UNIT 2- INTERACTIONS AMOUNG THE BRANCHES
CONGRESS
what are the 5 things congress does
-appropriate money- power of the purse
-make laws
-impeach and remove officials
-approve appointments- senate
the house
-initiates revenue bills
-brings charges if impeachment against the president and all civil officers
-chooses the president when the electoral college does not- no majority
the senate
-ratifies treaties negotiated by the president- 2/3
-possesses the sole power to try or judge impeachment cases
-confirms judicial appointments
-confirms executive appointments
determining apportionment of the house
-census- every 10 years
-reapportionment- divide the 435 seats between the states- every state gets one and the rest are distributed by population
redistricting
-the states draw the new lines for districts
-lines must be equal in population and contiguous
gerrymandering- strategic redistrciting to benefit a group- political party, incumbent, racial gerrymandering
INCUMBENCY
incumbents win elections
-90% of house incumbents win reelection
-75% of senate incumbents win reelection
why do they win?
-raise more money
-visibility- ppl know who they are and their record- have been seen more than others
-they serve constituents with casework and pork barrel
-franking privilege- ability to send mail by their signature rather than postage
-gerrymandered safe districts
consequences of the incumbency advantage
-leadership positions are not often transferred to new ppl
-too close of ties w interest groups and big money
-no incentive to fix flawed campaign laws bc incumbents benefit
the majority party has the advantage of…
-holds committee chairs
-chooses the speaker of the house
-assigns bills to committees
-holds the majority on each committee
-controls the house rules committee
-it sets the legislative agenda
the house is much more formal that the senate
-the senate has the filibuster- the house is limited on debate
-germaneness rule in the house- all amendments to bills must be relevant
-house has a rules committee to create formal rules for hearing bills
committees
-joint- both houses of congress. debate and report on matters concerning the congress rather than issues of public policy
-standing- permanently established legislative committees that consider and are responsible fore legislation within a certain subject area
-conference- temporary, house and senate, reconciling differences in legislation that has passed both chambers. usually convened to resolve bicameral differences on major or controversial legislation
house rules committee
-makes the rules
-they vote as a committee on every single bill in the house
house ways and means committee
-jurisdiction on all taxation, tariffs, and revenue
-members cannot serve on other committees
know the bill passage system
-bill is discussed in a senate committee
-reported to the senate floor to be voted on
-senators vote by voice
-if there is a majority, the bill passes in the US senate and is ready to go to the president
delegate model- members of congress cast votes that reflect the preferences of the majority of their constituents
trustee model- members of congress use their best judgment to make policy in the interest of the ppl
oversight
-congress watching over the bureaucracy
-senate has special oversight by confirming cabinet heads and presidential appointments
types of oversight
-setting guidelines for new agencies
-holding hearings and conducting investigations
-using budget control
-reorganizing an agency
-evaluating an agency’s programs
understanding the relationships between congress, the president, the bureaucracy, the courts, interest groups, and the ppl is imperative
HOW YOUR CONGRESSPERSON VOTES
trustee model- attitudinal view
-decisions made by elected official using their own personal views
-decisions made by the elected official based on the public good and not on the basis of constituents’ views
why use the trustee model?
-information access
-reliance on expertise
-divided constituency
-importance of issue
-vote his or her conscience
-difficulty determining what voters want
delegate model- representational view
-decision made by the elected official mirror the constituents’ views, represent constituents’ views, or do what voters tell them to do
why use the delegate model
-popular issue to voters
-controversial issue for voters
-close to election time
-involved in competitive election
-shares beliefs w majority of constituents
politico model- combo of the first 2- sometimes trustee and sometimes delegate
REDISTRICTING COURT CASES
baker v Carr 1961
constitutional question- can the court rule on redistricting issues?
opinion/ decision- yes, the court can make decisions on constitutional issues dealing w redistricting
significance
-groups can now go to the court to question the constitutionality of redistricting lines
-the concept of “one person, one vote” was created in this case. establishing that districts must be equal in population
impact- the court (fed gov) now has a check on the states over redistricting. states has to consider the constitutionality of the maps they create and determine if the court will uphold the maps they draw on constitutional grounds
applicable constitutional clauses/ parts
-14th amendment’s equal protection clause
-why?- all ppl in the US must be equally protected under the law. since the districts had vastly different populations, everyone was not equal under the law
shaw v reno- 1993
constitutional question- can a state draw districts solely based on race? (regardless of intention or benefit to minority representation)
opinion/ decision- no, a stare cannot draw a district solely based on race. the unusual district, while perhaps created by noble intentions, seemed to exceed what was reasonably necessary to avoid racial imbalanced in representation
significance- districts cannot be draw solely based on race regardless of intention
impact
- map drawers can consider race in the disgn of districts
-they can draw districts to create minority representation
-however, districts cannot be solely drawn by race
-creases an additional consideration when drawing maps and an additional potential challenge to maps that can be adjudicated by the court
applicable constitutional clauses/ parts
-14th amendment’s equal protection clause
-why?- citizens were not being equally drawn into districts in a racially neutral way
THE PRESIDENT
THE PRESIDENT 1
the electoral college
-picks the president by winner take all w states getting electoral votes
-the house pick the president if one person does not get a majority of electoral votes
executive office of the president- White House staff
-includes key presidential aids
-the press secretary and White House chief of staff
-can be appointed and dismissed without senate approval
-works w the president on policy implementation
-more involve w recent policy
office of management and budget- assists the president in overseeing the preparation of the federal budget
national security council NCS- the principal foreign policy and military advisers
PRESIDENT 2
president’s relationship w congress
president needs senate approval of cabinet members, judges, important positions like ambassadors and bureaucratic chairs
congress can impeach
congress can override presidential vetoes
congress has oversight power of the bureaucracy and executive agencies
president can issue executive orders to sidestep congress
president has become more reliant on White House staff to create policy
president proposes legislation but needs congress members to help introduce
president creates a budget but congress must approve
president is commander in chief but congress declares war
PRESIDENT 3
war powers resolution
president is commander in chief and can deploy troops
congress passed the WPR by a presidential veto
provisions
-”whenever possible” -president must consult w congress BEFORE sending in armed forces
-consult w congress regularly while force are in action
-president must remove troops after 60 days w an additional 30 days to withdraw troops if congress has not declared war or given authorization to proceed
congress does not enforce the WPR (generally)
congress approves the use of military force usually
all presidents have claimed the WPR is unconstitutional
the supreme court has not ruled on the WPR
PRESIDENT 4- POWERS
formal powers
commander in chief
appoints all ambassadors
negotiates treaties- subject to senate ratification- 2/3
president recognizes nations
receives ambassadors and other public ministers
can grant pardons and reprieves
informal powers
negotiate executive agreements w other nations
has executive privilege
can issue executive orders
can use a signing statement
bully pulpit- a public office or position of authority that provides its occupant w an outstanding opportunity to speak out on any issue
ROLES OF THE PRESIDENT
commander in chief- leader of the military
chief legislator- participant in crating legislation
chief diplomat- works w foreign nations
head of state- face of the nation
chief executive- enforcer of laws
chief administrator- leader of bureaucratic agencies
party chief- face of their party
chief citizen- representative of the ppl
crisis manager- deals w unforeseen emergencies
economic planner- creates the nation’s budget
THE JUDICIARY
courts
consti only mentions Supreme Court
-congress has power to create all other federal courts
appeals process- the losing part in a decision by a trial court in the federal system normally is entitled to appeal the decision to a federal court of appeals. similarly, a litigant who is not satisfied w a decision made by a federal administrative agency usually may file a petition for review of the agency decision by a court of appeals
the SC is the last court of appeals
writ of certiorari
-the order by the SC directing a lower court to send up the record in a case for review
-granting certiorari- courts deciding to hear the case
[[rule of 4 [[
-in order to grant certiorari 4 out of 9 SC justices have to agree to hear the case
-this is an unwritten rule
-opinions- present the issues, establish precedents, and set guidelines for lower courts
-majority opinion- the formal written decision by the court’s majority on a particular case (the senior justices determines who writes the opinion)
-concurring opinion- supports the majority opinion but stresses different constitutional or legal reasons for reaching the judgment (written by a justice that votes in the majority but differs slightly from the writer of the majority opinion)
-dissenting opinion- expresses a POV that disagrees w the majority opinion. have no legal standing. written by a justice in the majority to show their dissatisfaction and constitutional issues w the majority
precedent/ stare decisis
-courts decisions are the guidelines for future cases
-majority of court decisions are based on precedents established in earlier cases
-precedents are occasionally overturned like in brown v board of ed
judicial restraint
-the SC should use precedent and the framers original intent to decide cases
-court should most often defer to the elected institution of gov
judicial activism
-court should correct injustices when other branches of gov or the states refuse to do so
-court should be proactive in deciding cases (deciding based on current beliefs)
court insulation
the court does not face direct public pressure
-court picks own agenda
-judges are appointed to life terms
COURT CASE VOCAB
constitutional question- what is the court looking at? does this violate the constitution or not?
opinion
-the decision made by the court (will often be split bc these cases are controversial).
-this is a written opinion by a member of the majority
-holds the weight of law
dissent- a written opinion by the losing side in the decision
concurrence- a written opinion by a justice in the majority by they agree for slightly different reasons from the author of the majority opinion
[[significance [[
-a statement of why this case is a required case
-why is the decision important for gov in general
impact
-how will the decision change the way gov functions
-think about what can now happen bc of the decision
BUREAUCRACY AND PUBLIC POLICY
BUREAUCRACY
large and complex organization of appointed and hired officials
features of bureaucracy
-hierarchical authority
-job specialization
-formal rules
-hired and promoted through the merit system
federal and state bureaucracy has grown dramatically
15 cabinet departments of the executive branch
-cabinet secretaries have close ties to their departments that the president
-the president is still in charge of the departments
INDEPENDENT REGULATORY AGENCIES
SEC, FCC, FEC, are all common regulatory agencies
regulatory agencies are led by small commissions appointed by the president and confirmed by the senate
the commissioners cannot be removed by the president during their team
federal reserve board is an important independent agency
-sets monetary policy (the rules concerning the flow of money- interest rates)
-the FED has a lot of independence and can develop monetary policy with our interference from interest groups, politicians, and political parties
-fiscal policy- taxing and spending
-monetary policy- money supply and interest rates
gov corporations
-designed to function as a for profit company
-USPS and AMTRAK are the best EXs
executive agency- non cabinet and non regulatory agencies- EPA, NASA, and GSA
RELATIONSHIP W THE PRESIDENT AND CONGRESS
president appoints senior agency heads and subheads
senate has the power to approve appointments
president can issue an executive order that the bureaucracy must follow
president can reduce or increase the budget of an agency (can ask)
congress can pass budget increases or restrictions
congress has oversight over bureaucratic actions
-budget
-hearings and investigations
-setting new guidelines
congress can make new legislation
agencies are so large, complex, and specialized it is difficult for congress and the preside to “watch” the agencies creating bureaucratic discretion
relationship w the court
deem actions unconstitutional or constitutional
iron triangles
-bureaucratic agency, an interest group, and a congressional committee
-work together to benefit one another in policy making
issue networks- include a wide range of ppl from media to congressional staff and policy experts
red tape- excessive regulation on rigid conformity to federal rules that is considered redundant or bureaucratic and hinders or prevents action or decision making
bureaucratic discretion
-bureaucrats have the ability to shape implementation of public policy
-make, enforce, and adjudicate policy relating to their policy arena
a complaint about bureaucracy- bureaucratic agencies often fulfill the role of all three branches of gov (this is a potential problem bc they are unelected and not beholden to the ppl)
-quasi legislative- make their own bureaucratic regulations
-quasi executive- they enforce the rules- can fine ppl
-quasi judicial- can adjudicate issues dealing w their area of expertise
PUBLIC POLICY 1- GENERAL
policy
-differs from rules or law
-whole law can compel or prohibit behaviors (a law requiting the payment of taxes on income), policy merely guides actions toward those that are most likely to achieve a desired outcome
policy making- the creation, by gov, of guidelines designed to protect and improve the country for its citizens
PUBLIC POLICY 2- ECONOMIC POLICY
the fed (federal reserve system)- makes monetary policy by regulating lending practices of banks thus regulating the supply money
monetary policy- the manipulation of supply of money (regulations with increase of decrease the amount of money in circulation)
fiscal policy- the regulations associated w the federal budget (taxing, spending, and borrowing)
-determined by congress and the president
PUBLIC POLICY 3- SOCIAL WELFARE POLICY
entitlement programs- benefits that certain qualified individuals are entitled by law, regardless of need (not controversial)
-ppl pay into entitlement programs and get money later
-social security and medicare
-do not gave to be poor and being rich does not qualify
means tested programs- programs available only to individuals under the poverty line (controversial)
-medicaid- medial hospital aid
-food stamps- coupons that can be used to buy food
-TANF (temporary assistance for needy families)- payment
taxation
progressive tax- a tax by which the gov takes a greater share of the income of the rich than the poor (30% rich/ 5% poor)
-US uses a type of this
proportional tax- gov takes the same share of income from everyone (20% from all)
regressive tax- the opposite of progressive tax
PUBLIC POLICY 4- HEALTHCARE POLICY
gov and the American ppl spend A LOT on healthcare (many times more than western countries)
health insurance- Americans (60%) buy insurance through their employer
medicare- gov funded (partially) insurance for older Americans
medicaid- gov funded insurance for poor Americans
gov (national, state, local) pays for 46% of the US “health bill”
-other countries 77%
-Americans are told/ believe we have a private healthcare system
-reality- we have a split system which is largely ineffective
PUBLIC POLICY 5- ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY
EPA- agency charged w administering all of the gov’s environmental policies. federal independent executive agency that regulates the environment
clean air act of 1970- law that shared the department of transportation w the responsibility to reduce automobile emissions
water pollution control act of 1972- a law that intended to clean lakes and rivers. it required industries, municipalities, and other polluters to pollute less
gov creates policy to protect waterways, endangered species, farmland, the air, and to reduce pollution in general. -created to help ppl then other reasons
PUBLIC POLICY 6- NATIONAL SECURITY
foreign policy- laws, regulations, and decisions made that impact the rest of the world
3 instruments of foreign policy
-military- the threat of war
-economic- the threat of economic sanctions or the positive of economic relations
-diplomacy- policies, economically and otherwise, use to improve relations
[[policy makers [[
-the president- main policymaker as the chief diplomat/ commander in chief (president has most contact w rest of the world)
-diplomats- those selected to work w foreign Govs
-the national security establishment- the CIA, joint chiefs of staff, secretary of defense, NSA, and FBI are all involved in the protection of the country
-congress- has the power of oversight and appropriation of funds
CONGRESS
what are the 5 things congress does
-appropriate money- power of the purse
-make laws
-impeach and remove officials
-approve appointments- senate
the house
-initiates revenue bills
-brings charges if impeachment against the president and all civil officers
-chooses the president when the electoral college does not- no majority
the senate
-ratifies treaties negotiated by the president- 2/3
-possesses the sole power to try or judge impeachment cases
-confirms judicial appointments
-confirms executive appointments
determining apportionment of the house
-census- every 10 years
-reapportionment- divide the 435 seats between the states- every state gets one and the rest are distributed by population
redistricting
-the states draw the new lines for districts
-lines must be equal in population and contiguous
gerrymandering- strategic redistrciting to benefit a group- political party, incumbent, racial gerrymandering
INCUMBENCY
incumbents win elections
-90% of house incumbents win reelection
-75% of senate incumbents win reelection
why do they win?
-raise more money
-visibility- ppl know who they are and their record- have been seen more than others
-they serve constituents with casework and pork barrel
-franking privilege- ability to send mail by their signature rather than postage
-gerrymandered safe districts
consequences of the incumbency advantage
-leadership positions are not often transferred to new ppl
-too close of ties w interest groups and big money
-no incentive to fix flawed campaign laws bc incumbents benefit
the majority party has the advantage of…
-holds committee chairs
-chooses the speaker of the house
-assigns bills to committees
-holds the majority on each committee
-controls the house rules committee
-it sets the legislative agenda
the house is much more formal that the senate
-the senate has the filibuster- the house is limited on debate
-germaneness rule in the house- all amendments to bills must be relevant
-house has a rules committee to create formal rules for hearing bills
committees
-joint- both houses of congress. debate and report on matters concerning the congress rather than issues of public policy
-standing- permanently established legislative committees that consider and are responsible fore legislation within a certain subject area
-conference- temporary, house and senate, reconciling differences in legislation that has passed both chambers. usually convened to resolve bicameral differences on major or controversial legislation
house rules committee
-makes the rules
-they vote as a committee on every single bill in the house
house ways and means committee
-jurisdiction on all taxation, tariffs, and revenue
-members cannot serve on other committees
know the bill passage system
-bill is discussed in a senate committee
-reported to the senate floor to be voted on
-senators vote by voice
-if there is a majority, the bill passes in the US senate and is ready to go to the president
delegate model- members of congress cast votes that reflect the preferences of the majority of their constituents
trustee model- members of congress use their best judgment to make policy in the interest of the ppl
oversight
-congress watching over the bureaucracy
-senate has special oversight by confirming cabinet heads and presidential appointments
types of oversight
-setting guidelines for new agencies
-holding hearings and conducting investigations
-using budget control
-reorganizing an agency
-evaluating an agency’s programs
understanding the relationships between congress, the president, the bureaucracy, the courts, interest groups, and the ppl is imperative
HOW YOUR CONGRESSPERSON VOTES
trustee model- attitudinal view
-decisions made by elected official using their own personal views
-decisions made by the elected official based on the public good and not on the basis of constituents’ views
why use the trustee model?
-information access
-reliance on expertise
-divided constituency
-importance of issue
-vote his or her conscience
-difficulty determining what voters want
delegate model- representational view
-decision made by the elected official mirror the constituents’ views, represent constituents’ views, or do what voters tell them to do
why use the delegate model
-popular issue to voters
-controversial issue for voters
-close to election time
-involved in competitive election
-shares beliefs w majority of constituents
politico model- combo of the first 2- sometimes trustee and sometimes delegate
REDISTRICTING COURT CASES
baker v Carr 1961
constitutional question- can the court rule on redistricting issues?
opinion/ decision- yes, the court can make decisions on constitutional issues dealing w redistricting
significance
-groups can now go to the court to question the constitutionality of redistricting lines
-the concept of “one person, one vote” was created in this case. establishing that districts must be equal in population
impact- the court (fed gov) now has a check on the states over redistricting. states has to consider the constitutionality of the maps they create and determine if the court will uphold the maps they draw on constitutional grounds
applicable constitutional clauses/ parts
-14th amendment’s equal protection clause
-why?- all ppl in the US must be equally protected under the law. since the districts had vastly different populations, everyone was not equal under the law
shaw v reno- 1993
constitutional question- can a state draw districts solely based on race? (regardless of intention or benefit to minority representation)
opinion/ decision- no, a stare cannot draw a district solely based on race. the unusual district, while perhaps created by noble intentions, seemed to exceed what was reasonably necessary to avoid racial imbalanced in representation
significance- districts cannot be draw solely based on race regardless of intention
impact
- map drawers can consider race in the disgn of districts
-they can draw districts to create minority representation
-however, districts cannot be solely drawn by race
-creases an additional consideration when drawing maps and an additional potential challenge to maps that can be adjudicated by the court
applicable constitutional clauses/ parts
-14th amendment’s equal protection clause
-why?- citizens were not being equally drawn into districts in a racially neutral way
THE PRESIDENT
THE PRESIDENT 1
the electoral college
-picks the president by winner take all w states getting electoral votes
-the house pick the president if one person does not get a majority of electoral votes
executive office of the president- White House staff
-includes key presidential aids
-the press secretary and White House chief of staff
-can be appointed and dismissed without senate approval
-works w the president on policy implementation
-more involve w recent policy
office of management and budget- assists the president in overseeing the preparation of the federal budget
national security council NCS- the principal foreign policy and military advisers
PRESIDENT 2
president’s relationship w congress
president needs senate approval of cabinet members, judges, important positions like ambassadors and bureaucratic chairs
congress can impeach
congress can override presidential vetoes
congress has oversight power of the bureaucracy and executive agencies
president can issue executive orders to sidestep congress
president has become more reliant on White House staff to create policy
president proposes legislation but needs congress members to help introduce
president creates a budget but congress must approve
president is commander in chief but congress declares war
PRESIDENT 3
war powers resolution
president is commander in chief and can deploy troops
congress passed the WPR by a presidential veto
provisions
-”whenever possible” -president must consult w congress BEFORE sending in armed forces
-consult w congress regularly while force are in action
-president must remove troops after 60 days w an additional 30 days to withdraw troops if congress has not declared war or given authorization to proceed
congress does not enforce the WPR (generally)
congress approves the use of military force usually
all presidents have claimed the WPR is unconstitutional
the supreme court has not ruled on the WPR
PRESIDENT 4- POWERS
formal powers
commander in chief
appoints all ambassadors
negotiates treaties- subject to senate ratification- 2/3
president recognizes nations
receives ambassadors and other public ministers
can grant pardons and reprieves
informal powers
negotiate executive agreements w other nations
has executive privilege
can issue executive orders
can use a signing statement
bully pulpit- a public office or position of authority that provides its occupant w an outstanding opportunity to speak out on any issue
ROLES OF THE PRESIDENT
commander in chief- leader of the military
chief legislator- participant in crating legislation
chief diplomat- works w foreign nations
head of state- face of the nation
chief executive- enforcer of laws
chief administrator- leader of bureaucratic agencies
party chief- face of their party
chief citizen- representative of the ppl
crisis manager- deals w unforeseen emergencies
economic planner- creates the nation’s budget
THE JUDICIARY
courts
consti only mentions Supreme Court
-congress has power to create all other federal courts
appeals process- the losing part in a decision by a trial court in the federal system normally is entitled to appeal the decision to a federal court of appeals. similarly, a litigant who is not satisfied w a decision made by a federal administrative agency usually may file a petition for review of the agency decision by a court of appeals
the SC is the last court of appeals
writ of certiorari
-the order by the SC directing a lower court to send up the record in a case for review
-granting certiorari- courts deciding to hear the case
[[rule of 4 [[
-in order to grant certiorari 4 out of 9 SC justices have to agree to hear the case
-this is an unwritten rule
-opinions- present the issues, establish precedents, and set guidelines for lower courts
-majority opinion- the formal written decision by the court’s majority on a particular case (the senior justices determines who writes the opinion)
-concurring opinion- supports the majority opinion but stresses different constitutional or legal reasons for reaching the judgment (written by a justice that votes in the majority but differs slightly from the writer of the majority opinion)
-dissenting opinion- expresses a POV that disagrees w the majority opinion. have no legal standing. written by a justice in the majority to show their dissatisfaction and constitutional issues w the majority
precedent/ stare decisis
-courts decisions are the guidelines for future cases
-majority of court decisions are based on precedents established in earlier cases
-precedents are occasionally overturned like in brown v board of ed
judicial restraint
-the SC should use precedent and the framers original intent to decide cases
-court should most often defer to the elected institution of gov
judicial activism
-court should correct injustices when other branches of gov or the states refuse to do so
-court should be proactive in deciding cases (deciding based on current beliefs)
court insulation
the court does not face direct public pressure
-court picks own agenda
-judges are appointed to life terms
COURT CASE VOCAB
constitutional question- what is the court looking at? does this violate the constitution or not?
opinion
-the decision made by the court (will often be split bc these cases are controversial).
-this is a written opinion by a member of the majority
-holds the weight of law
dissent- a written opinion by the losing side in the decision
concurrence- a written opinion by a justice in the majority by they agree for slightly different reasons from the author of the majority opinion
[[significance [[
-a statement of why this case is a required case
-why is the decision important for gov in general
impact
-how will the decision change the way gov functions
-think about what can now happen bc of the decision
BUREAUCRACY AND PUBLIC POLICY
BUREAUCRACY
large and complex organization of appointed and hired officials
features of bureaucracy
-hierarchical authority
-job specialization
-formal rules
-hired and promoted through the merit system
federal and state bureaucracy has grown dramatically
15 cabinet departments of the executive branch
-cabinet secretaries have close ties to their departments that the president
-the president is still in charge of the departments
INDEPENDENT REGULATORY AGENCIES
SEC, FCC, FEC, are all common regulatory agencies
regulatory agencies are led by small commissions appointed by the president and confirmed by the senate
the commissioners cannot be removed by the president during their team
federal reserve board is an important independent agency
-sets monetary policy (the rules concerning the flow of money- interest rates)
-the FED has a lot of independence and can develop monetary policy with our interference from interest groups, politicians, and political parties
-fiscal policy- taxing and spending
-monetary policy- money supply and interest rates
gov corporations
-designed to function as a for profit company
-USPS and AMTRAK are the best EXs
executive agency- non cabinet and non regulatory agencies- EPA, NASA, and GSA
RELATIONSHIP W THE PRESIDENT AND CONGRESS
president appoints senior agency heads and subheads
senate has the power to approve appointments
president can issue an executive order that the bureaucracy must follow
president can reduce or increase the budget of an agency (can ask)
congress can pass budget increases or restrictions
congress has oversight over bureaucratic actions
-budget
-hearings and investigations
-setting new guidelines
congress can make new legislation
agencies are so large, complex, and specialized it is difficult for congress and the preside to “watch” the agencies creating bureaucratic discretion
relationship w the court
deem actions unconstitutional or constitutional
iron triangles
-bureaucratic agency, an interest group, and a congressional committee
-work together to benefit one another in policy making
issue networks- include a wide range of ppl from media to congressional staff and policy experts
red tape- excessive regulation on rigid conformity to federal rules that is considered redundant or bureaucratic and hinders or prevents action or decision making
bureaucratic discretion
-bureaucrats have the ability to shape implementation of public policy
-make, enforce, and adjudicate policy relating to their policy arena
a complaint about bureaucracy- bureaucratic agencies often fulfill the role of all three branches of gov (this is a potential problem bc they are unelected and not beholden to the ppl)
-quasi legislative- make their own bureaucratic regulations
-quasi executive- they enforce the rules- can fine ppl
-quasi judicial- can adjudicate issues dealing w their area of expertise
PUBLIC POLICY 1- GENERAL
policy
-differs from rules or law
-whole law can compel or prohibit behaviors (a law requiting the payment of taxes on income), policy merely guides actions toward those that are most likely to achieve a desired outcome
policy making- the creation, by gov, of guidelines designed to protect and improve the country for its citizens
PUBLIC POLICY 2- ECONOMIC POLICY
the fed (federal reserve system)- makes monetary policy by regulating lending practices of banks thus regulating the supply money
monetary policy- the manipulation of supply of money (regulations with increase of decrease the amount of money in circulation)
fiscal policy- the regulations associated w the federal budget (taxing, spending, and borrowing)
-determined by congress and the president
PUBLIC POLICY 3- SOCIAL WELFARE POLICY
entitlement programs- benefits that certain qualified individuals are entitled by law, regardless of need (not controversial)
-ppl pay into entitlement programs and get money later
-social security and medicare
-do not gave to be poor and being rich does not qualify
means tested programs- programs available only to individuals under the poverty line (controversial)
-medicaid- medial hospital aid
-food stamps- coupons that can be used to buy food
-TANF (temporary assistance for needy families)- payment
taxation
progressive tax- a tax by which the gov takes a greater share of the income of the rich than the poor (30% rich/ 5% poor)
-US uses a type of this
proportional tax- gov takes the same share of income from everyone (20% from all)
regressive tax- the opposite of progressive tax
PUBLIC POLICY 4- HEALTHCARE POLICY
gov and the American ppl spend A LOT on healthcare (many times more than western countries)
health insurance- Americans (60%) buy insurance through their employer
medicare- gov funded (partially) insurance for older Americans
medicaid- gov funded insurance for poor Americans
gov (national, state, local) pays for 46% of the US “health bill”
-other countries 77%
-Americans are told/ believe we have a private healthcare system
-reality- we have a split system which is largely ineffective
PUBLIC POLICY 5- ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY
EPA- agency charged w administering all of the gov’s environmental policies. federal independent executive agency that regulates the environment
clean air act of 1970- law that shared the department of transportation w the responsibility to reduce automobile emissions
water pollution control act of 1972- a law that intended to clean lakes and rivers. it required industries, municipalities, and other polluters to pollute less
gov creates policy to protect waterways, endangered species, farmland, the air, and to reduce pollution in general. -created to help ppl then other reasons
PUBLIC POLICY 6- NATIONAL SECURITY
foreign policy- laws, regulations, and decisions made that impact the rest of the world
3 instruments of foreign policy
-military- the threat of war
-economic- the threat of economic sanctions or the positive of economic relations
-diplomacy- policies, economically and otherwise, use to improve relations
[[policy makers [[
-the president- main policymaker as the chief diplomat/ commander in chief (president has most contact w rest of the world)
-diplomats- those selected to work w foreign Govs
-the national security establishment- the CIA, joint chiefs of staff, secretary of defense, NSA, and FBI are all involved in the protection of the country
-congress- has the power of oversight and appropriation of funds