dependent → measured/assessed
→ aggression (observe responses)
Social Nature of Humans:
need to belong - fundamental human motivation to form and maintain an significant interpersonal relationships
need to feel connected to people
satisfy this need through social media
evolutionary purpose
advantageous to get along with other people
need help with something
social comparisons - people compare themselves to others to obtain an accurate assessment of their own abilities
we also try to explain other people’s behaviours
Fundamental Attribution Error:
internal attribution - focused on something internal about the person themselves
don’t like the class, unreliable
external attribution - focused on the situation the person is in
bus was late
→ more likely to make internal attribution for other people’s behaviour
fundamental attribution error - believing that internal factors influence behaviour to a far greater extent than external factors
external attribution error for yourself
internal attribution for other people
we never talk about it when thinking about our own behaviour
situational attribution
overhearing someone saying they are traveling to their mother’s deathbed
dispositional inference
your reconsider your assumption about rudeness
ultimate attribution error - assumption that behaviour among individual members of a group are due to their internal dispositions
particularly damage when it occurs to minority/stereotyped groups
Stereotypes:
positive or negative beliefs (schemas) about most individuals in a group
might be correct/accurate
can be over-applied
massive over generalizations
illusory correlation - the tendency to overestimate the link between variables that are loosely or not at all correlated
Prejudice:
an attitude (usually negative) toward members of a group based on their membership in that group
in-group bias - favouring people within our group over others
see more diversity
out-group homogeneity - all members of the other group are the same
we see people in a group are all the same (posses the same characteristics)
Developing Prejudice:
scapegoat hypothesis - blaming those beneath us for our misfortunes
after COVID, there was more hate towards Asian individuals
scapegoating them for the pandemic
just-world hypothesis - blaming the victim
belief that things happen for a reason/the world is fair
if somebody is disadvantaged, there is a reason
conformity to social norms - want to fit in and be liked
drives a lot of people’s behaviour
“supposed” to hate a specific group because everyone else is
Hidden Prejudice:
explicit - stated/conscious beliefs
implicit - unstated/unconscious beliefs
thought of as what is important today
subtle form of prejudice
Discrimination:
act of treating the out-group differently
Overcoming Prejudice:
stereotype activation - cultural stereotypes may come to mind automatically
will come to everyone’s mind automatically but might not be applied
stereotype application - expression of stereotypes is controlled
contact hypothesis
increase our contact with people who are different than us
need collaborative group work
Attitudes
favourable or unfavourable evaluative reaction toward something or someone
self-esteem → attitude towards ourselves
political → conservative, liberal
our attitudes aren’t the best predictor of what we do
Ex. survey of 3600 Edmonton drivers
→ 95% believe that running a red light is unacceptable
→ 24% admitted to running a red light within the past month
situational occurrence → other factors that influence our behaviour
when do attitudes predict behaviour?
easily accessed attitudes
we think about it a lot
had a negative experience
firmly held
involvement → politics
cognitive dissonance - unpleasant mental anxiety due to conflicting thoughts or behaviours
to reduce anxiety, you must change your thoughts or behaviours
coming up with a rational reason why
Ex. Cheating on a test
→ cognition A - “I’m an honest person”
change cognition A - “I am not an honest person after all”
→ cognition B - “I cheated on my psychology exam”
change cognition B - “I didn’t really cheat, I just saw someone’s answers”
Boring Study Experiment:
boring experiment, but you are asked to help recruit the next participant
offered either $1 or $20 as compensation
how do you justify the behaviour
helping the researcher
$1 doesn’t feel as justified
dissonance → not good reason to lie, so have to change your mind
$20 is sufficient justification
no dissonance
→ independent variable = whether to participant is given $1 or $20
→ dependent variable = the ratings of how boring the tasks are
Alternatives to Cognitive Dissonance:
self-perception theory - our actions give us clues to our attitudes
I eat a grilled cheese, so I must like cheese
using your behaviour to infer your attitude
impression management theory - change our behaviours to appear consistent
how do I make myself look consistent to other people
might lie about our attitudes to appear consistent
we don’t have to change our attitudes, we just have to say we did
Persuasion:
efforts to change attitudes through various kinds of messages
central route (system 2)
analytical
→ list pros and cons
→ do research
high effort
argument strength is key
→ systematic
have to be highly motivated to come up with a decision
have to have the ability to think deeply about a particular issue
strong and stable attitudes
peripheral route (system 1)
not analytical
low effort
incidental cues are key
everything outside of the fact that can bias or sway our decision
→ how pretty something is, the colours etc
unstable and weak attitudes
→ change from time to time
→ not enduring
attitudes can greater influence decisions
increasing persuasion
attractiveness/famous spokesperson
celebrities
“experts”
dentists
doctors
vivid testimonials
immerse audience → videos/images of people in need
“natural goodness”
emphasizing things that are natural/organic
emphasizing scarcity
things are running out/losing opportunity to buy something
limited supply/limited time offer
people with similar features
make us feel similar to them
somebody like us
name-letter effect
we like ourselves and things that are associated with ourselves
features of our name
implicit egotism
more drawn to things that are similar to ourselves
persuasion techniques
foot in the door
make a small request first, then follow up with a bigger request
increasing request
door in the face
ask for a large favour then quickly bring it down
people say no the large favour are more likely to say yes to a smaller request
inducing guilt
can backfire if initial request is too big
lowball
start with a very low price, then bring in the add-ons
agree to something small then mention the much needed add-ons
base-model car with nothing else
“but you are free”
ask someone to do something for you while informing them they can refuse
gets others to agree based on the illusion of free choice
double the odds of the person complying because they feel like they have a choice
Conformity:
the tendency for people to alter their behaviour due to group pressure
public compliance - outwardly going with a norm, but privately don’t agree with it
dressing up for a Halloween costume
private acceptance - acting with accordance to what the group is doing and agreeing with the idea
using the proper place to study at school
Solomon Asch’s Conformity Study:
you and 7 other “participants” (confederates)
others hired by researcher to say certain things and act a certain way
which of line A, B, or C match the first line
what would you do it the other participants all said “B”
researchers found 75% of participants conformed in the study at least once
→ we will conform to social pressure
increasing conformity
unanimity
the group being unanimous
it takes one person to give an alternate response decreases conformity
differences from the majority
you feel okay saying a different answer if the group is small ( > 5) → 5 is the magic number
size of majority
the larger the group, the more likely chance for group conformity
having to answer publicly
more likely to conform
Conformity and the Brain:
activates our amygdala
→ other influences
self-esteem
more likely to conform if you have low self-esteem
individual vs collectivist cultures
collectivists cultures have more conformity
care more about what the group think
Deindividuation:
the tendency for people, upon being striped of their usual identity, to engage in behaviours that they would almost never engage in
anonymity
feel more anonymous
can’t be personally identified
lack of responsibility
everyone is doing something (getting in a fight)
Zimbardo’s Stanford Prison Experiment:
24 male students randomly assigned to be guards or prisoners
guards began treating prisoners harshly
prisoners tried to rebel, guards acted worse
study ended on day 6, 8 days early
could be result of demand characteristic
→ social roles matter
Obedience:
adherence to instructions from authority figures
conformity to following social norms/peers
Milgram’s Study of Obedience:
participant is the “teacher”
wrong answer receives shocks, increasing in voltage
“student” is confederate, acting as though shocks are working
urged to continue after wanting to stop administering shocks
62% completed the test, went to 450 volts
was thought only 0.1% of people would complete the study
→ we tend to obey authority figures
Variations:
more “psychological distance” between experimenter and teacher decreased compliance
less “psychological distance” between teacher and learner decreased compliance
sitting side by side → less likely to obey
other variation
authority figures needs to be seen as official/have power
school was associated with Yale
more likely to comply
teacher told somebody else to shock to the learner
more likely to comply because they aren’t the ones shocking the learner
Groupthink:
emphasis on group unanimity at the expense of critical thinking
Ex. Titanic, Research Ethics Board protocols
maintaining group cohesion is more important
Group Polarization:
the tendency for group discussions to push dominant ideas to be held more strongly
cults
gradual indoctrination
group discussion can strengthen feelings about a decision
reduce group polarization by avoiding conformation bias
Social Loafing:
slacking off in groups, when individual efforts are unclear
Ex. clapping and cheering in groups, tug-of-war
everyone working towards the same goal and not being able to tell the amount of effort each person put in
reduce loafing when a task is challenging, appealing, or people feel motivated to do something
less social loafing when people think they are the smartest in a group
if they get to choose their own groups/in groups with their friends
Bystander Non-Intervention Effect:
Kitty Genoese - 1964
stabbed numerous times in the early morning outside her apartment
numerous people heard her screams, but no one called for help
bystander non-intervention effect - tendency for individuals to assume that others will act
pluralistic ignorance - error of assuming no one in the group perceive things as we do
diffusion of responsibility - people feel less responsible when there are more witnesses near by
enlightenment effect - learning about psychological research can change real-world behaviour for the better
Social Interactions:
prosocial
helping behaviour
help only if rewards outweigh costs
help regardless of rewards and costs
altruism - type of helping behaviour where people help others for unselfish reasons
helping regardless of reward/no benefit for them
helping behaviour
situational influences
→ number of bystanders
→ no escape — more likely to engage if they can’t escape the situation
→ being in a good mood — happy people are more likely to help others
→ observing positive role models — if we are encouraged to be empathetic, we are more likely to do so
→ no time constraints (Good Samaritan study) — feeling rush, you are a lot less likely to help
→ victim characteristics — much more likely to help an older person with a cane/someone who looks like us
individual differences
→ less concern with social approval — if people are less, they are going to be more helpful
→ more extroverted — more likely to help than an introverted person
→ training/expertise — trained medical workers are more likely to help than
gender differences
→ men more likely to help is risky situations
→ women more likely to volunteer (safer situation)
asocial
anti-social
Aggression:
aggression - any behaviour intended to cause physical or psychological pain
physical harm, verbal harm, decision to harm someone
predicting aggression
situational influences
interpersonal provocation → whether or not we are provoked
frustration → more likely to behave aggressively when frustrated
media influences → watching violent media increases odds of engaging in violence (observational learning) — relatively short term
aggressive cues → external cues associated with violence can prime more aggressive responses (being a presence of some sort of violent cue like a knife) — weapons effect - the mere presence of weapons increases aggression
arousal → autonomic system is hyped up, we might interpret this arousal as anger
alcohol/drugs → decreases inhibition to act violently/lower self-awareness
temperature → being warm increases irritability/bodily discomfort/levels of arousal
individual differences
high levels of negative affect → anxiety, depression, mistrust
impulsivity → very impulsive/can’t withhold feelings of anger
less prevalent among Asian cultures (collectivist cultures)
culture of honour in Southern USA → insult wife, try to take land = aggressive reaction
gender differences
men tend to be more physically aggressive
women display more relational aggressive
personality - people’s typical ways of thinking, feeling, and behaving that influence how they live
relatively consistent
characteristics that remain stable across situations that then we often use to predict how people are going to act/react in new or certain situations
we tend to categorize people to help us understand others (sometimes to even predict behaviour)
categorize in terms of extroversion/introversion and other similar ways
Two Major Ways of Studying Personality:
nomothetic - researchers find general rules that govern all individuals
what is true for everyone; making generalities about people, personality, or tendencies
idiographic - researchers find unique combinations of characteristics and experiences within individuals
looking at one individual, we may be able to figure out their personality qualities and how they might have predicted their success and their behaviour
can be difficult to falsify post hoc, but studying one person via idiographic research can be a good starting point for going into nomothetic approaches to compare the traits of one person to others
Behavioural Genetics Research:
→ three broad influences on our personalities
genetic factors - heritability is not super accurate in identifying personality, but a large part of our personality comes from genetic factors
approx 50% of our personality comes from genetic factors
shared environmental factors - experiences in one family/house/community that makes individuals more alike
diet, routines, access to things such as technology, manners/mannerisms
nonshared environmental factors - specific for each individual
putting one sibling in soccer and the other in martial arts, different friends, different teachers
have a larger influence on personality that shared environmental factors
a larger portion of our personality comes from non shared environmental factors
→ things that differentiate individual members from the rest of their family
→ some things that look shared may not truly be shared
parenting styles with multiple children
Twin + Adoption Studies:
twins reared together - comparing identical twins (100% same genetic makeup) to fraternal twins (50% same genetic makeup → same as siblings)
identical twins are more alike in personality traits than fraternal twins
suggests the role of genetics
adoption studies - compares an adopted child’s personality to their biological parents to their adopted parents
adopted children tend to be more like their biological parents
suggests greater influence of genetics
identical twins reared apart - comparing identical twins that were raised apart
about similar as regular kids being reared together → the shared environment has little difference/impact on personality
the nonshared environmental factors have greater impacts than the shared ones but still less than genetics
Psychoanalytical Theory:
Sigmund Freud - used his hypothesis and free association to access the unconscious mind, studied neurosis, and came up with a base of personality that is true for most/all people
→ father of psychoanalytic theory
→ treated many patients with hysteria
assumptions
psychic determinism - all our actions are due to inner forces/conflicts
dreams, accidental slips of the tongue, repressed/suppressed emotions or thoughts
our dreams our symbolic messages for hidden, unconscious desires
symbolic meaning - our actions represent our inner forces and conflicts
Freud studied this via dream content → thought that what we dream about is a reflection of our unconscious desires
unconscious motivation - the reason for our actions are outside our awareness
view human personality that we have little control over what we do
thought we had to engage in psychoanalysis to bring the unconscious out and make it conscious to find out how we can be motivated
Structures of Personality:
id - primitive instincts
libido - sex drive and urges
thanatos - aggression and death → impulses — immediate gratification
superego - sense of morality
conscience → moral compass, holds impossible standard of ideals and values, deciding right from wrong
ego - the decision maker
conscious awareness and wishes → the rational part of our brain that mediates between the id and superego — sense of reality that controls and directs the other two in ways that are acceptable and “right”
Example:
→ id in a hungry state would want to grab a snack and eat in the grocery store without paying for it
→ superego says “you can eat anything now, you have to buy it first”
→ ego makes the decision to buy the snack then eat or eat it then buy it (find a compromising decision)
Defense Mechanisms:
→ work to keep us psychologically healthy, unless we begin to rely on one or two of the mechanisms exclusively
repression - motivated forgetting of threatening memories or impulses
blocking out traumatic experiences
denial - motivated forgetting of current experiences
denying something that is currently happening to reduce anxiety in the moment
regression - returning to a psychologically younger state
regress to a lower level of maturity, returning to things that gave you comfort as a child or infant
reaction-formation - doing the opposite of what triggers the anxiety
similar to overcompensating to not expose insecurities or weakness
ex. unwanted pregnancy leads to overprotective parenting style
projection - attributing your feelings onto others
ex someone not liking someone and describing them as mean
though their actual actions many not display these negative feelings because they’ve been projected onto the person
displacement - transferring your feelings onto a safer object
ex. coming home from work and punching a wall
rationalization - explaining away behaviour
excuses for why we act the way we act
external attributions → blaming outcomes of situational factors
intellectualization - explaining emotions with higher concept ideas
making anxiety causing things seem more complex
ex. calling terminal or chronic rather than fatal because it may sound more intellectual
sublimation - changing negative impulse into a socially acceptable goal
ex. engaging in exercise after a stressful day to get rid of pent-up energy and frustration
Stages of Psychosexual Development:
→ Freud believed that development occurred in 5 erotic stages
oral stage (brith - 18 months)
babies navigating the world by putting things in their mouths
pleasure from food, sucking, chewing
individuals in this stage can develop oral fixation
the adult version of this stage is being dependent upon others for reassurance
adults chewing nails, smokings, rubbing lips
anal stage (18 months - 3 years)
toilet training and sense of control over self and environment
anal fixation - either excessive orderliness or laziness
“anal” in reference to intensely orderly people comes from this term and its fixations
phallic stage (3 - 6 years)
sexual desires for the opposite sex parent and urges to harm or be more like the same sex parent develop
oedipus complex - urge to harm father and/or have sex with mother
electra complex - urge to kill mother and have sex with father
latency stage (6 - 12 years)
sexual impulses are held in the unconscious
mostly disproved due to the recent research on sexual development between 6 and 12 years old
genital stage (12+ years)
sexual impulses renew with puberty
romantic relationships develop
→ Freud argued that what happened in the first 5 years of life contribute largely to our personality later in life
Scientific Examination:
unfalsifiable
failed predictions
poor support for the unconscious
unrepresentative and small samples
poor support for the role of shared environmental influence
Non-Freudian Theories:
core assumptions
emphasis on the unconscious and early childhood experiences
less emphasis on sexaulity
more optimistic about human nature
Alfred Adler
striving for superiority
striving to dominate others, be better than others, achieving the goals you want to achieve
children who are pampered or neglected may develop inferiority complex
low self-esteem
parenting styles impacts inferiority complex
children become more dependent on people
Carl Jung
collective conscious
suggest all of us have a personal unconscious (traumas) and collective unconscious (shared historical members, desires, wishes, that are passed down from our ancestors)
fear of snake → passed down from ancestors
accounts for similarities we see in myths about other cultures
archetypes
symbol of a mother → loving, caring
hero
circle → unity, wholeness
Karen Hornet
first major feminist theories that had an issue with Freud’s theory
founder of feminist psychology
argued against penis envy and oedipus complex
argued it had to do with the social/gender norms
otherwise, did not stray from Freud
Scientific Examination:
unfalsifiable
Humanistic Theory:
core assumptions
rejects determinism for free will
believe people want to self-actualize
trying to develop our innate potential to its fullest extent
Carl Rogers
revolutionized psycho therapy
people are inherently positive
conditions of worth → expectations we place ourselves regarding appropriate vs inappropriate behaviour
rewarding kids who say they want to be a firefighter or a doctor vs not rewarding kids who say they want to be a stay at home parent
differences in personality is a reflection of the condition of work that has been put on us
Abraham Maslow
focused on individuals who have “achieved” self-actualization
believed only 1% if adults reach this
common features → creative, spontaneous, accepting, self-confident
Scientific Examination:
human nature is no entirely positive
when people receive therapy to match their current self-identities with “true identities”, symptoms do not necessarily improve
selection bias for Maslow’s findings
difficult to falsify the drive for self-actualization
Behavioural Theory:
core assumptions
behavioural determinism - your past learning experiences drive your behaviour
our behaviour is governed by what we have been rewarded for or punished in the past
there is no such thing as free will
the environment drives the “unconscious”
can be aware of the influence it has
Scientific Examination:
if thoughts were unnecessary, why did humans evolve to be able to think?
Social Learning:
core assumptions
reciprocal determinism - how personality, cognitive, behaviour, and the environment include each other
all inclusive theory
observational learning - learn by watching other people
Scientific Examination:
social modeling relies on the influence on the shared environment
Personality Traits:
personality traits - relatively enduring patterns of thoughts, feelings, and behaviours that make people different from one another
implements our behaviours across situations
different ways to describe people’s personality traits
aggressive
impulsive
curious
social
Trait Models:
focused on describing the structure of personality, instead of the cause
trait theorists interested in what behaviours and attitudes are consistent across situations
Gordon Allport → first trait theorist
→ if we have particular traits, we must be able to describe them
→ noticed many words are synonyms to each other
→ personality traits with the most synonyms might be the most important when considering different models of personality
Factor Analysis:
Raymond Cattell
factor analysis - statistical means of examining which things go together
higher correlation between items indicate the items are more related to one another
how researchers developed the Big 5 Model
Big Five Model of Personality:
suggests that all of us possess each of the traits from one degree to another
neuroticism - emotionally unstable
anxious
tense
irritabile
lack self-confidence
extraversion - being outgoing
sociable
assertive
energetic
conscientiousness - organized and reliable
efficient
orderly
thorough
self-disciplined
higher GPAs
agreeableness - highly agreeable
kind
warm
very trusting of others
forgiving
altruistic
compliant
modest
openness to experience
imaginative
curious
artistic
unconventional values
one of the most controversial traits in the Big 5
→ people can vary along any of these traits
→ traits can be describe with different amounts of each trait
→ just because two people match in one trait doesn’t mean they will match in other traits
→ each trait is uncorrelated with one another
good at predicting our behaviours
cultural influences
lots of cross-cultural support
openness to experience may not be cross cultural
“group harmony” vs “honesty/humility”
individualism vs collectivism
The Big Three:
neuroticism
extraversion
impulse control - how much you can resist a desire to engage in something
The Big Two:
extraversion/dominance
agreeableness/love
→ interpersonal traits - interactions between people involving exchanges (traits that can’t be expressed when you are alone on an island)
Can Traits Change:
until age 30, some changes are common
openness to experiences, neuroticism, and extroversion decrease from late teens to early 30s
conscientiousness and agreeableness tend to increase
suggests that as we mature and gain more social roles, we end up adopting personality that is more consistent with those roles
after age 30, there is very little personality change
psychotherapy can prolong personality changes
Scientifically Examined
behavioural inconsistency (Walter Mischel)
low correlations between similar behaviours in different environments
low correlations between traits and specific behaviour
→ response to Mischel
personality traits predict aggregated behaviours
correlation of 0.4 is not that small
both personality and situations influence each other
your consciousness cannot predict whether you show up to class → cannot predict situations
Defining Mental Disorders:
statistical rarity - the idea that to call something a mental disorder, it should be relatively rare
subjective distress - idea that the person should show up talking about the symptoms they are experiencing are overwhelming
stress them out
cannot work
* one of the most important
impairment - there is something in your life you cannot do because of your symptoms
* one of the most important
societal/cultural disapproval - are the behaviours a person is engaging in acceptable?
griefing looks different for different cultures → wearing black/mourning vs minimal reaction/change to every day life
biological dysfunction - for some disorders, there are much more prominent roles of biological factors
least important
→ need a combination of these to determine if someone has a mental disorder
History of Mental Disorders:
demonic model - mental disorders are due to evil spirits
demons, exorcisms, witches, moon and stars
trephining - puncture a hole in the skull to let the evil demons out of the skull
decreasing the inter-cranial pressure might have helped people who needed the pressure released (getting hit in the head)
medical model - mental disorders are due to physical health issues
asylums - prison for people with mental disorders
a place to keep people with mental disorders
blood-letting - opening up a vain and letting some of the blood out
people who are acting this way have too much blood (sometimes up to 40% of a persons blood)
moral treatment/therapy - changing how they treat people
removing all the restraints
doctors actually talk to the clients → treating them like human beings
→ very successful, but lead to its own downfall
modern era
deinstitutionalization movement
community-based resources
Diagnosing:
diagnosing - the act of giving someone a label/term for their symptoms
why do we diagnose
to improve communication between professionals and disciplines
to give the client a term for what they are experiencing
to choose the best treatments
to aid in research
Misconceptions about Diagnosing:
diagnosing is just putting people into “boxes”
argued that psychologists believe that all people with a diagnosis are the same
diagnoses are unreliable
argued that no two psychologists ever agree on the same diagnosis
diagnoses are invalid
argued that diagnosing doesn’t tell us anything useful
diagnoses distinguish between groups
labels can predict what family members are dealing with
diagnosis can predict what is going to happen with a person’s symptoms over time
diagnosis predicts how they are going to respond to certain treatments
diagnoses stigmatize
argued that the labels are self-fulfilling prophecies, and influence how others treat them
Rosehan’s pseudo patient study (1973) - 8 people when to 12 different psychiatric hospitals reporting they are all hearing “empty” “hollow” and “thud” → every single person got admitted to the hospital and almost all got diagnosed with schizophrenia
DSM-5-TR:
diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders
diagnostic criteria
set of symptoms, such that a client must have X number of possible symptoms, within Y amount of time
major depression → have to have 5 of the 9 symptoms within a 2 week period
symptoms must not be due to medical conditions or substances
Ex. tumour on your thyroid gland, you don’t have depression
published by American Psychiatric Association
psychiatrist get the final say
other features
prevalence rate → percentage of the population that has/had the disorder
stats
atheoretical bio psychological approach → points our general information about all the disorders
how development and culture may affect disorders → you have to take a person’s culture into account — the way they’re acting may be normal to them and not to us
criticisms
comorbidity between disorder - when people have more than one disorder
more natural than a problem
categorical approach vs dimensional approach
dimensional - never a clear line in the say in whether you have a disorder or not
categorical - there is a specific cut off as to if you have the disorder or not → if you have 4 of the symptoms vs 5 of the symptoms
Anxiety-Related Disorders:
→ typical onset is from teenage years to early adulthood
somatic disorders (which feature anxiety) → not technically anxiety disorders
somatic symptom disorder - intense anxiety regarding physical symptoms
Ex. having cluster headaches and believing you have a brain tumour
illness anxiety disorder - intense anxiety regarding physical symptoms that cannot be found by medical professionals
Ex. noticing a spot on your arm, scratch and pick at it → believe they have skin cancer (no you have dry skin)
generalized anxiety disorder - excessive and uncontrollable worry
worries about numerous minor topics
experiences muscle tension, irritability, difficulties sleeping, and difficulties with concentration
not the overarching category of anxiety
depression usually comes first (18-20 years), then GAD (30 years)
panic disorder - repeated, unexpected panic attacks that cause the individual to change their behaviour or that the in individual persistently worries about
change their life to stop them
worry about how you live your life with panic attacks
20-25% of university student experience at least one panic attack in the past year
panic attack - heart racing, tingling in your fingers, sweating
can feel like a heart attack
agoraphobia - avoidance of, or intense distress in, locations where escape may be difficult or embarrassing, or help would be unavailable, if panic attack-like symptoms began
public transit
open space
enclosed places
outside of the home alone
lines or crowds
→ don’t need to be diagnosed with panic disorder to be diagnosed with agoraphobia
social anxiety disorder - afraid of the evaluation of others and believe they lack the same social skills as other people
avoid social situations or endure them with intense distress
fear of judgement and other people’s opinions
one of the most common disorders
specific phobias - significant and recurrent fear or anxiety of specific objects or situations
animals, insects, storms, water, elevators, darkness, clowns, etc
having these fears are okay
not a disorder → does not impair day-to-day life
can’t look at somebody’s behaviour and diagnosis them
post-traumatic stress disorder - exposure to actual or threatened death, serious injury, or sexual violence (trauma/stress related disorder category)
how to get PTSD
experience it
witness it
hear out it from close friends or family
repeatedly exposed to traumatic events
intense distress when reminded about event
attempts to avoid or suppress memories
anhedonia - loss of pleasure → things don’t feel good anymore
Ex. hanging out with your friends
exaggerated startle response
obsessive-compulsive disorder
obsessions - recurrent & persistent thoughts, images, or urges that are considered intrusive & unwanted
causes you to get very anxious
compulsions - repetitive behaviour or mental acts that are done in response to to an obsession, but are unable to realistically prevent distress or feared future event
Psychological Factors in Anxiety-Related Disorders:
classical conditioning - neutral stimulus becomes a conditioned stimulus, which causes fear and anxiety
Ex. Little Albert and the white rat, Pavlov’s dogs
operant conditioning - negative reinforcement of avoidance/escape response
negative reinforcement - keep doing the certain behaviour to get rid of a bad behaviour
observational learning - learning from watching others
Ex. picking up fears from parents → dad is scared of blood, brother is now scared of blood
information/misinformation - being told something, which encourages anxious behaviours
being told about a plane crash in Toronto, but you’re flying to Calgary
catastrophizing - assuming the worst outcome will occur
blowing things out of proportion
anxiety sensitivity - awareness of internal sensations and fear of fear
similar to a personality trait (on the spectrum)
intolerance of uncertainty - fear of the unknown future
need to know what will happen
metacognitions - beliefs and worries about our own thoughts and patterns
thinking about your thinking
Biological Factors in Anxiety-Related Disorders:
twin studies show small to moderate genetic contributions for all anxiety disorders
low levels of serotonin and GABA (general inhibitor neurotransmitter)
evolutionary preparedness learning
neuroticism is elevated in most anxiety disorders, especially GAD (generalized anxiety disorder)
high in worry and rumination
Mood Disorders:
→ most commonly associated with feeling down (depression), but also with excessively elevated/expansive mood (mania)
major depressive disorder - significantly depressed mood or anhedonia
significant change in weight/appetite, insomnia or hypersomnia, worthlessness, thoughts of suicide
most often it features recurrent episodes
Psychological Factors in Major Depression:
life events model - stressful life events trigger depression
loss of a significant relationship
behavioural model - lack of positive reinforcement
continued withdrawal and deterioration in social skills
interpersonal model - depressed individuals seek excessive reassurance and talk pessimistically, which drives away others
Coyne (1976) - talking to depressed people study
reported that the students did not want to talk to the depressed person again vs the other two groups
learned helplessness model (Seligmen) - if you find yourself in a situation where you can’t escape from a bad thing, you give up trying to change things. Even when the situation changes, you continue to not try and change it
dog is blocked from escaping blocks
taken into a new room, where escape is possible
does not learn to escape shocks
in humans? → people in abusive relationships
cognitive model (Beck)
cognitive triad - people with depression have negative views of 1) themselves, 2) the future, and 3) the world
negative schemas/cognitive distortions - filter into the negative, ignoring the positive
depressive realism - argument that people with depression aren’t negative about themselves, they just see the world as it truly is
people who are not depressed are more optimistic than they should be
Biological Factors in Major Depression:
genetic contribution, but role of specific genes is still debated
serotonin, norepinephrine, and dopamine all involved
neuroticism especially high
biological factors affect women more than men
Bipolar Disorders:
mani/hypomania - significantly elevated, expansive, or irritable mood (personality gets turned way up)
hypomania - less severe and doesn’t last as long
grandiosity (think highly of themselves), increased goal directed activity, decreased need for sleep, engagement is risky activities
causes a lot of stress on friends and family
Ex. gambling away life savings
bipolar I disorder - have experienced a manic episode
bipolar II disorder - have experienced a hypomania episode, as well as major depression
Factors in Bipolar Disorders:
biological factors
heritability may be as high as 85%
serotonin and dopamine likely involved
antidepressant induced mania
psychological factors
stressful life events
sleep disruptions
Suicide:
3rd leading cause of death in children, adolescents, and young adults
also high in Indigenous populations and the elderly
women attempt more, but more men die by suicide
predictors of attempting suicide (in order from best - worst)
current planning/ideation
previous attempts
hopelessness
depression
comorbid substance abuse or other mental disorders
recent major life stressor
Schizophrenia:
positive symptoms (added to their experience of reality)
delusions - strongly held irrational beliefs
persecutory (FBI is tracking you boss is trying to screw you over), grandiose (believing you are the born-again Jesus, you can make a car that runs on water with no engineering experience), erotomaniac (believing somebody is in love with you), somatic (something is wrong with your body that isn’t real)
hallucinations - auditory or visual sensory stimuli that are not real
auditory is the most common
disorganized symptoms
disorganized speech - loose associations between ideas
disorganized behaviour - behaviour that does not fit context
catatonia - waxy flexibility (freezing for a period of time), echolalia (talking parrot), purposeless activity (pacing)
negative symptoms (something is taken away)
apathy - no motivation, even for personal hygiene
flat affect - emotional responses
asociality - no interest in others
alogia - very limited speech
anhedonia - loss of pleasure in anything
Factors in Schizophrenia:
schizophrenogenic mothers - cold, overprotective, rejecting mothers broke the child’s brain
Freud idea
no evidence (probably doesn’t play a role)
expressed emotion (does play a role)
family is high in criticism, hostility, an over-involvement
has both genetic contributions, and may emerge as a result of the stress and associated with diagnosis
differs between cultures
Black Americans → lack of warmth plays more of role than high criticism
→ low expressed emotion might be worse
→ high expressed emotion is the norm
brain abnormalities
not diagnostic
not everybody with schizophrenia has brain abnormalities
enlarged ventricles
bring good stuff in, flush bad stuff out
don’t know why this happens
hypofrontality
frontal lobe doesn’t seem to be firing as much (less activity)
issues with planning/thinking things through, language, lack of connection with people
50% of people with schizophrenia show this
marijuana use
if you have a genetic risk of developing schizophrenia and between the age of 10-30, regularly weed with really high THC increases your odds of developing schizophrenia
weed doesn’t cause schizophrenia
neurotransmitters
organically dopamine hypothesis (chemical imbalance theory of schizophrenia)
people with schizophrenia have too much dopamine in their brain
the drugs that seem to work for schizophrenia but cause people to develop something that looks like Parkinson’s (low dopamine), so the drugs must be pushing down the dopamine in your brain
excess stimulation of some dopamine receptors, but lack of stimulation at others
genetics
family, twin, and adoption studies show significant genetic influences
up to 80% genetic
never entirely genetic → depends on what happens in your life
diathesis-stress model (applies to every disorder)
diathesis (risk factors/predisposition) + stressor = symptoms
do you have the genetics + does some major life event happen = disorders starts (old way of thinking about it)
diathesis is not just genetics → did you grow up in poverty, were you assaulted by your parents
stressors can be daily hassles
once the symptoms start, those symptoms are also stressors
Personality Disorders:
→ does not want to diagnosis until around 17-18, but can see elements of it earlier
common characteristics
persistent ways of behaving across situations
causes enduring emotional distress/impairment
exception that with these disorders, some people do not acknowledge the impairment (claims it is just who they are)
controversies
distress and impairment may not be apparent to the individual
lower reliability, questionable validity
lots of psychologist do not know how to diagnose correctly
some of the personality disorders may not be real disorders
high comorbidity rates
high degree of overlap between disorders
borderline personality disorder:
→ line between neurosis and psychosis
preoccupied with fears of abandonment
when they are in relationships, they are always looking for ways the person is going to leave them → switch to being the one who threatens to leave first
instability in mood, identity, and relationships
get angry, sad, anxious out of no where
highly impulsive
engaging in substance abuse, purging
chronic feelings of emptiness
when something bad happens, they can start spiraling down
repeated suicide attempts or self-harm behaviours
only diagnosed in women
don’t look for it in men
Proposed Explanation:
psychoanalytic concept of “splitting”
don’t realize they are acting this way
difficulties regulating emotions
neuroticism
childhood sexual abuse
psychopathic personality
→ not a disorder
→ anti-personality is the disorder
subset of antisocial personality disorder
do not follow society’s rules
lack empathy
highly manipulative
charming and engaging
frequently commit crimes
no connection to intelligence and being a psychopath
Proposed Explanation:
under arousal hypothesis
baseline is under aroused because they want to be up where everybody else it
fearlessness hypothesis
people who are psychopaths don’t learn fear cues or have a sense of danger
genetic contribution
childhood physical abuse
little boys experience more physical abuse
only men are diagnosed with anti-social disorder
dissociative disorders
depersonalization/derealization disorder
multiple episodes of depersonalization or derealization or both
dissociative amnesia
memory loss following a stressful/traumatic experience
dissociative fatigue
dissociative amnesia, combined with feeling the area
dissociative identity disorder
two or more personality states
“host” and “alters”
different respiration rates, brain waves activity, eyesight, handedness, voice patterns, etc
amnesia between alters has not been supported
can pretend your way through it (fake it)
Explanations For Dissociative Disorder:
post-traumatic model
individual compartmentalizes their identity in response to childhood abuse
abuse histories have not aways been supported, and abuse is not specific to DID
sociocognitive model (better model)
beliefs of, techniques used by, therapists help to create the “alters“
significant empirical support
clients rarely report alters before beginning therapy
techniques like hypnosis can implant false memories
therapists often encourage clients to name the alters
number of alters often increases during therapy
dissociation is associated with daydreaming/fantasizing
Childhood Disorders:
autism spectrum disorder
severe deficits in language, social bonding, and imagination, and intelligence
repetitive and restrictive behaviours
Proposed Explanation
genetics, parental age at conception
MMR vaccine (illusory correlation)
a doesn’t necessarily cause b
improved/more liberal diagnostic criteria
attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder
restless, emotional outbursts as preschoolers
refuse to stay seated, do not follow directions, can’t stay focused, and have temper tantrums
Proposed Explanation
genetic contribution
decreased brain volume and frontal lobe activation
over diagnosed (?)
What is, and Who Provides, Psychotherapy:
a psychological intervention designed to help people resolve emotional, behavioural, and interpersonal problems, and improve their quality of life
primary clinical psychiatrist, counselling psychologist, social workers, and psychiatric nurses
paraprofessionals
less formal training
Psychoanalysis & Pyschodynamic Therapies
core features
cause of abnormal behaviours
intra-psychic conflicts & adverse childhood events
analyze
distressing thoughts, feelings, wishes, dreams, or fantasies that the client is avoiding
therapeutic relationship
treatment
increase client insight through therapist’s interpretations
psychoanalysis techniques
free association
client says whatever comes to mind
interpretation
telling the client what the underlying motivations may be
hypnosis & dream analysis
all dreams were driven by sex and aggression
resistance
trying to avoid experiencing more distressing thoughts
transference
projection of intense feelings onto the therapist
→ counter transference - how a therapist acts towards a client
working through
challenging of ineffective coping strategies and resistance
psychodynamic therapy
interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT)
therapist is a participant observer
strengthens social skills, improve current relationships, and helps client adjust to relationship losses and life transitions
developed to treat depression
Scientific Examination:
is insight necessary → no
is dream analysis falsifiable → no
is repression real → no
lack of treatment outcome research with large and representative samples
psychoanalysis is no more effective than support groups
IPT is effective in selective disorder
Humanistic Therapies:
core features
cause of abnormal behaviour
conditions of worth and lack of self-actualization
analyze
current emotions and relationships
disconnect between current-self and ideal-self
treatment
increase insight through empathy and reflection
Person-Centred Therapy Techniques:
non-directive
given full control of the session and therapy to the client
therapists is authentic and genuine
must tell the client his/her reaction to what the client is saying
unconditional positive regard
non-judgemental of the client’s life and their decisions
empathetic understanding with reflection → how you show the unconditional positive regard
must try to fully understand the client’s experience and communicate it back to them
Scientific Examination:
self-actualization is difficult to falsify
how important is the therapeutic relationship
necessary, but not sufficient
treatment may enhance relationship
may be no more effective than placebo treatments
some studies have shown strong effects
Behaviour Therapy (BT):
core features
cause of abnormal behaviours
learning history and current behaviours
analyze
present thoughts, emotions, and behaviours
environmental contingencies
treatment
change client’s behaviour and environmental stimuli
BT Techniques:
systematic desensitization
teach client to relax on cue
develop an exposure hierarchy
begin imaginal exposure to least-anxiety provoking stimulus while engaging in relaxation
as the client masters one level of the hierarchy, move on the next
steps of a fear/phobia
works well for anxiety
exposure therapy
same process, but the less focus on relaxation, more focus on in-vivo exposures
in-vivo → doing it in real life
Type of Exposure Therapy:
flooding with response prevention
starting at the top of the exposure hierarchy, with little relaxation training
virtual reality therapy
can create exposure scenarios that are expensive, dangerous, or impossible to create in-vivo
token economy
use of positive and/or negative reinforcement to change behaviour
reward to encourage good behaviour
aversion therapies
use of unpleasant conditioning or punishment to change behaviour
quickly become scared of doing the behaviour
Cognitive-Behavioural Therapies (CBT):
core features
cause of abnormal behaviours
dysfunctional/irrational beliefs
analyze
present thoughts, emotions, and behaviours
core beliefs
treatment
change dysfunctional thinking and behaviours
Rational Emotive Behavioural Therapy:
developed by Albert Ellis
ABCs
activating event
beliefs
consequences
challenges core beliefs
homework exercises
Cognitive Therapy:
developed by Aaron T. Beck (father of CBT)
automatic thoughts and the cognitive triad drives symptoms
challenge automatic thoughts (and core beliefs)
if you tell yourself something, then the therapist will point out that evidence but find more positive evidence → you did well on the presentation, you are not actually a bad presenter
exposure exercises and homework
what drives the change is what you do in between sessions
realistic thinking → training people to be scientists about their own thinking
works for almost every disorder
Other CBT Approaches:
acceptance and commitment therapies
accept thoughts as “just thoughts”
let the thoughts float by
be open to emotional experiences
behave in accordance with one’s values
dialectical behaviour therapy
many elements of Beck’s cognitive therapy, plus radical acceptance, mindfulness, and interpersonal therapy
developed specifically for borderline personality disorder
minimum of one year therapy
metacognitive therapies
challenge the beliefs you have about your thoughts
why are you worrying about it in the first place
eclectic approaches
many therapists take elements from many approaches, including yoga, motivational interviewing, and mindfulness
Scientific Examination:
BT/CBT
more effective than placebo treatments
generally, more effective than psychoanalytic and person-centred therapies
as effective as IPT and medications, potentially less relapse long-term
new methods are as effective as older approaches
Couples/Family and Group Therapies:
core features
cause of abnormal behaviours
group dynamics/interpersonal relationships seen as cause of individual dysfunction
analyze
group interactions
treatment
both therapists and other group members may help an individual client and provide support
Examples of Group Therapy:
Alcoholics Anonymous
“sponsored” by another member who has had years of sobriety
alcoholism is a disease and once an alcoholic, always an alcoholic
once you’re in AA, you cannot touch alcohol
must turn to a “higher power”
God
very high drop out rate
work for 30%-60% of people who stick with it
still very high rate of relapse
controlled drinking and relapse prevention
CBT approach
can learn to drink moderately, and relapse is seen as a “slip” and nothing more
setting your own goal
two beers on the weekend
Effectiveness of Psychotherapy:
the dodo bird verdict
“all psychotherapies are equally effective”
meta-analysis techniques have tested this
in some meta analyses, psychodynamic, person-centred, and CBT approaches have been equally effective
however, CBT consistently performs the best for children/teens and for anxiety disorders
other therapies have greater potential to cause harm
common factors
empathetic listening
instills hope
forms a strong therapeutic alliance
provides clear rationale for treatment
offers way to improve thinking, feeling, and behaving
necessary, but not sufficient for severe disorders
have to give patient actual techniques and strategies
why do people believe pseudoscientific treatments work
regression to the mean
symptoms would have gotten better if you stayed home for three months
spontaneous remission
sometimes symptoms just go away
placebo effect
believing therapy is going to work, they therapy is going to work
common factors
having a good therapist is going to decrease stress
self-serving bias
someone will say therapy is going well because they put a lot of money into it
inaccurate memories
overestimate symptoms at the start
Biological Therapy - Psychopharmacology:
anxiolytics drugs (anti-anxiety)
benzodiazepines (Valium, Xanax, Ativan)
increase the effects of GABA in the brain
GABA - main inhibitory transmitter in brain (calms brain down)
tend to be highly addictive
rebound anxiety
effective only in short term
antidepressants
SSRIs (Prozac, Celexa, Zoloft)
tricyclics and monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs)
effective, but takes 2-6 weeks
disproves “chemical imbalance theory”
also work for anxiety and eating disorders
mood stabilizers
lithium, anticonvulsant medications (valporate)
decrease the frequency/duration of mania
antipsychotic drugs
conventional (Thorazine, Haldol) antipsychotics
primarily treat the positive symptoms of schizophrenia
atypical (Risperdal, Seroquel, Clorazil) antipsychotics
can treat both positive and negative symptoms
fewer side effects than conventional
tardive dyskinesia
side effect that makes the person looks like they have Parkinson’s disease
→ over prescribed?
SSRIs may not be effective for children, and may increase suicide risk in adults
rates of ADHD medication have greatly increased
psychostimulants (Ritalin, Adderall)
increasing polypharmacy, particularly in the elderly
being on multiple medications → largely don’t do anything
Scientific Examination:
CBT is as effective as most medications, and often better at preventing relapse
removal of medication often prompts relapse
CBT can change brain circuitry, like medications
CBAT + medications have been shown to be more effective in some conditions
medications are strongly encouraged for some disorders and situations
Biological Theory - Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT):
used for people with depression, when other treatments have failed
shock in administered for less than 1 second
once every second day, 6-10 times
80%-90% respond well, but relapse remains high
minor memory loss, but it may persist
new forms
trans cranial magnetic stimulation, trans cranial direct current stimulation
Biological Therapy - Psychosurgery:
prefrontal lobotomies were extensively used until the 1940s and 1950s
control behaviour, and punishments, served as justification more than treatment
newer versions, such as deep brain stimulation or precise removal of brain tissues, and are much safer but rarely used, so there is little research