Price ceiling
the government sets the maximum pric ethat can legally be charged or paid
in the US price ceilings are now used for rents. in the oast gasoline was subject to price ceiling
Price floor
the government sets the minimum pric ethat can be legally be charged or paid
in the US, price floors are now used for many agricultural products. the minimum wage is a price floor
you can charge any price until that line, all prices above are illegal
if its above the equilibrium price, t makes the equilibrium price illegally
this causes something to change
a shortage
increased search activity
an illicit market
this causes:
Black markets/ illicit market
markets in which an otehrwhise legal good trades at an illegale price
search
efforts to find something from whom to buy or sell from
set bellow equilibrium price = change
shortage
gov want to lower price and has to be set bellow the equilibrium price
under producing creates deadweight loss
imcant above the equilibrium price
surplus
Illegal hiring
some workers and firms will agree to lower wages lower than the minimum wage
search
as workers search for jobs, they are unemployed
makes equilibrium wage illegal so something has to change
marginal social benefit marginal social cost
Gain:
workers who keep their jobs and pay hier wages
loss:
all employers
workers who lose their jobs
perfectly inelastic demand- buyers pay
perfectly elastic demand- sellers pay
difference between supply curves is the tax (aka $1 in this example)
tax created dead weight loss
who actually pay the tax
the tax incidence depends on the price elasticity of demand and the price elasticity of supply
for a given price elasticity of supply
the larger the price elasticity of demand, the less of the tax the demanders pay
the smaller the price elasticity of the demand, the more of the tax the demanders pay
for a given price elasticity of demand
the lager the price elasticity of supply, the less of the taxt the suppliers pay
the smaller the price elasticity of supply, the more of the tax the suppliers pay
who ever has the lager elasticity pays less and vise versa
Perfect inelastic supply = sellers pay
perfect elastic supply= buyers pay
the benefits principle
people should pay taxes equal to the benefits they receive fro the services provided by the government
those who benefit most pay most
ability to pay principle
people should pay taxes according to how easily they can bear the burden of the tax
an upper limit to the quantity of a good that may be produced in a specified period
effects of the PW depends on where its set bellow or above the equilibrium quantity.
if above= nothing changes
if bello =
a decrease in supply
a rise in price
a decrease in marginal cost
inefficient underproduction
an incentive to cheat and over produce
a payment made by the giv to a producer
effects are similar to tax but the opposite directions
increase in supply
a fall in price and increase in quantity produced
an increase in marginal cost
payments by govt to farmers
inefficient overproduction
Definition: Markets for many goods and services are regulated; some goods are illegal to buy and sell (e.g., drugs like cocaine, ecstasy, heroin, methamphetamine, and in some states, marijuana).
Trade Dynamics: Despite their illegality, the trade in these drugs is a multibillion-dollar business. The economic models explaining trade in legal goods can also be applied to illegal goods.
Key Concepts:
Prices and Quantities: Analyze what market prices and quantities would look like if these goods were legal.
Prohibition Impact: Understanding how prohibition affects supply and demand.
Taxation's Role: Exploring how taxation can limit consumption of illegal goods.
A Free Market for a Drug:
Demand Curve (D): Lower drug prices lead to higher quantity demanded.
Supply Curve (S): Lower drug prices result in lower quantity supplied.
Equilibrium Price/Quantity: If drugs were legal, equilibrium would be at price Pc and quantity Qc.
Cost of Legality:
Cost of Breaking the Law: The illegal status raises the cost of trading, influenced by penalties and law enforcement.
Penalties on Sellers:
Drug dealers in the U.S. face severe penalties, including long jail terms and hefty fines.
Result: Decreased supply as the supply curve shifts left (S + CBL).
Penalties on Buyers:
Possessing illegal drugs can lead to serious penalties, impacting maximum buyer prices and demand.
Result: Demand decreases as the demand curve shifts left (D-CBL).
Penalties on Both Sellers and Buyers:
If penalties apply to both, supply and demand shift left, affecting market equilibrium.
Price remains at Pc; however, the quantity traded decreases to Qp.
Effects of Enforcement:
Higher penalties increase the decrease in demand and/or supply. Depending on who faces heavier penalties, either the price rises or falls compared to the competitive market.
Challenges in Enforcement:
High costs and resource limitations hinder effective law enforcement.
Result: It’s rare to decrease demand/supply to zero.
Debate on Legalization:
There are calls for legalizing and taxing drugs as a potential policy solution to the failures of prohibition policies