Says you are the same person because you have the same soul, not necessarily the same body or memories.
Example: If your soul went into someone else's body, you would still be you.
Readings:
Gertler (p.113): Probably defends the idea that the mind/soul is separate from the body.
Hasker & Taliaferro: Argue that your soul could live on after death.
Clarence Darrow: Might criticize the soul theory (says there’s no proof of the soul).
🧠 Easy Summary:
Soul Theory says you're the same person because of your soul. But some people ask: how do we know souls are even real?
💡 Big Question: Are you the same person because of your body or brain?
You’re the same person as long as you have the same body.
Problem: What if your brain is damaged but your body is alive?
You are your brain. If your brain moves to a new body, you go with it.
Readings:
Eric Olson: Says we are just human animals, and psychology (like memory) doesn’t matter as much.
Karen Quinlan case: A real woman in a coma. Her body was alive but her mind wasn’t working. Is she still the same person?
Parfit: Says identity might not matter. What matters is psychological continuity—your thoughts, memories, personality.
🧠 Easy Summary:
Body and brain theorists say identity depends on your physical parts. But if your brain or memories change, are you still you?
💡 Big Question: Is your identity based on your memories?
You are the same person if you remember your past actions.
If someone has your memories, then they are you—even in a different body.
If you forget something, you’re not the same person in that way.
Readings:
Locke (pp.48–50): Explains his memory theory.
Perry (pp.54–61): Uses fun examples like switching bodies to test Locke’s idea.
🧠 Easy Summary:
If you can remember doing something, Locke says it was you. But memory can be tricky—what if you forget something? Does that mean you're not the same person anymore?
💡 Big Question: Do we have free will, or is everything already determined?
Everything you do is caused by something else (your brain, your environment, etc.).
You think you’re choosing, but you’re not. Everything is determined by natural laws.
Readings:
D’Holbach: Says free will is just an illusion.
Vaidman (Many Worlds): In quantum physics, maybe many outcomes happen—but that still might not give us free will.
McKenna & Coates (Compatibilism): Say we can be free even if the world is determined—as long as we’re acting without being forced.
🧠 Easy Summary:
Hard determinists say you don’t really choose anything. Compatibilists say you can still be free if you’re not being controlled.
What’s the soul theory of identity?
➤ You’re the same person because you have the same soul.
What does Locke say makes you the same person?
➤ Your memories—if you remember doing something, it was you.
What’s Olson’s “animalism” view?
➤ You’re the same person because you’re the same biological human.
What does hard determinism say about free will?
➤ We don’t have free will; everything we do is caused by something else.
How is compatibilism different from hard determinism?
➤ Compatibilism says you can still be responsible for your actions even if the world is determined.