Authoritarian Parenting and Conduct Disorder:
Finding: A statistically significant cross-lagged correlation (r = .31, p < .05) suggests that authoritarian parenting style predicts conduct disorder, supporting the researcher's hypothesis.
Implication: This indicates that the parenting style influences the children's behavior rather than the reverse.
Stability of Conduct Disorder:
Evidence: Positive autocorrelation at Time 1 and Time 2 (r = .29, p < .05) shows that conduct disorder symptoms persist over time, indicating stability.
Causality:
Claim: The researcher cannot claim causation; while cross-lagged correlations support temporal precedence, other variables might influence the relationship (third variable problem).
Reasoning: Correlational designs lack internal validity, which is crucial for causal claims.
Internal Validity:
Definition: The extent to which a study can show a cause-effect relationship without confounding factors.
Note: Correlational studies cannot establish causation due to potential unmeasured variables.
Causality Criteria:
Purpose: To control for third variables and examine direct relationships between primary variables.
Example: Examining the relationship between physical health, relationship satisfaction, and financial security.
Interpretation: Findings indicate whether a significant relationship remains after accounting for other factors.
Moderation: Tests if the strength/direction of a relationship changes based on another variable.
Example: The effect of studying on exam performance may depend on study types (e.g., practicing retrieval vs. reviewing notes).
Mediation: Explores the mechanism through which one variable influences another.
Steps: