The integration of maker activities in classrooms enhances equitable participation in learning.
Teachers need adequate preparation with knowledge and skills for effective incorporation of maker technologies.
This study compares learning outcomes in science when using maker technology versus standard curriculum in 9th-grade classes.
Results indicate better learning outcomes through maker technology instruction.
Maker Movement: Focuses on hands-on, interest-driven STEM learning, typically outside of school settings (museums, libraries).
Challenges: Critics argue it promotes narrow scopes and reinforces stereotypes about who engages in STEM fields.
Access Barriers: Limited resources (knowledge, transportation) restrict participation in making activities, necessitating classroom integration of maker education.
Standard-aligned projects and curriculum are crucial for effective maker integration in schools.
Classroom-based making offers equitable STEM participation for all students.
Limited research exists on the impact of making in classroom environments.
Learning through Making: Emphasizes creating artifacts that bridge physical and digital aspects of learning.
Effective in K-12 education as it aligns with multiple standards (NGSS) including computational thinking.
Distinction between Project-Based Learning (PBL) and making; making often provides a sense of permanence to learners.
E-textiles as a specific form of making has been shown to enhance understanding of complex scientific concepts (e.g., energy transfer, circuitry).
Promotes students’ interest and engagement with science content, increasing content knowledge and mastery.
Affords students opportunities for creativity and autonomy in learning.
E-textiles help students adopt new STEM identities and relate computing more personally to their lives.
Examines the impact of e-textiles and making projects on students' learning outcomes compared to standard instruction.
Investigates teacher perceptions regarding instruction with maker technologies.
Hypothesis: Students engaging in making activities will show greater pre-post gains in learning assessments.
Mixed Methods: Combines quantitative (quasi-experimental research) and qualitative (interviews with teachers) approaches to provide comprehensive analysis.
219 ninth-grade students from American Western Educational School (AWES).
Students divided into standard instruction (123 students) and e-textiles (96 students).
E-textiles Curriculum: Students create artifacts using conductive materials and programming, combining creativity with scientific rigor.
Standard classroom curriculum compared with no instructional design by the participating teacher, Ms. Adams.
Two-stage PD: Initial training on content and specific maker projects, followed by support visits to reinforce practices in the classroom.
PD aimed to familiarize teachers with instructions that could lead to enhanced student outcomes.
Pre- and post-tests on electricity and circuit concepts using the DIRECT test, evaluating understanding and application of key principles.
Conducted regular interviews with Ms. Adams, focusing on her experiences and reflections on both standard and e-textiles instructional approaches.
Data Analysis: Significant improvements in student learning outcomes were observed for those using the e-textiles curriculum compared to standard methods.
Teacher reported increased confidence post-PD and notable student enthusiasm in maker-based learning.
Enhanced relationships and student collaboration observed within the classroom environment; positive impact on students who previously struggled academically.
Challenges such as resource management, time constraints, and classroom organization noted.
E-textiles instruction led to improved mastery of scientific content and increased student engagement.
Teacher embraced the creativity and personal investment of students through the making process.
Positive learning experiences outweigh logistical challenges faced in managing maker technologies in classrooms.
Maker technologies, such as e-textiles, yield significant improvements over traditional learning experiences.
New teachers gain confidence and student success through making activities, suggesting pathways for teacher retention in education.
Future research opportunities should focus on enhancing the feasibility of integrating maker activities in standard curricula.