Family Systems Theory Notes
Burgess (1926)
Defined family as “unity of interacting personalities”
Family is the interaction of its members
Family is a living, changing, growing thing or “super personality”
Alive when interacting and die when it ceases
Family types: highly integrated (characterized by rituals, discipline, interdependence, and cooperation) and unintegrated (characterized by lack of previous features)
set of components or processes that interact with one another to achieve a specific object or serve a common purpose or goal
interrelated elements and structure
Interact in patterns
Have boundaries: open and closed
Whole is greater than sum of parts
Messages and rules
Subsystems
System - any set of objects, with their attributes, that relate to each other in a way that creates a new “super entity”
boundary-maintained unit
Interdependent parts, alteration in one part affects all components of system
Family is a social system
Can have subsystems, primarily: parental, spousal, and sibling’
Family roles - recurring patterns of behavior developed through interaction that family members use to fulfill family functions
specific functions for individuals
mover - initiates action
Opposer - disapproves of mover’s actins and tries to block it
Follower - approves of mover or opposer and empowers the allied side
Bystander - witnesses both mover and opposer and doesn’t ally; on periphery of family functions
In dysfunctional families (particularly alcoholic)
dependent - parent with chemical dependency (alcoholic dad, manipulates, denies problem)
Enabler/codependent - helps other avoid consequences of behavior (call work for him, psychosomatic symptoms)
Hero - often 1st born, ideal student and caretaker who has it all together
Delinquent - 2nd born, scapegoated child, bad at school, acts out, negative approach of getting dad to change because they try to turn attention to them—alienating dads need to drink
Invisible child - next child, low profile, stays it of way, never deals with emotions, most likely to suffer emotional illness, hope it will help lessen family tensions
Clown - last child, attempts t use humor in dealing with family problems
Hierarchy
Rank according to authority/power
Family’s arrangement is related to its organization, communication patterns, decision-making process, etc.
Boundaries - lines of demarcation that distinguish a system from its environment and affect the flow of energy and information between the two
Divides system from outside (society)
Types (Kantor and Lehr):
Open - highly interactive with outside environment (family’s democratic, bound together by love and respect; healthy kids and much interaction)
Random - family has no boundaries, few rules exist above demanding “family’s territory”, children don’t feel loved
Closed - extremely private with little eternal interchange (family members enmeshed/overly involved in each other’s lives, value privacy, secretiveness and limit exposure to media: result in emotional illness because individuals can’t think or function on own behalf)
The whole is greater than the sum of the parts
Thank of a cake, individual ingredients are components, what is removed from the oven is very different quality
Society is the environmental context and individual family members are component units
individual and family behavior must be understood in context, understand behavior in context—both within the family context and context of interactions with other systems
Family is a goal-seeking system
they pursue goals and develop tactics to achieve them, through their degree of goal orientation can vary
A family is a self-reflective and self-regulating system, continually influenced by feedback
positive (change-sustaining or enhancing) and negative feedback (attempts to return to previous steady state) can be good or bad
Family systems are defined by communication
communication process allows families to create, preserve, and modify a system’s reality; 2 levels of messages: content level and relationship level (what you say and how you say it, or how they should interpret what’s said; meta communication help articulate needs, clarify misunderstanding, and plan more constructive means for relating to each other)
Locus of pathology is not within the person, but is a system dysfunction
Location of problem not individual but system which they are in is dysfunctional
Mapping the family system
spatial analogies, relational map
Emotional relationships
Family Mapping Proceft
Choose a family portrayed in a television program or movie
Create a symbol for each family member
Arrange the symbols on the sculpture so they express the relationships in the family
Draw any boundary or connecting emotional lines that define the relationships in the family
Write a brief explanation of the family system, explain the components, why you arranged them as you did, they meaning of connecting lines
Pioneer of Family Theory
Beliefs:
family is one unit of complex interactions
Family members emotionally connected
emotional interdependence
See the patient as part of the family system, paying particular attention to families’ struggles to balance togetherness with individualization
triangles
Differentiation of self
Sibling position
Nuclear family emotional process
Family projection process
Societal emotional process
Multigenerational transmissions process
Emotional cutoff
3-person relationship system
Smallest stable relationship system
Building block of larger emotional systems
2-person is unstable—can’t tolerate tension
Triangulation: Dysfunctional (perpetuates problem) vs. Functional (resolves problem)
Differentiated Self
less reactive
Calm emotions
Thoughtful
Don’t give in
Not vulnerable to stress
Independent
Decrease triangulation
Decrease entanglements/problems
Closeness without enmeshment
Better relationships
Undifferentiated Self
more reactive
Less thoughtful
Critical and judgmental
Concerned about approval
Dependent
Increase triangulation
Difficulty with decisions
Poor communication
Repeat problematic relationship
Togetherness vs. separateness—equilibrium
marital conflict
Dysfunction in one spouse
Impairment of one or more children
Emotional distance
Tension/anxiety
emotional tension/stress
Impairs ability
Moves through system form one person to another
parents project emotional responses on children
Ex: Increase need for attention and approval; feeling responsible for the well-being of others
as child leaves nuclear family to establish own family are changes in family system
Over time, generations may be very different in family roles,, expectations, and functions
May be evident in terms of educational level or occupations or family structure
Unresolved issues may result in families curing off contact with adult children
birth order impacts individual responses
Individuals who are in same sibling position have similar personality
1st born = leader
Last born = follower
societal characteristics have influence on family systems
Parenting may have become less rule bound due to societal norms
Tenerelli, D., Weaver, S., and Amstel, N. (2019). Scaffolding or enabling?: Implications of extended parental financial support into adulthood. Journal of Financial Therapy, 10 (2). Article 5
Major points:
parents provide support to adult children
Analysis of situation using Systems Theory
Applying Bowenian Therapy to family situation
Burgess (1926)
Defined family as “unity of interacting personalities”
Family is the interaction of its members
Family is a living, changing, growing thing or “super personality”
Alive when interacting and die when it ceases
Family types: highly integrated (characterized by rituals, discipline, interdependence, and cooperation) and unintegrated (characterized by lack of previous features)
set of components or processes that interact with one another to achieve a specific object or serve a common purpose or goal
interrelated elements and structure
Interact in patterns
Have boundaries: open and closed
Whole is greater than sum of parts
Messages and rules
Subsystems
System - any set of objects, with their attributes, that relate to each other in a way that creates a new “super entity”
boundary-maintained unit
Interdependent parts, alteration in one part affects all components of system
Family is a social system
Can have subsystems, primarily: parental, spousal, and sibling’
Family roles - recurring patterns of behavior developed through interaction that family members use to fulfill family functions
specific functions for individuals
mover - initiates action
Opposer - disapproves of mover’s actins and tries to block it
Follower - approves of mover or opposer and empowers the allied side
Bystander - witnesses both mover and opposer and doesn’t ally; on periphery of family functions
In dysfunctional families (particularly alcoholic)
dependent - parent with chemical dependency (alcoholic dad, manipulates, denies problem)
Enabler/codependent - helps other avoid consequences of behavior (call work for him, psychosomatic symptoms)
Hero - often 1st born, ideal student and caretaker who has it all together
Delinquent - 2nd born, scapegoated child, bad at school, acts out, negative approach of getting dad to change because they try to turn attention to them—alienating dads need to drink
Invisible child - next child, low profile, stays it of way, never deals with emotions, most likely to suffer emotional illness, hope it will help lessen family tensions
Clown - last child, attempts t use humor in dealing with family problems
Hierarchy
Rank according to authority/power
Family’s arrangement is related to its organization, communication patterns, decision-making process, etc.
Boundaries - lines of demarcation that distinguish a system from its environment and affect the flow of energy and information between the two
Divides system from outside (society)
Types (Kantor and Lehr):
Open - highly interactive with outside environment (family’s democratic, bound together by love and respect; healthy kids and much interaction)
Random - family has no boundaries, few rules exist above demanding “family’s territory”, children don’t feel loved
Closed - extremely private with little eternal interchange (family members enmeshed/overly involved in each other’s lives, value privacy, secretiveness and limit exposure to media: result in emotional illness because individuals can’t think or function on own behalf)
The whole is greater than the sum of the parts
Thank of a cake, individual ingredients are components, what is removed from the oven is very different quality
Society is the environmental context and individual family members are component units
individual and family behavior must be understood in context, understand behavior in context—both within the family context and context of interactions with other systems
Family is a goal-seeking system
they pursue goals and develop tactics to achieve them, through their degree of goal orientation can vary
A family is a self-reflective and self-regulating system, continually influenced by feedback
positive (change-sustaining or enhancing) and negative feedback (attempts to return to previous steady state) can be good or bad
Family systems are defined by communication
communication process allows families to create, preserve, and modify a system’s reality; 2 levels of messages: content level and relationship level (what you say and how you say it, or how they should interpret what’s said; meta communication help articulate needs, clarify misunderstanding, and plan more constructive means for relating to each other)
Locus of pathology is not within the person, but is a system dysfunction
Location of problem not individual but system which they are in is dysfunctional
Mapping the family system
spatial analogies, relational map
Emotional relationships
Family Mapping Proceft
Choose a family portrayed in a television program or movie
Create a symbol for each family member
Arrange the symbols on the sculpture so they express the relationships in the family
Draw any boundary or connecting emotional lines that define the relationships in the family
Write a brief explanation of the family system, explain the components, why you arranged them as you did, they meaning of connecting lines
Pioneer of Family Theory
Beliefs:
family is one unit of complex interactions
Family members emotionally connected
emotional interdependence
See the patient as part of the family system, paying particular attention to families’ struggles to balance togetherness with individualization
triangles
Differentiation of self
Sibling position
Nuclear family emotional process
Family projection process
Societal emotional process
Multigenerational transmissions process
Emotional cutoff
3-person relationship system
Smallest stable relationship system
Building block of larger emotional systems
2-person is unstable—can’t tolerate tension
Triangulation: Dysfunctional (perpetuates problem) vs. Functional (resolves problem)
Differentiated Self
less reactive
Calm emotions
Thoughtful
Don’t give in
Not vulnerable to stress
Independent
Decrease triangulation
Decrease entanglements/problems
Closeness without enmeshment
Better relationships
Undifferentiated Self
more reactive
Less thoughtful
Critical and judgmental
Concerned about approval
Dependent
Increase triangulation
Difficulty with decisions
Poor communication
Repeat problematic relationship
Togetherness vs. separateness—equilibrium
marital conflict
Dysfunction in one spouse
Impairment of one or more children
Emotional distance
Tension/anxiety
emotional tension/stress
Impairs ability
Moves through system form one person to another
parents project emotional responses on children
Ex: Increase need for attention and approval; feeling responsible for the well-being of others
as child leaves nuclear family to establish own family are changes in family system
Over time, generations may be very different in family roles,, expectations, and functions
May be evident in terms of educational level or occupations or family structure
Unresolved issues may result in families curing off contact with adult children
birth order impacts individual responses
Individuals who are in same sibling position have similar personality
1st born = leader
Last born = follower
societal characteristics have influence on family systems
Parenting may have become less rule bound due to societal norms
Tenerelli, D., Weaver, S., and Amstel, N. (2019). Scaffolding or enabling?: Implications of extended parental financial support into adulthood. Journal of Financial Therapy, 10 (2). Article 5
Major points:
parents provide support to adult children
Analysis of situation using Systems Theory
Applying Bowenian Therapy to family situation