Normality versus abnormality
^^Approaches to defining abnormality^^
- Societies are always different and changeable. What is considered normal 10- years ago may be considered abnormal now, and vice versa
- Abnormality can be seen as a means of social control because society decided what behaviors are acceptable.
- Some patterns of behavior may be socially acceptable, but harmful to others
- ==Example:== Someone could think that there is nothing unacceptable about a person being afraid to walk out of their house. Whereas that person has the inability to leave the house due to irrational fears.
- Abnormality must be evaluated in the context
- ==Example:== The way you behave in school and the way you behave at a party would be different, but it is acceptable in the given context.
^^Abnormality as inadequate functionality^^
Rosenhan and Seligman have seven criteria that can establish abnormality:
- Suffering- subjective experience of one’s state as wrong
- Maladaptive- inability to achieve major life goals
- Example: inability to establish positive interpersonal relationships
- Unconventional behavior- behavior that stands out and differs substantially from that of most people
- Unpredictable/ loss of control- lack of consistency in actions
- Irrationality- others cannot understand why the person behaves in this way
- Observer discomfort- it makes other people uncomfortable to witness this behavior
- Violation of moral standards- behavior goes against the common moral norms established in the society
- Degrees of abnormality are based on how many of the criteria of abnormal behavior are met. They also argue that people can meet more than one criterion of abnormality.
^^Abnormality as a deviation from ideal mental health^^
Ideal mental health criteria were proposed by humanistic psychologists.
Humanistic psychologists are known for their belief that psychology should focus on positive aspects of human experiences (health, happiness, self-realization) rather than mental illness
Marie Jahoda identified six characteristics of ideal mental health:
- Efficient self-perception
- Realistic self-esteem
- Voluntary control of behavior
- Accurate perception of the world
- Positive relationships
- Self-direction and productivity
This approach means that mental health is defined positively, through what a person needs to achieve by embracing interpersonal relationships, self-perception, perception of the world, etc
A weakness of this approach: it may be hard to fully achieve all 6 parameters of mental health.
- Parameters are difficult to measure or quantify.
^^Abnormality as statistical infrequency^^
Statistical infrequency is used as a criterion of abnormality. This approach shows that a characteristic of behavior or trait of personality is classified as abnormal if it is statistically unusual
- A distribution graph is used:
- The “norms” of the threshold is 95%. If an individual is different from the 95% (score of less than 70 or more than 130), they are not statistically “normal”
- Falling in the 99% range can be classified as severely abnormal
Limitations to this approach:
- Statistical norms change
- Individuals outside of the statistical norm can be seen as desirable
- Example: People with higher IQs are outside the norm
Classification Systems
The classification widely used is the DSM (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual)
- The DSM is what clinicians use to arrive at a diagnosis by matching the individual's behavior with the symptoms
- There are DSM I-IV
\
Prevalence Rates and Disorders
^^Prevalence rates of major depressive disorder^^
The main parameters used to characterize the spread of a disorder are prevalence rate and onset age
- Point prevalence rate: proportion of people in the population currently diagnosed with the disorder
- Period prevalence: proportion of a population that has the same disorder at some time during a given period
- Onset age: the average age when individuals in a given population first develop the disorder
^^Factors influencing prevalence rate estimates^^
- Classification system
- Clinical biases in diagnosis
- Reluctancy to report mental health illness
Validity and reliability of diagnosis
^^Realiability and validity of diagnosis: the concepts^^
\
The role of clinical biases in diagnosis
^^Clinician variables in diagnosis^^
- Clinicians attitudes and beliefs
- Clinician’s abilities, such as perspective, self-reflection, tolerance for uncertainty, tolerance for difference
- Clinician’s cognitive biases
\
Explanation for disorders
^^The concept of etiology^^
Science purses 4 goals:description, explanation, prediction, and control.
- Description: achieved by classification systems
- Explanation: predict the course of disease and patient’s response to interventions
- Explanation opens door to prediction and control
^^Genetic heritability^^
- The falconer model
- Gene-environment interaction
- Gene-enviorment correlation
- Neurotransmitters
^^Cognitivative explanations^^
- Thoughts and beliefs as major cause of deppressive behavior
^^Sociocultural explanations^^
- Provoke depression in women:
- having 3 or more children under age of 14
- lack of intimate relationship
- lack of employment
- loss of mother before age of 11
\
Assessing the effectiveness of treatment
- Severity of the disorder
- Treatment outcomes
- Measuring the therapy outcome
- exact mechanism of change
Placebo effect
Approaches to assessing the effectiveness of treatment
- Randomized control trials
- Qualitative research studies
- Meta-annalyses
\
Biological treatment of depression
- Antidepressants
- Selective seotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs)
\