Module 12.1 Strategies and Payoffs Lecture
Understanding Game Theory
Introduction to Game Theory
Examines decision making where outcomes are influenced by the actions of others.
Important for understanding behaviors when payoffs depend on interactions between individuals.
Utilized in various fields, including economics and sports.
Elements of a Game
Players
Example: Steph and Tanya, roommates with shared interests.
Strategies
Complete action plans available to players.
Example: Each can choose to either clean the apartment or play video games.
Payoffs
Rewards for each combination of strategies.
Payoffs represent happiness or utility rather than just monetary value.
Payoff Matrix
Simultaneous Move Game
Players make decisions without knowledge of the other's choice.
This assumption helps explore less-than-ideal outcomes.
Payoff Example:
Strategy / Tanya
Play Video Games
Clean
Play Video Games
(2, 2)
(10, 0)
Clean
(0, 10)
(6, 6)
Payoff Analysis:
Both play video games: payoffs of $2 each (disliked outcome - dirty apartment).
One cleans, one plays: the cleaner has a lower payoff (0); the player has a higher payoff (10).
Both clean results in highest mutual payoff of $6 each.
Dominant Strategy
Definition:
A strategy that is best for a player regardless of what the other does.
Analysis for Steph:
If Tanya plays video games, Steph’s payoffs are (2, from video games) and (0, from cleaning), supporting playing video games.
If Tanya cleans, Steph gets (6 from cleaning) or (10 from video games), so also chooses to play video games.
Similarly, analyze Tanya's decisions:
She finds playing video games is her best choice, regardless if Steph plays or cleans.
Dominant Strategy Equilibrium
Outcome:
Both players choosing to play video games leads to payoffs of $2 each.
Despite not being the optimal choice (could achieve $6 each from cleaning together), each player’s strategy keeps them in a suboptimal equilibrium.
Applications of Game Theory
Prisoner’s Dilemma:
Classic example where mutual cooperation leads to better outcomes but individual strategies lead to suboptimal results.
Situations include nuclear arms races and pricing strategies among competitors.
Conclusion
Understanding how to analyze interactions through game theory can help avoid breakdowns in rational behavior and foster cooperation among individuals.