CE

Chapter#6 - The Politics of Public Opinion

Page 1: The Politics of Public Opinion

  • Factors that influence political attitudes
    • Race/Ethnicity
    • Geographic regions
    • Social Class
    • Family
    • Education
    • Media
    • Public Opinion
    • Religion
    • Gender
    • Marital status
    • Socialization
    • Political environment

Page 2: Political Ideologies

  • Political Ideology: The set of underlying ideas and beliefs through which we come to understand and interpret politics.
  • Liberal: Generally support social and political reform, government intervention in the economy, more economic equality, expansion of federal and social services, and greater concern for consumers and the environment.
  • Conservative: Generally support the social and economic status quo and are suspicious of efforts to introduce new political formulas and economic arrangements; conservatives believe that a large and powerful government poses a threat to citizens' freedom.
  • Socialist: Generally believe in social ownership, strong government, free markets, and reducing economic inequality.
  • Libertarian: Supports individual liberty over government authority in economic, personal, and social realms.

Page 3: Political Socialization

  • People’s attitudes about political issues and elected officials tend to be shaped by their underlying political beliefs and values.
  • The process through which these underlying political beliefs and values are formed is collectively called political socialization.
  • 5 agents of socialization that foster differences in political perspectives:
    • Family
    • Membership in social groups
    • Education
    • Religion
    • Political environment

Page 4: Agents of Socialization

  • Families
    • Most people acquire their initial orientation to politics from their families.
    • Children raised in households where the primary caregivers are Democrats tend to become Democrats, whereas children raised in homes where their caregivers are Republicans tend to favor the Republican Party.
    • Example: Not all children absorb their parent’s political views. Ronald Reagan’s three children rejected their parent's conservative values and became active on behalf of Democratic candidates.
  • Social Groups
    • Other important sources of political values are social groups to which individuals belong, including political parties, labor unions, military, and educational groups.
    • Membership in a particular group can give individuals experiences and perspectives that shape their view of political and social life.

Page 5: Agents of Socialization (Continued)

  • Education
    • Education may be the greatest equalizer. Governments use public education to teach a common set of civic values; it is mainly in school that Americans acquire basic beliefs in liberty, equality, and democracy.
    • Differences in formal education are strongly associated with differences in political outlook.
    • Example: college graduates tend to vote, join campaigns, and protest more than those who do not pursue a college education.
  • Religion
    • Religions or religious leaders are important instructors, especially regarding morality and self-sacrifice; they are important factors in the development of personal identity.
    • Conservative denominations and religions (e.g., Southern Baptist or Catholics) tend to impart more conservative attitudes, especially regarding abortion, than more liberal churches do.

Page 6: Agents of Socialization (Continued)

  • Political Environment
    • Although beliefs are influenced by family, social groups, education, and religion, the content and character of these views are largely determined by the political environment.
    • Example: The baby-boom generation that came of age in the 1960s was exposed to Vietnam War, widespread antiwar protests on college campuses and in urban areas, which fundamentally shaped their opinions.
    • Similarly, events like September 11 and the war on terrorism helped shape the political lives of those who came of age in the 1990s and 2000s.

Page 7

  • (No content provided in the transcript for Page 7.)

Page 8: Measuring Public Opinions

  • Historically, leaders gauged public opinion by crowds at meetings and applause; this direct exposure did not always yield accurate knowledge of public opinion, but gave leaders confidence in public support.
  • Today, public officials extensively use public-opinion polls to decide whether to run for office, what policies to support, how to vote on legislation, and what kinds of appeals to use in campaigns.
  • All recent presidents and other major political figures work closely with polls and pollsters.

Page 9: Different Types of Polls (Part 1)

  • Straw Poll
    • Early method: unscientific opinion samples from 19th-century newspapers used to predict a winner.
    • Not guaranteed to be representative of the population.
    • Example: 1936 Literary Digest poll predicted Alf Landon would defeat Franklin D. Roosevelt, but Roosevelt won in a landslide.
    • Reason for error: relied on telephone directories and automobile registration rosters; during the Great Depression only wealthier Americans owned telephones and cars, excluding working-class Americans who supported Roosevelt.
  • Random Sampling
    • Polling method that canvasses people at random from the population or uses a random-number generator.
    • Each member of the population has an equal and independent chance of being selected.

Page 10: Different Types of Polls (Part 2)

  • Stratified Sampling
    • Participants are chosen based on age, income, and socioeconomic background to mirror the larger population; the opposite of random sampling.
  • Exit Polling
    • Polling technique that predicts winners as polls close by surveying departing voters; identify precincts that approximate the larger entity and sample accordingly.
  • Tracking Polls
    • Repeatedly sample the same voters during a campaign to identify shifts in opinions and correlate with media strategy, voter issues, and candidate mistakes; helps determine which campaign strategies work.

Page 11: Methods Used to Conduct Public-Opinion Polls

  • 3 Methods Used to Conduct Public-Opinion Polls:
    • Phone Surveys
    • Online Surveys
    • Face-to-Face Surveys
  • Example of a survey instrument (Likert-scale):
    • Very Satisfied • Satisfied • Neutral • Unsatisfied • Very Unsatisfied

Page 12: Methods Used to Administer Public Opinion Polls

  • Telephone Surveys
    • A computer random number generator is used to produce a list of 10-digit telephone numbers.
    • Given that 95\% of Americans have telephones, this technique usually results in random national samples.
    • The Telephone Consumer Protection Act restricts the use of autodialers to contact cell phones and requires explicit consent for any automated calls.
  • Online Surveys
    • Can be more efficient and less costly; include larger samples of young people and yield more accurate results within age groups.
    • Many online surveys do not use random sampling and thus may not be representative; reflect those willing to take a quiz online.
  • Face-to-Face Surveys
    • The American National Election Studies (ANES) have conducted face-to-face surveys; costly, so ANES uses a sample of 2,000+ respondents from different regions.
    • In-person surveys remain one of the most valuable and accurate methods.

Page 13: Polls

  • Polls are useful predictive instruments but are not always reliable.
  • The way a question is phrased can significantly affect results. Examples:
    • Do you support a woman’s rights over her body? vs. Do you support the right to terminate a pregnancy in the first trimester?
  • Stakeholders (candidates, corporations, interest groups) can influence poll results through careful phrasing (carrying out push-polling).
  • Hundreds of polls are conducted in presidential election years; more polls do not necessarily produce better results, though in the last three presidential elections they have been fairly accurate.
  • Example: In the 2008 presidential election, polls on the eve of the election projected an Obama advantage of 7.52\%; Obama’s actual margin of victory was 7.2\%.

Page 14: What Can Cause Poll Results to be Inaccurate? (Part 1)

  • Selection Bias
    • Polling error that arises when the sample is not representative of the population, causing over- or under-representation of certain opinions.
    • Example: The 1936 Literary Digest poll again, due to reliance on telephone directories and automobile rosters; wealthier Americans were overrepresented and working-class Americans were underrepresented.
  • The Bandwagon Effect
    • A shift in electoral support to the candidate whom public opinion polls report as the front-runner.
    • Polling results can influence people to support the leading candidate.

Page 15: What Can Cause Poll Results to be Inaccurate? (Part 2)

  • Push Polling
    • A polling technique in which questions are designed to shape the respondent's opinion.
    • Notable example: the 2000 South Carolina Republican presidential primary where a push poll suggested that John McCain had fathered an illegitimate black child.
    • Callers working for Bush supporters asked conservatives white voters if they would be more or less likely to vote for McCain knowing about the alleged child; many voters accepted the premise.
    • The push poll is cited by McCain as an instance of smear tactics used in campaigns; it contributed to the broader concerns about exposing families to the stresses of political races.