Chapter 4 Foundations of American Democracy
Enlightenment Philosophies
- Framers lived at a time when there were new ideas about government organization/function * Challenged systems already in place
- Enlightenment (18th century): a philosophical movement that began in Western Europe with roots in Scientific Revolution * Use of reason over tradition when solving social problems
- Thomas Hobbes (Leviathan - 1660): believed that people could not govern themselves and that a monarch with absolute power would protect life best * Advocated for rule of law * with government: some freedoms sacrificed (respecting government) in exchange for government protection
- John Locke (Second Treatise on Civil Government - 1690): natural rights must be protected * Empiricism: people are born with a tabula rasa (blank slate) on equal footing and everything they do is shaped by experience * (life, liberty, property) are granted by God and government must protect them * Right to revolution if natural rights are taken away
- Charles de Montesquieu (De l’Esprit des Lois/The Spirit of the Laws - 1748): separation of power into three branches of government * Checks and balances limited power of each branch
- Jean-Jacques Rousseau (The Social Contract - 1762): people are born good but corrupted by society and should act for the greater good rather than out of self-interest
- Voltaire (Candide): satirical novel, reflected dislike of Christian power and nobles * Rationality, advocate of freedom of thought, speech, religion, and politics
- Denis Diderot: producer/editor of first encyclopedia, wanted to change the ways people thought by adding his own/others’ philosophies to his work * Advocate of freedom of expression and universal education access * Criticized divine right, traditional values, and religion
- Philosophers favored democracy over absolute monarchy
- Forms of representative democracy: * Participatory democracy: broad participation in politics/society by people at various statuses * Pluralist democracy: group-based activism by citizens with common interests who seek the same goals * Elite democracy: power to the educated/wealthy, discourages participation by the majority of people
- : supports individualism and natural rights, popular sovereignty (people give the government power), encourages civic participation * American Republicanism characterized by * Elected officials representing a group of people * : government power derives from the consent of the governed (ex. elections, protests)
@@The Declaration of Independence@@
- A formal declaration of war between America and Great Britain
- Written by Thomas Jefferson
- List of grievances (“crimes” King George III committed against the colonies) * Used to explain why the colonies are declaring independence
- Used as a template by other nations declaring independence
The Weaknesses of the @@Articles of Confederation@@
- Outlined the first government of the United States of America
- Predecessor to the Constitution
- Followed from 1776 to 1781; ratified and named in 1781
- Accomplishments: * Created : the way in which federal and state/regional governments Interact and share power * Ended the Revolutionary War on favorable terms for the United States (Treaty of Paris - 1783) * Established the Northwest Ordinance, which created methods through which states would enter the US
- Weaknesses: * 1787: trade between states declined, monetary value dropped, foreign countries posed threats, social disorder throughout the country * (1786-1787): 6-month rebellion formed by over 1,000 farmers in which a federal arsenal was attacked in protest of the foreclosure of farms in western Massachusetts * Major concern at the Constitutional Convention * Exposed issues with Articles of Confederation and showed necessity of a strong central government * Could not impose taxes (result of taxation without representation); only state governments could levy taxes * National government was in debt from the Revolutionary War had no way to pay for expenses * Could only acquire money by requesting it from states, borrowing from other governments, or selling lands in the West * No national military; could not draft soldiers * No national currency * No Supreme Court to interpret law * No executive branch to enforce laws * No control over taxes imposed between states and could not control interstate trade * Needed unanimous votes to amend the Articles * 9/13 states had to approve legislation before it was passed * Could not control states * No enforcement mechanisms/requests from within federal government * Needed to be revised * Constitutional Convention created Constitution * resulted in complete rewrite of the Articles => Constitution
The Constitutional Convention
- Meeting of the framers in 1787 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania * Division over powers, structure, and responsibilities of government * Some believed that the government under the Articles was too weak, others believed that it shouldn’t be changed * Generally accepted as pragmatists who tried to protect their and everyone else’s property + rights * Stronger central gov’t necessary, potential to be corrupted * Federal legislature had two main issues: * Unicameral (single house) vs bicameral (two house) legislative branch * Madison’s : bicameral legislature based on population size * Supported by larger states b/c of better representation * : unicameral legislature, one vote per state * Similar to Articles of Confederation * Smaller states worried that gov’t would be dominated by larger states * (Connecticut Compromise): a bicameral legislature with a House of Representatives (population) and Senate (equal representation) * Representation of enslaved people * Northerners: enslaved people should not be counted for electoral votes * Southerners: enslaved people should be counted for electoral votes * Larger population when enslaved people were counted * : enslaved people would be counted as 3/5 of a person when deciding seats in the House of Representatives * Authority to enforce laws * Created chief executive (president) * Enforcer of the law, could keep the legislative branch in check * Presidential approval required before bills become law * President can veto acts of legislature * Congress can override veto if 2/3 of both houses vote * Supreme Court * Could mediate disputes between legislative and executive branches, between states, and between state + federal government * Acceptance of the Constitution * Had to be submitted to states for ratification * : supporters of the Constitution, advocated for a strong central government * Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay wrote @@The Federalist Papers@@: a collection of articles supporting the Constitution * Best reflects original intent of the framers * Persuaded states of the superiority of a strong central government plus power kept by the states * : opponents of the Constitution, preferred smaller state governments (Articles of Confederation) * Believed that the Constitution would threaten personal liberties and make the president a king * Feared tyranny + abuse of power * Wanted a @@Bill of Rights@@: protects the rights of citizens from the government * Guaranteed by the Federalists and was added immediately after ratification * 10 amendments written by James Madison * Created the : composed of elected officials from each state based on population (each given 2 votes + 1 vote per member of House of Representatives) with a total of 538 electors * Originally created because the framers didn’t trust American citizens to be educated enough to choose a good president * Thought the Electoral College would protect election against the influence of small groups * Would ensure that states with larger populations didn’t completely overpower smaller states * The presidential candidate who wins 270 electoral votes wins the election regardless of who wins popular vote
The Federalist Papers and Anti-Federalist Dissent
@@Brutus No. 1@@
- Anonymous author (pseudonym Brutus) asked questions about + critiqued the draft of the Constitution
- The first publication that began a series of essays known as the Federalist and Anti-Federalist Papers
- National government had too much power, an army could prevent liberty, and representatives may not truly be representative of the people
- Major dissent: The Federalist Papers attempted to answer questions and address concerns posed by Brutus + other Anti-Federalists
@@Federalist No. 10@@
- Written by James Madison
- Addresses dangers of factions + how to protect minority interest groups in a nation ruled by majority
- Argues that a large republic keeps any single faction from taking control
- Major dissent: Anti-Federalists thought that Madison’s claims were unrealistic and that a country with multiple factions could never create a good union * Believed that no large nation could survive and that states’ separate interests would fracture the republic
@@Federalist No. 51@@
- Written by James Madison
- Argued that separation of powers would make the government efficient, dividing responsibilities and tasks
- Major dissent: Anti-Federalists believed that there was no perfect separation of powers and that one branch of government would eventually hold more power
@@Federalist No. 70@@
- Written by Alexander Hamilton
- Argued that the executive branch should only have one member: the president * Used the British monarchy as an example: the king had power but was checked by the House of Commons
- Proposed term limits as another way to limit the president’s power (not set until the 22nd Amendment in 1951)
- Major dissent: Anti-Federalists believed that only the president’s staff would influence him and disagreed with giving control of the military to one person
@@Federalist No. 78@@
- Written by Alexander Hamilton
- Addressed concerns about the power of the judicial branch
- Argued that the judicial branch would have the least amount of power under the Constitution but would also have the power of judicial review * Check on Congress
- Major dissent: Anti-Federalists claimed that a federal judiciary could overpower states’ judiciaries and that judges’ lifetime appointments could result in corruption
The Constitution as an Instrument of Government
- The Constitution is vague and only outlines the government structure * Written to allow change through amendments * Branches of government have evolved since ratification
- : set up the three branches of government (in order): * branch * branch * “The executive power shall be vested in a President of the United states of America” * Power to issue * Same effect as law, bypasses Congress in policy-making * Not mentioned in the Constitution * Used as part of the enforcement duties * Ex. Executive Order 9066: FDR ordered people (Japanese and German Americans) from a military zone * between country leaders are similar to treaties * Bypass ratification power of the Senate * Not mentioned in the Constitution * branch * %%Marbury v. Madison (1803)%%: Supreme Court increased its own power by giving itself the power to overturn laws passed by legislature ()
- Article I, Section 8 - the : allows Congress to make any legislation that seems “necessary and proper” to carry through its powers * Aka the elastic clause * Ex. nothing in the Constitution that creates the Federal Reserve System (central bank), nothing about the executive branch’s cabinet * Federal District Courts and Courts of Appeals both created by Congress
- : supremacy of Constitution and federal laws over state laws * “and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof…shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding”
- A system of government under which the national and local governments share powers
- Ex. Germany, Switzerland, and Australia
- Confederation: a system in which decisions are made by an external member-state legislation; decisions on daily issues are taken by special majorities, consensus, or unanimity
- Supreme Court cases: * %%McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)%%: court ruled that states could not tax national bank * Reinforced supremacy clause of Constitution - issues between state + federal government laws should be ruled in favor of federal * Necessary and proper clause - banks were necessary to implement federal powers * %%United States v. Lopez (1995)%%: challenge to the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990 (banned guns on school property) * Held that didn't allow regulation of carrying guns * New phase of federalism - state sovereignty and local control were important
Powers Under Federalism
- : powers that belong to the national government * Ex. printing money, regulating interstate + international trade, making treaties + conducting foreign policy, declaring war, est. post offices, lower courts, rules of naturalization, and copyright/patent laws; raising + supporting armed forces, making all laws “necessary and proper” to carry out duties
- : powers that belong to the states * : include any that the Constitution neither gives to the national government nor denies to the states * Ex. issuing licenses, regulating intrastate business, conducting elections, est. local governments, maintaining a justice system, educating residents, maintaining a militia, providing public health, safety, and welfare programs
- : shared by federal and state governments * Ex. levying/collecting taxes, building roads, operating courts, establishing courts, chartering banks + corps, eminent domain, paying debts, borrowing money
- Constitution specifies which powers are denied to national government and states
- Constitution makes federal government guarantee states a republican government and protection against rebellion + invasion * Prevents states from dividing or combining without congressional approval
- States are required to accept court rulings, licenses, contracts, or other civil acts of other states
- Changed over time * First: federal/state governments were independent * Most Americans had contact w/government on state level
- Denied powers: * Federal government: * Suspend writ of habeas corpus except during a national crisis * Pass ex post facto laws or issuance of bills of attainder * Impose export taxes * Use money from treasury without appropriations bill * Grant titles of nobility * State government: * Enter into treaties w/other countries * Declare war * Maintain an army * Print money * Pass ex post facto laws or issuance of bills of attainder * Grant titles of nobilities * Impose import or export duties
- Federal government programs * Most administered through states * Paid for by federal government through grants-in-aid * Some politicians tie strings to grants (federal government still in control over money) * Other politicians want no strings attached (state/local government decides how to spend) * Grants: * : aid with strict rules from the federal government about how it is used * Used by those who favor federal power * : aid that lets the state use the money how it wants * Used by those who favor states’ rights * Federal government can still use techniques to make states follow federal law * Ex. direct orders, preemption
- Advantages of federalism: * Mass participation (many can participate on many issues) * Regional autonomy (states still have some powers) * Multi-level government (local, state, federal; many politicians connected to supporters) * Innovative methods (states can experiment with policies) * Diffusion of power (no party domination) * Diversity in government
- Disadvantages of federalism * Lack of consistency (differing policies creates inequality in states) * Inefficiency (overlapping/contradictory policies) * Bureaucracy (corruption/stalemate through spread-out power) * Resistance * Inequity (legislation/judicial outcomes)
- Borrowed idea from French political philosopher Charles de Montesquieu
- Assigned different tasks to each branch of government * Legislative branch makes laws * Executive branch enforces laws * Judicial branch interprets laws
- Prevents a person from being in more than one branch at a time * Has to resign in order to change positions

System of
- Designed to prevent any branch of government from becoming dominant
- Requires different branches to work together and share power * Examples: * Nomination of federal judges, cabinet officials, and ambassadors * President chooses nominees who must be approved by the Senate * Negotiation of treaties * President is empowered to negotiate treaties, but they cannot go into effect until approved by 2/3 of the Senate * Enactment of legislation * Congress passes legislation, but the president can (reject) laws * Encourages Congress to pass laws that align with the president’s views or negotiate to avoid being vetoed * Congress can override veto by passing a law with 2/3 majority in both houses * Law becomes law regardless of president * Courts can determine constitutionality of law and overturn laws if they are unconstitutional
Amendment Process
- : the addition of a provision to the Constitution
- Main process: * Proposed amendment must be approved by 2/3 of both houses of Congress * 3/4 of state legislatures must (approve) the amendment, and the states themselves are allowed to determine the votes required to ratify the amendment * Congress can also mandate that each state use a (delegates elected to vote on the amendment) * Used once to ratify the 21st amendment (1933) - ended prohibition
- Another process: * 2/3 of state legislatures petition Congress for a * Never happened before
State and Local Governments
- State governments * Can take any form, but must have a state constitution approved by Congress * Most structured after federal government * Executive branch led by * Direct state executive agencies (education, roads/building, policing) * Command state National Guard * May grant and * Most can appoint state judges with the “advice and consent” of a state legislative body * Can veto state legislation * May use a to reject parts of bills * Denied to presidents by Supreme Court - would take too much power away from legislature * 49/50 states have bicameral legislatures * Enact state law * Can override the (governor) * State judiciaries interpret state law * Trial courts and appeals courts * Hear criminal cases and civil cases (lawsuits)
\