Note 1: I (Bryan) tracked down the original source of the opening quote that is attributed to Rozin (2003). In doing so, I learned some context about this quote, and also something about specific words in the quote. In terms of context, this quote comes from the closing paragraph of an article about how to understand “cultural differences in relation to individual differences” (p. 273). Rozin was juxtaposing evolutionary approaches (which tend to consider how humans have evolved as a species) with cultural approaches (which tend to examine culture as a driving force in shaping how humans think, feel, and behave). From this perspective, Rozin (2003) was linking the perspectives, starting at a very broad level - a species level that all humans have in common - and then gradually depicting aspects of culture that have shaped who he is:
I am a Homo sapiens, I am an American, I am a male, and I am upper middle class. I live in the world created by Americans, with its fast food, rapid access to Internet, cell phones. It is hard to believe that each of these attributes and influences do not contribute substantially to how I think, how I feel, and how I behave. (p. 281).
And thus, each of us could generate our own description of contexts within which we have developed.
\
Note 2: Notice that the authors cite Google Scholar and a unique search they could do – we will attempt to replicate this in lab.
\
Note 3: The authors make reference toward the end of the Chapter to “Multi-level modeling and latent-class techniques”. These are fairly sophisticated statistical analyses that are being used in this field. You do not need to know what they are for the purposes of this reading/prompt set.
\
The authors put forth the notion that culture is not deterministic, but rather interactive and probabilistic. What does this mean? Try to respond in a way that is specific to human behavior…what does it mean that culture is interactive and probabilistic in explaining human behavior?
The authors give an overview of 6 “notes” regarding “factors that led to” a resurgence in research regarding cultural influences on personality. They also add a 7th. List these seven ideas, and ask yourself if you understand each one. (If not, bring that as a question to class!)
Refinement of the concept of personality and its ability to predict behavior across situations
Acceptance of the five-factor model (FFM) as an adequate taxonomy to organize personality differences
Emergence of individualism and collectivism (I-C) as dimension that may link ecology, culture, and personality
The multicultural movement in the United States
Refinement of statistical methodology to address cross-cultural conceptual linguistic, and measurement equivalence issues
Internationalization of scientific activity which makes cross-cultural collaboration easier
The internet has made it easier to conduct large-scale cross-national studies
Describe the cultural psychology approach, as well as the cross-cultural approach.
Fill in either Etic or Emic in the appropriate place:
Cultural psychology reflects an EMIC view
Cross cultural psychology reflects an ETIC view
In your own words, explain why the authors view culture as critical to the understanding of human personality.
Name and describe the 5 methodological developments of recent years over the past 10-14 years.
In terms of traits, what conclusions have been drawn from cross-cultural research, and what conclusions have been drawn from cultural research?
Look back to your answer to #6, and then consider: Where can personality be found? (Where is it seen, observed?)
Deterministic vs. Probabilistic
Deterministic: idea that something will 100% happen
Probabilistic: idea that something may happen
</p>
\