Essential Reading
Mark Horton and Asmas El-Ganainy, “Fiscal Policy: Taking and Giving Away,” International Monetary Fund.
“COVID-19 Government Stimulus and Financial Relief Guide,” Investopedia. Read only section on the United States.
Video Lecture
The federal reserve
feds chair often called 2nd most powerful official in D.C
Federal government taken control of the economy since the 1930s
1930s great depression
Federal government provided a safety net for the economically week and tightened regulation on businesses
the creation of the securities and exchange commission which regulates stock and bond markets
As well as the Social Security Administration which administers the Social Security program
Before the government didn’t get involved in the economy
since the depression the government has been more involved in the economy to ensure it is more consistent
Fiscal policy
a government's plan for managing the economy through taxation, spending, and borrowing
economic downturn feeds on itself
-firm cuts back on production, accelerating job loss
-consumers cut back on spending, furthering job loss
Keynesian economics- demand side policy
government should increase spending to put more money in peoples hand which would then spend and stimulate higher job growth
this was used for much of Franklin Roosevelts new deal
Reaganomics- trickle down economics
Government cuts business tax and upper incomes
wealthy men and businesses would invest more into supply side
increased production then creates jobs and more consuming
demand side policy
puts money directly into consumers hands emphasis on government spending to increase job growth
supply side policy
emphasises tax cuts for businesses and the rich in the hope they will invest more into industry supplying more jobs
Monetary policy
economy weak→ Increase in money supply → more money in circulation means firms and consumers have more money to invest and spend
he recognised the fed had the means to do this job
Feds Monetary policy tools
lower or raise interest rate on its loans to member banks
Lower or raise reserve rate (percentage member banks must keep on deposit)
Buy or sell securities (investments)
Buying securities gives more money to sellers
Supply side fiscal policy example
George W. Bush 2001 Recession
Tax cuts in the highest marginal rate on personal income from 39.6 to 35%
targeting high income tax payers so they would invest much of the money and give the economy a boost
Split democrats and republicans completely
supply side fits small government policy of the republicans
Effect of Bush tax cuts
The congressional budget office claimed the tax cuts had a modest impact on the economy
The tax cuts were too large to be paid back later and added 100 billion to US debt
it only added to the American economic divide
In 2008 Bush enacted a tax rebate which gave $300 per adult and dependent child for people earning under 75,000 and married couples over 150,000
Democrats backed this bill stronger than the Republicans
This cost $150 billion dollars
An even larger demand side stimulus bill was enacted by congress in 2009 under Obama costing $787 billion
This included road construction, updating the electricity grid, unemployment assistance and enabling states and local governments to retain their workers and services
the aim was to put money in peoples pockets
democrats backed it almost completely
on 3 republicans in both chambers backed this
This bill increased the number of full time-equivalent jobs by 2.0 to 5.2 million
however it added significantly to federal debt
Republicans blocked the second bill
Lowering the reserve rate was no longer going to work as banks had lots of cash in hand
In order to stimulate the demand for loans the fed rapidly dropped interest rates it charged member banks for loans
dropping from 5% to 1% by 2009 and the 0.25%
the fed also bought securities in at a fast rate
The fed then resorted to using quantitative easing where the fed creates money in order to buy securities from banks
The fed essentially just printed more money from 2009-2014
they spent over $3 trillion on quantitative easing
however the fed contributed the most out all the institutions for the economic recovery
monetary policy however holds that if money supply is excessive and there is too much money in circulation inflation will occur
Critics of the fed point out much of the money didn’t go into the consumers pocket but went to the banks and then the stock market and widened gap between poor and wealthy
monetary policy is more flexible than fiscal
the fed can change its interest rates quickly and is independent from partisan deadlock
the feds chair are nominated by executive but are able to operate on their own
The TARP programme bailed out banks and allowed people to loose their homes which put congress under much scrutiny
However the fed contributed much more money to banks yet didn’t face scrutiny as it was done in secrecy until it came out 3 years later. The fed outlined how they used it to mask Americas economic crisis
The fed need to be independent to protect minority rights
The economic downturn caused by the covid pandemic
economic fallout was rapid and severe
millions loss their jobs and 100,000s businesses shut down
Congress responded with several trillion dollars in stimulus spending
unemployment benefits and grants to firms were just a couple of things these grants covered
most received a direct cash payment from the federal government
Monetary
Fed cut interest to 0
and provided emergency loans
this prevented the toll from becoming even larger
Summary
Great depression was watershed moment for federal involvement in economy
Keynesian economics
democrats favour demand side fiscal increasing grants to consumers
republicans favour supply side fiscal cutting taxes for the rich and businesses
monetary policy- enacted through federal reserve, employs reserve rates, interest rates and the buying and selling of securities + quantitative easing