Title: Beyond Talking Heads: Sourced Comics and the Affordances of Multimodality
Authors: Hannah Dickinson and Maggie M. Werner
Source Info: Composition Studies, Spring 2015, Vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 51-74
Key Idea: Analyzes sourced comics as pedagogical tools for developing both alphabetic and multimodal literacies.
Definition and Purpose: Sourced comics help students explore their relationships with scholarly sources, recognizing power relations and expanding their engagement strategies.
Pedagogical Value:
Help demystify scholarly engagements.
Offer multiple design elements for deeper understanding.
Methodology: Based on an assignment requiring students to create comics engaging in conversation with scholars.
Metaphor of Conversation: Academic discourse is often framed as a conversation, a metaphor that often confuses students about their role.
Previous Literature: Highlights perspectives from Bruffee, Ellis, Graff and Birkenstein, Harris, and others.
Resources Utilized: Comic Life 2 for comic creation.
Classes Involved: Three different composition classes including introductory and advanced levels.
Student Demographics: 60% women and 40% students of color, with considerations on racial and gender implications on student positioning.
Outcomes: Student-created comics provided insights into their relationships with scholarly sources:
Illustrated power imbalances and negotiation strategies.
Revealed that students rarely considered themselves equals to scholars, often taking positions of learner, experiencer, or organizer.
Examples of Roles:
Learner: Students acknowledged their novice status and sought guidance from scholars.
Experiencer: Some referenced their own experiences, creating personal authority in discussions.
Organizer: Some positioned themselves as facilitators of conversations among scholars, enhancing their own authority through organization.
Multimodal Engagement: Comics encourage broader literacy by combining text and imagery.
Critical Engagement: Help reveal and question power dynamics in academic conversations.
Challenge the notion of equality in scholarly discourse.
Visual and Gestural Strategies: Students used design choices to convey their positions and experiences.
Design Complexity: Comics are seen as multi-layered texts that allow for better representation of thought processes during research and writing.
Role of Teacher vs. Students: Instructors can gain insights into student struggles with source integration and the negotiation of authority.
Redefining Academic Conversation: Students' perceptions show a need for re-evaluating the metaphor of conversation in an academic context, recognizing inherent power imbalances.
Contributions to Pedagogy: Encourages a pedagogical approach informed by social justice, guiding instructors in addressing power relations in academic discourse.
Acknowledgements: Inspiration and funding sources were recognized for supporting this research project.
References: An extensive list of cited works includes foundational texts by Jacobs, Bartholomae, and more, underscoring the article's academic grounding.