Chapter Nineteen: Law, Society, and the Mental Health Profession
Forensic Psychology: The branch of psychology concerned with intersections between psychological practice and research and the judicial system
Courts need to know whether defendants are responsible for the crimes they commit and capable of defending themselves in court
Criminal Commitment: A legal process by which people accused of a crime are instead judged mentally unstable and sent to a treatment facility
Not guilty by reason of Insanity: A verdict stating that defendants are not guilty of a crime because they were mentally unstable at the time of their crimes
Another form - people are judged mentally unstable at the time of their trial
Committed for treatment until they’re competent to stand trial
Criminal Commitment and Insanity During Commission of a Crime
Defense’s burden is to prove that defendants are insane
Insanity is a legal term
M’Naghten Test: A legal test that holds people to be insane at the time they committed crime if, because of a mental disorder, they didn’t know the nature of the act or didn’t know right from wrong
Irresistible Impulse Test: A legal test that hold people to be insane at the time they committed a crime if they were driven to do so by an uncontrollable “fit of passion”
Durham Test: A legal test that holds people to be insane at the time they committed a crime if their act was the result of a mental disorder
American Law Institute test: A legal test that combines aspects of the M’Naghten, irresistible impulse, and Durham tests
More than 80% of defendants who are acquitted of a crime by reason of insanity qualify for a diagnosis of schizophrenia or another form of psychosis
Concerns raised by the Insanity Defense
Legal definitions of insanity and responsibility will differ from those suggested by clinical research
Lack of professional agreement about abnormal behavior
Clinicians can never be entirely certain that their assessments of mental instability at the time of the crime are accurate
Allows criminals to escape punishment
Public dramatically overestimates the percentage of defendants who plead insanity
Only a minority of defendants fake or exaggerate their psychological symptoms
Offenders are being released earlier and earlier
Increasing effectiveness of drug therapy and other treatments
Growing reaction against extended institutionalization
More emphasis on patients’ rights
Outpatient Commitment: A way of maintaining control over offenders even after their release using community treatment, patient monitoring, and rehospitalization if necessary
Other Verdicts Available
Guilty but Mentally Ill: A verdict stating that defendants are guilty of committing a crime but are also suffering from a mental illness that should be treated during their imprisonment
Hasn’t reduced the number of not guilty by reason of insanity verdicts
Often confuses jurors
Appropriate mental health care is supposed to be available to all prisoners anyway
Guilty with Diminished Capacity: A defendant’s mental dysfunction is viewed as an extenuating circumstance that the court should take into consideration in determining the precise crime of which they are guilty
Because of mental dysfunction, the defendant couldn’t have intended to commit a particular crime
Can be found guilty of a lesser crime
Eliminated in some states
Sex-Offender Statutes
Mentally Disordered Sex Offenders: Some sex offenders who are repeatedly found guilty of sex crimes have a mental disorder
Sent to a mental health facility instead of a prison
Most states have been changing or abolishing these laws
In order to be classified as a mentally disordered sex offender, the person must be a good candidate for treatment
Difficult judgment to make
Racial bias often affects the use of the classification
Considered an attractive alternative to imprisonment
State legislatures and courts are now less concerned than they used to be about the rights and needs of sex offenders
Sexually Violent Predator Laws: Laws that call for certain sex offenders who’ve been convicted of sex crimes and have served their sentence in prison to be removed from prison before their release and committed involuntarily to a mental hospital
Requires both treatment and imprisonment
Criminal Commitment and Incompetence to Stand Trial
Mentally Incompetence: A state of mental instability that leaves defendants unable to understand the legal charges and proceedings they are facing and unable to prepare an adequate defense with their attorney
Psychological evaluation on an inpatient basis
If declared incompetent, they will be assigned to a mental health facility until competent to stand trial
Majority of criminals currently institutionalized for psychological treatment in the US are convicted inmates whose psychological problems have led prison officials to decide they need treatment
An incompetent defendant can’t be indefinitely committed
Found competent and tried
Set free
Transferred to a mental health facility under civil commitment procedures
Jail Diversion: When defendants with relatively minor charges are treated on an outpatient basis
Civil Commitment: A legal process by which a person can be forced to undergo mental health treatment
Why Commit?
Individuals are considered to be in need of treatment and dangerous to themselves or others
Parens Patriae: The state can take action to protect patients from self-harm, including through involuntarily hospitalizing them
Police Power: The state can take steps to protect society from a person who is dangerous
Procedures for Civil Commitment
Family members often begin commitment proceedings
For minors, a hearing isn’t necessary, as long as a qualified mental health professional considers commitment necessary
For adults
Mental examination
Clear and convincing proof that they are mentally ill and have met the state’s criteria for involuntary commitment
Can contest the commitment in court
Emergency Commitment
Clinicians have the right to certify that certain patients need temporary commitment and medication
States require certification by two physicians
Length varies from state to state
Usually three days
Who is Dangerous?
90% of ppl w/ mental disorders aren’t violent or dangerous
People with severe mental disorders are somewhat more likely than the general population to perform violent behaviors
Severe substance use disorder
Impulse control disorder
Antisocial personality disorder
Psychotic disorders
Psychiatrists and psychologists are often wrong when they make long-term predictions of violence
Overestimate the likelihood that a patient will eventually be violent
Short-term predictions tend to be more accurate
Problems with Civil Commitment?
Difficulty in assessing a person’s dangerousness
Legal definitions of “mental illness” and “dangerousness” are vague
Many people committed involuntarily don’t respond well to therapy
Risk assessment
Protecting Patient’s Rights
How is the Right to Treatment Protected?
Right to Treatment: State is constitutionally obligated to provide adequate treatment to all people committed involuntarily
Institutions must review patients’ cases periodically
State cannot continue to institutionalize ppl against their will if they aren’t dangerous and are capable of surviving on their own
Protection and advocacy systems
How is the Right to Refuse Treatment Protected?
Right to Refuse Treatment: The legal right of patients to refuse certain forms of treatment
Consistently granted patients the right to refuse psychosurgery
Acknowledged the right to refuse ECT
Patient must be informed fully
Patient must give written consent
Can still be forced on committed patients in some states
Some states have granted patients the right to refuse medication
What other rights do patients have?
Patients who work in mental institutions are guaranteed to at least a minimum wage
Patients released from state mental hospitals have a right to aftercare and to an appropriate community residence
People with psychological disorders should receive treatment in the least restrictive facility available
The “Rights” Debate
Patients’ rights rulings and laws may unintentionally deprive patients of opportunities for recovery
Clinical field hasn’t always done an effective job of protecting patients’ rights
Malpractice Suits: A lawsuit charging a therapist with improper conduct in the course of treatment
Patient’s attempted suicide, sexual activity with a patient, failure to obtain informed consent for a treatment, etc etc
Fear of malpractice suits can have significant effects on clinical decisions and practice
Professional Boundaries
More authority given to psychologists
Blurred the lines that once separated psychiatry from psychology
Psychologists are allowed to pursue extensive educational and training programs in prescription services and receive certification to prescribe meds if they pass
Jury Specialists: A subsect of clinical specialists who advise lawyers about which potential jurors are likely to favor their side and which strategies are likely to win jurors’ support during trials
Might not be more valid than a lawyer’s instincts
Judgments aren’t particularly accurate
Psychological Research of Legal Topics
Eyewitness Testimony
70% of wrongful convictions were based on mistaken eyewitness testimony
Eyewitnesses sometimes hold subtle biases
Most crimes are unexpected and fleeting and therefore can’t be remembered well
It’s easy to fool participants by introducing misinformation
Accuracy is heavily influenced by the method used in identification
Patterns of Criminality
Psychological profiles aren’t nearly as revealing or influential as thought to be
Criminal Minds lied 🙁
Perpetrators of particular kinds of crimes frequently share a number of traits and background features
Code of ethics: A body of principles and rules for ethical behavior, designed to guide decisions and actions by members of a profession
Confidentiality: The principle that certain professionals will not divulge the information they obtain from a client
Duty to Protect: The principle that therapists must break confidentiality in order to protect a person who may be the intended victim of a client
Over 40% of workers find their jobs very stressful and believe them to be bad for their mental health and general wealth
Stress affects home life and personal functioning of employees as well as performance and productivity in the workplace
Employee Assistance Programs: Mental health services made available by a place of business
Can be run by mental health professionals who work directly for a company
Can be run by outside mental health agencies
Stress Reduction Programs: Workshops or group sessions in which mental health professionals teach employees techniques for coping, solving problems, and handling and reducing stress
Government funding for services to people with psychological disorders has risen sharply over the past five decades
Government funding for mental health services is insufficient
Managed Care Programs: The insurance company determines which therapists clients may choose from, the cost of sessions, and the number of sessions for which a client may be reimbursed
Many therapists and clients dislike managed care programs and peer reviews
Breaches confidentiality
Importance of therapy is difficult to convey in a brief report
Priorities of these programs shorten therapy
Favors short-term treatments over long-term improvement
Reimbursements for mental disorders are lower than those for physical disorders
Digital world provides new triggers for the expression of abnormal behavior
ex: those with gambling disorder can now gamble online
Constant internet browsing may shorten people’s attention spans
Today’s technology is helping to produce new psychological disorders
Internet Use Disorder
Even everyday social networking can contribute to psychological dysfunction
Peer pressure
Social anxiety
May lead shy or socially anxious ppl to withdraw from irl relationships
Telemental Health: The use of various technologies to deliver mental health services without the therapist being physically present
There is a lack of quality control - some websites for mental health info offer misinformation
As many as 84% of therapists report having been in therapy at least once
Forensic Psychology: The branch of psychology concerned with intersections between psychological practice and research and the judicial system
Courts need to know whether defendants are responsible for the crimes they commit and capable of defending themselves in court
Criminal Commitment: A legal process by which people accused of a crime are instead judged mentally unstable and sent to a treatment facility
Not guilty by reason of Insanity: A verdict stating that defendants are not guilty of a crime because they were mentally unstable at the time of their crimes
Another form - people are judged mentally unstable at the time of their trial
Committed for treatment until they’re competent to stand trial
Criminal Commitment and Insanity During Commission of a Crime
Defense’s burden is to prove that defendants are insane
Insanity is a legal term
M’Naghten Test: A legal test that holds people to be insane at the time they committed crime if, because of a mental disorder, they didn’t know the nature of the act or didn’t know right from wrong
Irresistible Impulse Test: A legal test that hold people to be insane at the time they committed a crime if they were driven to do so by an uncontrollable “fit of passion”
Durham Test: A legal test that holds people to be insane at the time they committed a crime if their act was the result of a mental disorder
American Law Institute test: A legal test that combines aspects of the M’Naghten, irresistible impulse, and Durham tests
More than 80% of defendants who are acquitted of a crime by reason of insanity qualify for a diagnosis of schizophrenia or another form of psychosis
Concerns raised by the Insanity Defense
Legal definitions of insanity and responsibility will differ from those suggested by clinical research
Lack of professional agreement about abnormal behavior
Clinicians can never be entirely certain that their assessments of mental instability at the time of the crime are accurate
Allows criminals to escape punishment
Public dramatically overestimates the percentage of defendants who plead insanity
Only a minority of defendants fake or exaggerate their psychological symptoms
Offenders are being released earlier and earlier
Increasing effectiveness of drug therapy and other treatments
Growing reaction against extended institutionalization
More emphasis on patients’ rights
Outpatient Commitment: A way of maintaining control over offenders even after their release using community treatment, patient monitoring, and rehospitalization if necessary
Other Verdicts Available
Guilty but Mentally Ill: A verdict stating that defendants are guilty of committing a crime but are also suffering from a mental illness that should be treated during their imprisonment
Hasn’t reduced the number of not guilty by reason of insanity verdicts
Often confuses jurors
Appropriate mental health care is supposed to be available to all prisoners anyway
Guilty with Diminished Capacity: A defendant’s mental dysfunction is viewed as an extenuating circumstance that the court should take into consideration in determining the precise crime of which they are guilty
Because of mental dysfunction, the defendant couldn’t have intended to commit a particular crime
Can be found guilty of a lesser crime
Eliminated in some states
Sex-Offender Statutes
Mentally Disordered Sex Offenders: Some sex offenders who are repeatedly found guilty of sex crimes have a mental disorder
Sent to a mental health facility instead of a prison
Most states have been changing or abolishing these laws
In order to be classified as a mentally disordered sex offender, the person must be a good candidate for treatment
Difficult judgment to make
Racial bias often affects the use of the classification
Considered an attractive alternative to imprisonment
State legislatures and courts are now less concerned than they used to be about the rights and needs of sex offenders
Sexually Violent Predator Laws: Laws that call for certain sex offenders who’ve been convicted of sex crimes and have served their sentence in prison to be removed from prison before their release and committed involuntarily to a mental hospital
Requires both treatment and imprisonment
Criminal Commitment and Incompetence to Stand Trial
Mentally Incompetence: A state of mental instability that leaves defendants unable to understand the legal charges and proceedings they are facing and unable to prepare an adequate defense with their attorney
Psychological evaluation on an inpatient basis
If declared incompetent, they will be assigned to a mental health facility until competent to stand trial
Majority of criminals currently institutionalized for psychological treatment in the US are convicted inmates whose psychological problems have led prison officials to decide they need treatment
An incompetent defendant can’t be indefinitely committed
Found competent and tried
Set free
Transferred to a mental health facility under civil commitment procedures
Jail Diversion: When defendants with relatively minor charges are treated on an outpatient basis
Civil Commitment: A legal process by which a person can be forced to undergo mental health treatment
Why Commit?
Individuals are considered to be in need of treatment and dangerous to themselves or others
Parens Patriae: The state can take action to protect patients from self-harm, including through involuntarily hospitalizing them
Police Power: The state can take steps to protect society from a person who is dangerous
Procedures for Civil Commitment
Family members often begin commitment proceedings
For minors, a hearing isn’t necessary, as long as a qualified mental health professional considers commitment necessary
For adults
Mental examination
Clear and convincing proof that they are mentally ill and have met the state’s criteria for involuntary commitment
Can contest the commitment in court
Emergency Commitment
Clinicians have the right to certify that certain patients need temporary commitment and medication
States require certification by two physicians
Length varies from state to state
Usually three days
Who is Dangerous?
90% of ppl w/ mental disorders aren’t violent or dangerous
People with severe mental disorders are somewhat more likely than the general population to perform violent behaviors
Severe substance use disorder
Impulse control disorder
Antisocial personality disorder
Psychotic disorders
Psychiatrists and psychologists are often wrong when they make long-term predictions of violence
Overestimate the likelihood that a patient will eventually be violent
Short-term predictions tend to be more accurate
Problems with Civil Commitment?
Difficulty in assessing a person’s dangerousness
Legal definitions of “mental illness” and “dangerousness” are vague
Many people committed involuntarily don’t respond well to therapy
Risk assessment
Protecting Patient’s Rights
How is the Right to Treatment Protected?
Right to Treatment: State is constitutionally obligated to provide adequate treatment to all people committed involuntarily
Institutions must review patients’ cases periodically
State cannot continue to institutionalize ppl against their will if they aren’t dangerous and are capable of surviving on their own
Protection and advocacy systems
How is the Right to Refuse Treatment Protected?
Right to Refuse Treatment: The legal right of patients to refuse certain forms of treatment
Consistently granted patients the right to refuse psychosurgery
Acknowledged the right to refuse ECT
Patient must be informed fully
Patient must give written consent
Can still be forced on committed patients in some states
Some states have granted patients the right to refuse medication
What other rights do patients have?
Patients who work in mental institutions are guaranteed to at least a minimum wage
Patients released from state mental hospitals have a right to aftercare and to an appropriate community residence
People with psychological disorders should receive treatment in the least restrictive facility available
The “Rights” Debate
Patients’ rights rulings and laws may unintentionally deprive patients of opportunities for recovery
Clinical field hasn’t always done an effective job of protecting patients’ rights
Malpractice Suits: A lawsuit charging a therapist with improper conduct in the course of treatment
Patient’s attempted suicide, sexual activity with a patient, failure to obtain informed consent for a treatment, etc etc
Fear of malpractice suits can have significant effects on clinical decisions and practice
Professional Boundaries
More authority given to psychologists
Blurred the lines that once separated psychiatry from psychology
Psychologists are allowed to pursue extensive educational and training programs in prescription services and receive certification to prescribe meds if they pass
Jury Specialists: A subsect of clinical specialists who advise lawyers about which potential jurors are likely to favor their side and which strategies are likely to win jurors’ support during trials
Might not be more valid than a lawyer’s instincts
Judgments aren’t particularly accurate
Psychological Research of Legal Topics
Eyewitness Testimony
70% of wrongful convictions were based on mistaken eyewitness testimony
Eyewitnesses sometimes hold subtle biases
Most crimes are unexpected and fleeting and therefore can’t be remembered well
It’s easy to fool participants by introducing misinformation
Accuracy is heavily influenced by the method used in identification
Patterns of Criminality
Psychological profiles aren’t nearly as revealing or influential as thought to be
Criminal Minds lied 🙁
Perpetrators of particular kinds of crimes frequently share a number of traits and background features
Code of ethics: A body of principles and rules for ethical behavior, designed to guide decisions and actions by members of a profession
Confidentiality: The principle that certain professionals will not divulge the information they obtain from a client
Duty to Protect: The principle that therapists must break confidentiality in order to protect a person who may be the intended victim of a client
Over 40% of workers find their jobs very stressful and believe them to be bad for their mental health and general wealth
Stress affects home life and personal functioning of employees as well as performance and productivity in the workplace
Employee Assistance Programs: Mental health services made available by a place of business
Can be run by mental health professionals who work directly for a company
Can be run by outside mental health agencies
Stress Reduction Programs: Workshops or group sessions in which mental health professionals teach employees techniques for coping, solving problems, and handling and reducing stress
Government funding for services to people with psychological disorders has risen sharply over the past five decades
Government funding for mental health services is insufficient
Managed Care Programs: The insurance company determines which therapists clients may choose from, the cost of sessions, and the number of sessions for which a client may be reimbursed
Many therapists and clients dislike managed care programs and peer reviews
Breaches confidentiality
Importance of therapy is difficult to convey in a brief report
Priorities of these programs shorten therapy
Favors short-term treatments over long-term improvement
Reimbursements for mental disorders are lower than those for physical disorders
Digital world provides new triggers for the expression of abnormal behavior
ex: those with gambling disorder can now gamble online
Constant internet browsing may shorten people’s attention spans
Today’s technology is helping to produce new psychological disorders
Internet Use Disorder
Even everyday social networking can contribute to psychological dysfunction
Peer pressure
Social anxiety
May lead shy or socially anxious ppl to withdraw from irl relationships
Telemental Health: The use of various technologies to deliver mental health services without the therapist being physically present
There is a lack of quality control - some websites for mental health info offer misinformation
As many as 84% of therapists report having been in therapy at least once