Relationship between colonialism and gender
Intersects with ecology, economics, government relations, spirituality, and everyday practices.
Impacts how societies care for or destroy the environment.
Rereading of modern capitalist colonialism as a lens for understanding gender.
Challenges the assumption that:
Heterosexuality is the natural and superior norm.
Highlights the interplay of gender, colonial history, and racial hierarchies.
Critique of universalizing women’s experiences:
Fails to recognize how colonialism shapes gendered oppression differently for women in the Global South.
Introduced by Lugones:
Exposes how European colonialism imposed a binary and patriarchal gender system.
Indigenous societies had more fluid and complex gender identities before colonization.
Description of the ideal human within colonial frameworks:
Depicted as the heterosexual Christian male.
Positioned as rational and superior, reinforcing racial and capitalist structures.
Gender roles:
Women were portrayed as:
Sexual purities, passive, and homebound.
Supportive of white European bourgeois norms.
Results in:
Gendered division that supports patriarchal order in Europe.
Justifies colonial dominance.
Overview of how colonization affected women:
Women were seen as:
Inferior and uncivilized.
Lacking rationality and autonomy.
Impacts of coloniality of gender:
Imposition of European gender norms on colonized societies.
Erasure of precolonial gender fluidity.
Reduction of non-European women to objects for racial and sexual exploitation.
Colonized individuals characterized as:
Sexually deviant, pestilent, and sinful.
Legitimization of:
Violence, control, and exclusion against colonized populations.
Complex categorizations of identities:
Terms like hermaphrodites, sodomites, viragos, and colomites used to label non-European identities as unnatural.
These labels reinforce colonial ideologies and practices.