Module 3 Packet GE 2: Readings in Philippine History – Historical Revisionism, Martial Law, and EDSA Revolution (Weeks 6 & 7)
ACTIVITY 4: LECTURE-DISCUSSION ON HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Key concepts:
Historical Revisionism (Lesson 1): Reinterpreting past events or presenting new narratives based on newly discovered facts; reconstructing the past to update knowledge; adheres to academic research norms: establish facts, corroborate viewpoints, produce impartial interpretations. Source: Guiang (2022).
Legitimate revisionism: Re-examination of existing historical knowledge with careful methodology; occurs when new perspectives and evidence come to light. Source: Candelaria, Alporha & Kunting (2021).
Illegitimate revisionism / historical negationism: Reinterpretation carried out with harmful intent to spread misinformation, defame, or promote a specific agenda. Described as historical distortion by Prof. Xiao in the referenced video.
Quotations to note:
CJ Sereno: historical denialism is not a mere alternative reading of reality; it is a reading of an alternative reality that denies history as it happened.
ACTIVITY 7: LECTURE-DISCUSSION (2 HOURS) — LESSON 2: MARTIAL LAW
Core questions:
1) What is Martial Law?
2) Was the enactment of Martial Law justified?
3) What are the issues in connection with Martial Law?
Key concept: Martial Law involves the substitution of civilian authority with military authority. It can include:
Curfews
Use of military tribunals to judge civilians
Suspension of the right to habeas corpus (protects individuals from unlawful imprisonment). Note: habeas corpus is suspended during crises to expedite legal processes.
Marcos’s stated reasons for declaring Martial Law:
Claimed national security threat due to the resurgence of the Communist Party of the Philippines (CPP) in 1968.
Growing support for the CPP’s military wing, the New People’s Army (NPA), especially in Tarlac and other areas.
An assassination attempt on then Minister of Defense Juan Ponce Enrile provided a justification for the declaration, which occurred the day after the incident.
Declared a state of insurgency in Mindanao due to conflicts between Muslims and Christians, seen as a threat to national security.
Context about Mindanao: Muslims were fighting to protect ancestral lands from Christian migrants; the Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF) was formed in Malaysia and campaigned for autonomy of Mindanao from the national government. (Source cited in module: philippine-history.org)
Note on completeness: The transcript ends mid-sentence regarding the MNLF, indicating the source text is truncated at that point.
LESSON 3: EDSA REVOLUTION
The EDSA People Power Revolution occurred on February 25, 1986. It was a bloodless uprising that demonstrated the power of democracy and the people’s ability to force political change through demonstrations and prayer.
Significance: It led to the ousting of a dictator and served as a powerful example of collective action and democratic transition in Philippine history.
Cited reflections: Garcia (2018) notes the revolution’s importance and its demonstration of nonviolent mass mobilization.