The actual concept of global interdependency on resources, power, and economics
globalization is the extension, acceleration, and intensification of consequential worldwide interconnections
Increasing, but uneven
Early: imperialism + capitalism = globalization
Interconnected, unequal, and uneven economy
The political buzzword coined in the 80s by politicians and economists to describe and produce global interdependence
Key traits: international trade, commodity chains, immigration, supranational institutions and governments, cross-border cultural hybridity, shared cross-border cultural products or norms, international financial flows, interdependent economic development
Drivers: economic forces, competition, individuals
Geography: flattening, shrinking, homogenizing, networked
Neoliberal globalization adopts rules that promote:
Cross-border flows of goods
Cross-border financial flows
Privatization of national industries
Limits on subsidies + other NTBs
Causes of poverty: bad economic policies | Solution: embrace free market economic policy
Rise of social safety net, public education, subsidies, etc.
Promotion of international trade // limits on financial flows
The concept of free-market economic policies that are pushed by this type of politicians
Came about in the time of Reagan and Thatcher
Neo = new // liberalism = free market, increasing global interdependence by shrinking government
“Economic + personal freedom” go hand in hand
Ex. Coup in Chile
Chicago Boys + neoliberalism in 1973
The agreement in “washington” of committing to free-market policies (other countries had to commit if they wanted US aid)
10 traits:
Liberalize trade
Privatize public services
Deregulate business/finance
Cut public spending
Reduce taxes
Encourage foreign investment
De-unionize
Export-led development
Reduce inflation
Enforce property rights
The broad movement beginning in the early 15th century of taking over other territories and countries
Hand in hand with capitalism
The extension of the power of one state beyond its border to control other people, place, and cultures
Driven in large part by desire for cheap resources, cheap (coerced) labor, new markets
Rise of an interconnected, uneven + unequal capitalist global economy
A specific instance of imperialism
Exploiting land, resources, and people
Formal control over one territory and its people by another
Capitalism
4 economic characteristics:
Depends on growth
Constant search for new markets to expand
Cut costs for cheaper raw materials and cheaper labor
Driver by competition to speed up production
Formal colonization of Americas with “settler + plantation colonies”
The “great dying”
Age of exploration
Fewer formal colonies ( cheaper)
More asia and africa
“Spheres of influence” and industrial revolution
US becomes imperial power // Latin America mostly independent
Formal colonization of Africa and Asia
Some settler colonies (South Africa) / most governed by small # of European elites
Industrial revolution in full swing
Pacific asia, fall of ottoman empire → carving of Middle East, US expands West
The very end of the 19th century when everyone realized how lucrative it would be to have a stake in Africa
1884 conference of Berlin
By 1990, Europe controlled 90% of Africa
Period in the West of industrializing industries
Rural → urban
Poor working conditions // unions
Led to a need for cheap labor and raw materials
Need industrial inputs and new markets
Rising western living standards ⇒ need to feed new consumption (rubber, oil, copper, coffee, sugar, etc.)
Understanding a nation’s economic success ONLY from its own history and understanding
Nation-state as primary unit of analysis // blank slate, fresh beginning
VS relational approach - connections among places, transnational dynamics
Twin processes of Capitalism + Imperialism produced a globalized world
All following legacies obscured by methodological nationalism
Economic:
Integrated markets, transnational commodity chains, uneven development
West: industrialized, higher wages + SOL // Rest: less industrialized, dependent on primary commodities, lower wages + standards
Demographic:
“We are here because you were there!”
Many impacted imperial colonies have people who end up going to imperial countries (i.e. Algerians in France)
National Borders: decolonization → new nation-states, less unity, border conflicts
Environmental: resource extraction, uneven carbon footprints, intensification of export-agriculture
The discourse beginning during imperialism that allowed the establishment of an “us” and “them”
Binary categories → justifies treatment of inferior
Stereotyping (simplification, essentialization, homogenization)
Dualisms (binary categories, opposites, hierarchical)
Produced:
Imperial domination
Racialized social + labor hierarchies
European identity
And Western social science
Concept of “ladder” of development/progress
A group of statements that provide a language for talking about a particular kind of knowledge about a topic (discursive formation)
Can be produced by many individuals in different settings
Not closed systems and never neutral
They don’t even need to be the same statements, just systematic
Produce a “regime of truth”
The global understanding of economic practices and rules that every country should follow
Established before neoliberalism
US influences and benefits // for the rest it’s the best option
3 key pillars:
Political liberalism
Economic liberalism
Liberal internationalism
The idea that if everyone is treated equally, they will become equal
Created post WWII, best system for US economy and better for everyone else
Demise: growing criticism of free trade, rise of BRICs, use of industrial policies + trade barriers
US standards and expectations enforced on all other countries (McDonaldization / Coca-Colonization ⇒ consensual hegemony-building orchestrated by American corporate interests abroad
There is military hegemony and social hegemony
Military hegemony abroad + social hegemony at home
Locked in through IMF and WB
Developed after the LIEO by countries who believe that treating everyone equally will perpetuate inequality // never actually implemented as a full package
Post-colonial plan
Key Pillars:
Right to national resources, nationalizing property
Negotiating better (nonmarket) prices for raw commodities
Greater power in international institutions
Promoting transfer of tech, knowledge + skills, to developing countries
Debt relief
One of the major International Institutions
Essentially the mediary between countries with trade disputes
Countries can sue for infringement of trade rights and WTO will decide who is right
Ex. Australia tried to put black lungs on their cigarette packages and tobacco countries sued them saying that they are infringing on their main source of income. WTO sided with Australia
Institutionally designed to:
Liberalize international trade
Enforce free trade rules
Arbitrate trade disputes
One country one vote // same rules for all members
Taxes on imports and exports
Any other policies that might affect trade… including:
Labeling and origin requirements, consumer protection laws, subsidies to particular industries, etc.
Mainly discussed by Hajoon Chang from South Korea
Primary argument:
Cornerstone of the free market is that there are “no rules”, however, every market has rules and has to have rules to function effectively
We have just become so desensitized to the rules of our free market that we don’t realize the rules are there
Ex. labor laws, environmental laws, health laws, regulatory agencies (FDA, EPA), etc.
Creates binary categories to compare other countries to the standards set by the west
Underdeveloped implies that the country is working towards it and can be aided
Underdeveloped implies “someone” is causing it, form of agency
The West underdeveloped the rest
A concept in globalization used by corporations to use and reproduce the differences in development in various countries
Ex. a phone company could use the development of tech in Belgium but knows it would be too expensive to produce the phone hardware there so they would turn to a country like India which is less developed and would do it cheaply
Often increased by “differential mobility”
Money and goods move evenly across borders but workers and places cannot move (easier to offshore than to bring the workers in)
The idea that the free market contributes to continued inequality
Every product goes through a long process in being created and often goes through different stages in different countries
Foster uneven globalization
Basic commodity chain:
Movement of raw materials from source to one or more sites to consumption + factory
Raw materials → manufacturing → shipment → consumer
Complex commodity chain:
Movement of multiple raw or intermediate goods to one or more destinations for further manufacturing/assembly
Raw materials → separate manufacturing → assembly → shipment → consumer
Using sub-national differences for profit
Offshoring: companies setting up a factory in another country because it is cheaper or there are less regulations
Ex. Nike sets up a Nike factory in India
Outsources: companies buying cheap materials from factories other countries own
Ex. Nike buys materials from an Indian factory
Typically fenced off areas in countries with different regulations and policies
Could have to do with working conditions, health regulations, tax regulations
Essentially normal laws don’t apply so it’s cheaper
Fundamental to global economy
70-90% female // sexual harrassment, lack of social services
“Race to the Bottom”
Companies using different countries’ people to accomplish different tasks for the same goal
Ex. Cargo boat: captain is Dutch, mechanics are Chinese, cleaners are Thai, etc.
Stages of economic production distributed across space
By type of labor and laborer: nationality, class, race, gender
Places “value” on certain kinds of labor
Poverty is the level to which an individual cannot afford to sustain themself whereas inequality is the difference in levels that individuals around the world are able to sustain themselves.
The process of reducing poverty and/or inequality
Strategies depend on how we explain P+I
The United Nations, well-respected index of international poverty levels and inequality
3 key features:
Long + healthy life
Good education
Decent standard of living
One of the two main International Financial Institutions
Originally established for the West after WWII (Britain in particular), but now primarily used by the Global South for loans
Shorter term loans and projects // i.e. countries in financial crisis
US hegemony, one dollar one vote, profits for US businesses
One of the two main International Financial Institutions
Also originally established for the West after WWII
Longer term loans and projects
US hegemony, one dollar one vote, profits for US businesses
The original methods used by the IFIs and West to give loans to the Global South struggling in the debt crisis
They would loan them the money but with a plethora of “conditionalities” essentially requiring them to implement free-market policies in order to keep the money
Essentially ruined whatever small economy mainly countries in Africa had succeeded in building during the 60s-70s
Conditionalities:
Cut social spending: no more healthcare, education, infrastructure, etc.
Privatize public goods
Encourage foreign investment
Pretty much tanked Global South economy because they all started producing the same crops which led to inflation
Occurred in the 1980s and caused many countries to have to turn to the IFIs and implement free-market policies
Opening of post-colonial world to integrate into global economy
Each nation-state has the sovereign authority to determine its own internal affairs
External authority: ability to be recognized as an equal player by other nations
Discourse started by the West to create binary categories
Once you have a superior and inferior, it is easier to justify atrocities
Exoticization, exploitation, colonization of the Rest by the West
The west is a historical, not geographical construct
Began with European barriers (Barrier of Fear, etc.) until first encounter
Encounter with “new worlds” —with difference—reinforced new identity of superiority // “Eurocentric view”
Europe tried to fit the new world into existing cultural frameworks
Those who produce the discourse also have the power to make it true
Juxtaposition of the New World as close to nature but almost barbaric
Discursive Strategies:
Idealization
Projection of fantasies of desire and degradation
Failure to recognize and respect difference
Tendency to impose European categories and norms
Stereotypic Dualism: split into 2 opposing elements
1: The free market is a myth: all markets have rules, we have just become blind to the rules of ours // prices politically determined
2: free market policies rarely make poor countries rich and virtually ALL of today’s rich countries used protectionism and subsidies to promote their infant industries
Developing countries need to protect + nurture their producers before being capable to compete in world market unassisted
America to developing countries: “Do as I say, not as I did”
Africa did not stay poor due to corruption, culture, resources, climate, geography, etc.
Africa stayed poor due to meddling by the West and the policies they were compelled to implement after the debt crisis
Other wealthy countries have malaria, are land-locked, and have abundant resources → used other forms of market policy to get rich then implemented free market
“Structural handicaps” = scapegoats
Rhetoric of Africa’s inability to succeed economically was proliferated after free-market policies failed and economists couldn’t explain why!
Chap 1:
globalization and ‘G’lobalization are different
One is the concept and one is the buzzword
globalization is the extension, acceleration, and intensification of consequential worldwide interconnections
‘G’lobalization describes and produces inequality
Introduced by Reagan and thatcher as TINA
Promote radical reformations of the economy + trade to be globally competitive
Freedom from want/fear = free market
Chap 7:
There is no such thing as the “end of the nation-state”, tied to ‘G’lobalization rhetoric myths
Governance - umbrella term for diverse forms of formal and informal systems of control
Governmentality - social systems of political control
Hegemony - US influence
“Shock therapy” of overnight neoliberalization (TINA)
Global market discipline
IFI’s designed to maximize US influence + minimize budgetary burden (not international aid organizations)
Fund: short term balance of payments [Fund > Bank]
Bank: longer-range challenges of development
One dollar one vote
IMF:
Regulate the rates at which currencies were exchanged among member countries
Ensure international monetary stability by making short-term loans to countries suffering ba;ance of payment crises
Discipline through debt
“Obedience = good governance” //NO// conditionality = disempowering (externally imposed neocolonial control)
WB:
Development Bank → Knowledge Bank (‘poverty-fighting’)
Pattern of market-responsive “responsibilization”