The evolution of American policing revolves around distinct eras:
Political Era (1830-1900)
Professional Era (1900-1960)
Era of New Development (1960-Present)
Intelligence-led Era (1960-2014)
Post-National Police Crisis Era (2014-Present)
Understanding police history is essential for:
Highlighting the nature of change in policing.
Providing perspective on current policing problems.
Learning about successes and failures in reform initiatives.
Recognizing unintended consequences of reforms.
American policing influenced by:
Tradition of Limited Authority
Emphasis on privacy and civil rights, rooted in the Bill of Rights.
Local Control
Local governments are responsible for organizing and funding their police forces.
Fragmented Structure
Over 17,000 local law enforcement agencies lead to disparities in training, resources, and effectiveness.
Close ties between police and local politicians:
Employment based on political connections.
Police positions as a form of patronage.
Lack of job security.
Low standards for personnel:
No formal education or training required.
Corruption and Bribery
Extensive acceptance of protection payments from local businesses.
Police ignoring laws on gambling and prostitution for payoffs.
Incompetence
Ineffective patrol work due to limited resources and mobility.
Hostile Public Relations
Public distrust and ridicule of police due to corruption.
Conflicts with various community groups, including minorities.
Previous assumptions depict a mixed relationship between police and communities:
Intimacy in some communities vs. conflicts overall.
Records show a more common trend of conflict rather than a widespread amicable relationship.
Transition of police to a recognized profession:
Introduction of personnel standards, uniforms, and formal training.
Reduction of political influence and establishment of specialized units.
Hiring inclusivity for women and minorities, highlighted by Alice Stebbins Wells.
Technological Advances
Introduction of patrol cars, two-way radios, and telephones enhance communication and efficiency.
Strain on police-community relations:
Quasi-military structure fostering alienation.
Civil rights issues and protests exacerbate tensions.
Civil rights movements and student protests highlight systemic issues:
Landmark Supreme Court cases (Miranda v. Arizona, Mapp v. Ohio) increase accountability.
Increasingly hostile relations between police and minority communities, particularly during riots.
Development of preventive policing strategies:
Kansas City Preventive Patrol Experiment assesses patrolling efficacy.
Rise of new policing strategies like Community Policing and COMPSTAT programming promotes accountability.
Wilson and Kelling's theory posits that:
Urban disorder leads to crimes; addressing minor offenses prevents larger issues.
High-profile incidents amplify scrutiny of police conduct:
Events such as the shootings of Michael Brown, Eric Garner, and George Floyd illustrate systemic issues leading to national protests.
Revival of community policing initiatives focuses on partnership with communities:
Encourages citizen involvement in crime reporting and information sharing.
Procedural justice policing emphasizes respectful treatment to improve public trust and legitimacy of police.