AW

Scientific Racism & Anthropology: AnthroBytes Conversation with Dr. Rachel Watkins

Episode Context

  • AnthroBytes: short, digest-style series produced by the Society for Cultural Anthropology (SCA) in collaboration with the American Anthropological Association (AAA).

  • Host: Dr. Siobhán McGurk.

  • Guest: Dr. Rachel Watkins — Associate Professor of Biological & Cultural Anthropology, American University.

  • Focus: Tracing the history of the race concept, unpacking "scientific racism," and spotlighting Watkins’s own scholarship.

Defining & Historicizing “Race”

• Race as essential biological difference: early anatomists/physicians elevated visible traits (skin color, hair texture) to markers of innate ability, intellect, morality, and “fitness.”
• Dr. Watkins (biological anthropologist) underscores: surface differences represent minimal biological power — they lie on continua of variation all humans share.
• Period of origin: long 18th–19th centuries, beginning with Carl Linnaeus (1707-1778).

Linnaean Taxonomy & Subspecies
  • Linnaeus’s famous \text{kingdom} \rightarrow \text{phylum} \rightarrow \text{class} \rightarrow \text{order} \rightarrow \text{family} \rightarrow \text{genus} \rightarrow \text{species} hierarchy included a subspecies level.

  • He named four human “sub-species”:
    Homo sapiens Europaeus (“European”)
    Homo sapiens Asiaticus (“Asiatic”)
    Homo sapiens Americanus (“Indigenous American”)
    Homo sapiens Africanus (“African”).

  • Each subspecies carried phenotypic descriptors AND behavioral/intellectual judgments (e.g., Europeans = rational; Africans = “low intellect”).

  • These layered descriptions forge the template for later racial hierarchies.

Biological Anthropology’s Early Agenda

• 19th-century forerunners sought empirical confirmation of racial hierarchy.
• Method: harvest and measure skeletal collections labelled “White,” “Black,” “Indian,” etc.
Craniometry (Samuel Morton):

  • Amassed hundreds of skulls.

  • Used cranial capacity & angles to “prove” European superiority.

  • Measurements interpreted through a priori racial categories (circular logic).

Scientific Racism → Colonialism & Slavery

• Racial categories quickly turned hierarchical.
• Ideology: Europeans at apex; Africans at base.
• Traits as “natural” evidence that Africans required supervision ⇒ moral justification for enslavement.
• Additional pseudo-biological claims: disease susceptibility, lung capacity, pain tolerance, etc. — all mapped onto Black bodies to rationalize exploitation.

Modern Legacies & Everyday Examples

• Athleticism stereotype: enduring belief that Black bodies are innately better sprinters/jumpers — traceable from Jesse Owens vs. Hitler narrative to today’s 100\,\text{m} dash line-ups.
• “Positive” stereotypes (e.g., “Asians are math geniuses”) remain essentialist and perpetuate race thinking.
• Complementary racism = insidious because it masquerades as flattery while reifying difference.

Race vs. Racism: Pedagogical Tension

  • Anthropologists juggle two imperatives:

    1. Teach race as a social construct lacking biological validity.

    2. Expose and analyze racism’s material impacts.

  • Strategy advised by Watkins: attend to context — e.g., a track final isn’t “natural,” but a product of access, training, economics, history.

De-Naturalizing Sporting “Environments”

• Track example: lineup dominated by named Black athletes is socially produced, not evidence of innate racial fitness.
• Basketball timeline: once mostly Jewish players → mid-20th-century Black dominance → now far more diverse. Demonstrates flux, contradicts essentialism.

From Crania to Genes: A Technological Shift

• Human Genome Diversity Project (HGDP): aimed to showcase shared humanity.
• But race’s social power bends interpretation of genomic data: researchers & the public mine genes for racial confirmation.

  • Genetic ancestry tests market “Who you are” narratives.

  • Violates principles: genes reveal probabilities, not discrete racial essences.

Dr. Watkins’s Scholarly Trajectory

Lineage at Howard University
  • Influenced by Dr. William Montague Cobb — first African American PhD in biological anthropology.

  • Cobb’s skeleton collection assembled specifically to debunk skeletal race typing by illustrating intra-group diversity.

Methodological Commitments
  1. Treat humans as bio-cultural beings: biology entwined with social embedding.

  2. Examine skeletal collections through cultural & historical lenses:

    • Watkins curates Cobb’s collection; analyzes not only existing skeletons but documented individuals whose remains are missing.

  3. Experiment with non-traditional forms:

    • Fictional narratives to humanize skeletal data.

    • Reconstructing population samples holistically (including absent remains) to mirror original community makeup.

  4. Integrate Black feminist theory:

    • Builds on feminist turns in archaeology & bioarchaeology (e.g., Whitney Battle-Baptiste’s “Black Feminist Archaeology”).

    • Calls for analogous turn in biological anthropology, still lacking.

Disciplinary Self-Critique & Future Directions

• Biological anthropology today remains predominantly white & male.
• Need dual critique:

  • (a) Race/racism in materials studied (skeletal remains, genetic data).

  • (b) Racial politics of the field itself (gatekeeping, research questions, hiring).
    • Watkins: data production must be accompanied by reflexive cultural reading of both data and researchers.

Key Takeaways

  • Visible human variation ≠ discrete, hierarchical races. All phenotypes reside on shared biological continua.

  • Scientific racism historically underwrote slavery, colonialism, segregation, and lingers via “complimentary” stereotypes.

  • New genetic technologies can reinscribe old racial myths unless interpreted critically.

  • Bioanthropology must fuse biology with culture, adopt intersectional feminist frameworks, and diversify its practitioner base.

  • Deconstructing race entails tackling conceptual, methodological, and institutional levels simultaneously.

Supporting Resources & Further Study

  • Cobb skeleton catalog (Howard University).

  • Whitney Battle-Baptiste, Black Feminist Archaeology.

  • Critical analyses of HGDP & commercial genetic ancestry testing.

  • SCA website (colanth.org) for teaching materials; AnthroBytes podcast archives.

Practical/Philosophical Implications

• Ethical: misinterpretations of biology have profound human costs; scientists bear responsibility for countering misuse.
• Philosophical: challenges Enlightenment rationalism that treats racial categories as “objective.”
• Pragmatic: educators should embed race‐as‐social‐construct lessons within discussions of systemic racism, not separate them.