Peter (1 Pet 2:13-17) & Paul (Rom 13:1-3)
Instruct Christians to submit to emperors & governors as God-ordained authorities.
Paul emphasizes:
"No authority except from God."
Resistance = resistance to God → incurs judgment.
Contextual tension: written during Nero’s reign (active persecutor of Christians).
Core eschatological mindset
Christians are "pilgrims" awaiting the Second Coming & eternal life.
Delay of Parousia raised urgent practical questions:
How to live as citizens & soldiers in a still-unredeemed world?
Relation of “turn the other cheek” to civic/military duties.
Early Christian dilemma leads to systematic reflection → climax in St Thomas Aquinas.
Aristotelian corpus re-enters West via Islamic commentaries (especially Averroes).
Islamic & Jewish Platonic political readings (al-Fārābī, Avicenna, Averroes, Maimonides):
Scripture as multilayered rhetoric → noble lies for masses; esoteric truths for philosophers.
God portrayed as impersonal, devoid of emotions; denies retributive justice.
Muslim backlash
Al-Ghazālī’s critique → philosophy branded subversive, forced underground.
Initial Christian reaction
Condemnation & attempts to suppress Aristotelian studies as heretical.
Life span: 1225\text{–}1274.
Goal: Harmonize pagan rationalism (esp. Aristotle) with Christian revelation.
Reason points toward faith; faith presupposes & crowns reason.
Strategic response to Averroism:
Rejects subordination of Scripture to philosophy while retaining philosophical tools.
Ultimately wins within Catholicism; yet sparks minority of "Latin Averroists" (Marsilius, Dante).
Commentaries on Aristotle & Scripture.
Two "Summas":
Summa contra Gentiles – apologetic; argues against pagan/Jewish/Islamic positions.
Summa Theologiae (unfinished)
Pedagogical aim: brief, clear compendium "for beginners".
Disputed-question format
Each question = objections → Aquinas’s answer ("sed contra" & "respondeo") → replies.
Promotes critical thinking; objections sometimes judged valid.
Foundational claim: Unassisted human reason grasps much moral truth (via Aristotle) yet remains incomplete without revelation.
Sharp contrast: natural vs. divine law
Natural law = universally knowable moral code.
Divine law = revealed commands inaccessible to reason alone (e.g., Sabbath observance).
Practical authority:
Grounds universal moral critique (e.g., Martin Luther King Jr.’s civil-rights appeal).
Inborn "habit" within practical reason, not a faculty above reason.
Parallel to innate logical principles (non-contradiction, causality).
Universality illustrated by cross-cultural prohibitions (murder, theft, adultery).
Distortions & violations
Passion, bad custom, and original sin cloud conscience.
Natural punishment = pangs of guilt.
Eternal Law – God’s providential governance of all creation.
Natural Law – Human participation in Eternal Law through reason.
Human (Positive) Law – Concrete statutes promulgated by legitimate rulers to apply natural law.
Law of Concupiscence – Disordered impulses; punishment for original sin.
Divine (Revealed) Law (Old & New Covenants) overlays the system:
Supplements natural law for clearer civil legislation.
Points beyond political happiness to supernatural beatitude.
"An ordinance of reason, for the common good, made by one who has care of the community, and promulgated."
Each element is normative; defective statutes = “perversions of law.”
Moral obligation arises only when law aligns with reason & common good.
Three tiers of natural inclination → precepts
Self-preservation (shared with all beings)
Prohibitions: suicide, murder.
Duties: safeguard life, provide material sustenance, defend polity.
Reproduction & family (shared with animals)
Duties: honor parents, marital fidelity, nurture children; bans on incest/adultery.
Rational/social perfection (unique to humans)
Pursuit of virtue, knowledge, contemplation of God.
Civic duties: establish just government, combat tyranny, wage just wars, respect property.
Primary aim: make citizens virtuous (echo of Aristotle).
Virtue inculcated via habituation; coercion often necessary → punishment and reward.
“To advise” ≠ law; law’s efficacy lies in coercive power.
Model legislation: Mosaic civil & moral code.
Ten Commandments’ “second table” mirrors categorical natural prohibitions.
Extended ordinances: honor elders, outlaw prostitution/scandal, enforce charity, regulate luxury (sumptuary laws), mandate civic education, censor harmful arts.
Spectrum of regulation
Cannot outlaw every vice; targets external acts affecting common good.
Commands every virtue indirectly (public dimension of all virtues).
Categorical Imperatives
Absolute bans: murder of innocents, adultery, theft, perjury, covetousness → no dispensation.
Common good transcends mere utility; spiritual welfare may override material prosperity or safety.
Continuities
Happiness as ultimate end; humans “by nature political.”
Emphasis on communal duties over individual rights.
Divergences
Aquinas: Natural law (fixed, universal) vs. Aristotle’s context-dependent “natural right.”
Biblical revelation supplies an actual historical best regime (Mosaic polity).
Adds doctrines of original sin, hierarchy of laws, supernatural destiny.
Lower function: Clarify/supplement natural law for legislation.
Higher function: Orient to eternal life; impose ceremonial & charity obligations unknown to reason.
Old Law: Ritual worship, dietary laws, temple sacrifices.
New Law: Eucharist, universal love (even enemies), evangelical counsels.
Political upshot:
State should privilege and support true religion wherever possible.
When Christian majority absent, appeal to natural law remains viable basis for civic discourse (cf. MLK’s strategy).
Martin Luther King Jr. (1963) cites Aquinas: unjust segregation laws violate Eternal/Natural Law by degrading personality.
Condemnation of usury/capitalism
Charging interest = "selling what does not exist" → injustice & inequality (ST II-II 78).
Military & civic obedience
Obedience itself is a high virtue; lawful authority fosters moral character.
Religion as highest virtue
Government duty to promote worship and theological reflection—even in non-Christian societies (natural knowledge of God).
Modern liberal democracies viewed as “mutilated” societies: tolerate rather than perfect; Thomists work to insert virtue ethics within pluralistic frameworks.
Demonstrates integration of faith & reason without reducing one to the other.
Provides perennial framework for natural-law ethics influencing:
Catholic social teaching.
Human-rights discourse.
Jurisprudential theories (Finnis, Grisez, etc.).
Raises unresolved debates:
Did Aquinas distort Aristotle or correct him?
Tension between coercive virtue legislation and modern liberty.
Viability of absolute moral norms ("categorical imperatives") in multicultural contexts.
Humans naturally know & are bound by moral law; reason supplies universal ethical floor.
Political authority legitimate when rational, ordered to common (esp. spiritual) good, and promulgated.
Human law must foster virtue, punish vice, never contradict natural law.
Divine revelation elevates moral horizon to eternal destiny, intensifying civic obligations toward religion and charity.
Aquinas’s synthesis—uniting Aristotelian philosophy with Christian theology—remains foundational for Western moral, political, and legal thought.