BIOLOGICAL FACTORS & GENE–ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION IN DEPRESSION
KEY TERMS
Serotonin: A neurotransmitter involved in mood regulation; low levels are often linked to symptoms of depression.
Gene Mutation: A permanent change in the DNA sequence of a gene, potentially affecting its function.
MDD (Major Depressive Disorder): A serious mental disorder characterized by persistent sadness, loss of interest, and other emotional and physical symptoms.
Gene-Environment Interaction: The idea that certain genetic predispositions may be expressed only when triggered by specific environmental factors.
THEORY: Diathesis-Stress Model
Suggests that individuals have a biological vulnerability (diathesis) to mental disorders, which is only triggered when combined with environmental stress.
Applied to depression: not everyone with a genetic predisposition develops depression—life stressors often activate the condition.
The 5-HTT gene, involved in serotonin reuptake, has two alleles: short (s) and long (l). The short allele is associated with reduced serotonin transporter efficiency and possibly greater emotional sensitivity to stress.
AIM
To investigate whether a gene–environment interaction exists for the 5-HTT serotonin transporter gene mutation in the development of major depressive disorder (MDD).
METHOD (Caspi et al., 2003)
Participants: 847 New Zealanders (age 26), from a longitudinal Dunedin cohort.
Genetic Grouping:
Group 1: Two short alleles (s/s)
Group 2: One short, one long allele (s/l)
Group 3: Two long alleles (l/l)
Procedure:
Participants completed a stressful life events questionnaire, reporting 14 types of stressors (e.g., financial, relationship, health) between ages 21–26.
Depression symptoms and suicidal thoughts were assessed using a standardized clinical interview.
Variables
Independent Variables (IVs):
Genotype: Type of 5-HTT allele (s/s, s/l, l/l)
Environmental stress: Number of reported stressful life events
Dependent Variable (DV):
Level of depressive symptoms and diagnosis of MDD, including suicidal ideation
FINDINGS
Participants with one or two short alleles experienced significantly more depressive symptoms after stressful events.
Highest depression levels occurred in those with two short alleles and multiple life stressors.
No major increase in depression was found in individuals with two long alleles, even under stress.
Simply inheriting the short allele did not cause depression—stress was a necessary trigger.
APPLICATIONS
Demonstrates the importance of gene–environment interaction in depression.
Suggests more personalised interventions (e.g., stress management programs) for individuals with known genetic vulnerabilities.
Encourages a holistic view of mental health—integrating biology with environmental and psychological factors.
EVALUATION
Strengths
Holistic approach: Integrates genetic and environmental factors—supports diathesis-stress model.
Large sample size (847): Increases generalizability and statistical power.
Longitudinal design: Tracks participants over time, helping to establish temporal relationships.
Limitations
Correlational: No causal relationship can be confirmed between the gene, stress, and depression.
Self-report bias: Stressful life events were self-reported—subject to memory distortion or social desirability.
Low reliability: Meta-analyses (e.g., Risch et al., 2009) failed to replicate findings, casting doubt on the robustness.
Not fully explanatory: Some people with the short allele did not develop depression; others without the mutation did, suggesting additional factors are involved.
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS
Informed consent: Participants were informed about genetic testing and mental health research.
Confidentiality: Sensitive genetic and psychological data were securely protected.
Psychological harm: Discussion of stress and depression may cause distress—mental health support should be provided.
Genetic determinism risk: Results may contribute to stigma or fatalistic thinking (e.g., “I’m genetically doomed”).
UNANSWERED QUESTIONS / CRITICAL THINKING
Is serotonin dysregulation a cause or symptom of depression?
What protective factors (e.g., social support, coping skills) reduce depression risk even in genetically vulnerable individuals?
How do other genes interact with 5-HTT, and can future research better explain inconsistencies?
CONCLUSION
Caspi et al. (2003) provides strong evidence for the gene–environment interaction in depression and supports the diathesis-stress model.
The study advanced biological psychology by highlighting how genetic predispositions require environmental triggers.
However, replication issues, correlational design, and ethical concerns suggest that conclusions should be interpreted cautiously.
Overall, depression is best understood through a biopsychosocial approach, rather than solely genetic or environmental explanations.