Congress Notes Review: Introduction to the Legislative Branch

Incumbency, incentives, and advantages

  • Incumbents in Congress are reelected at a very high rate, driven by multiple advantages that reinforce their ability to stay in office.
  • Major factors contributing to reelection:
    • Name recognition and visibility
    • Access to more money for campaigns
    • Legislative influence and ability to deliver for constituents
    • Media exposure and positive public profile
  • Practical upshots include strong fundraising and structural perks that make challenging incumbents costly and risky.

Leadership, polarization, and the backbone of Congress

  • Key leadership roles in Congress: Speaker of the House and Senate Majority Leader.
  • A central topic is polarization: each year, Republicans become more conservative and Democrats more liberal, widening the gap between parties.
  • The system relies on committees, especially standing committees, which are described as the backbone of Congress and crucial to whether a middle-class-friendly bill can become law.

Structure and fragmentation of Congress

  • Congress is fragmented across borders and interests with two chambers (House and Senate).
  • Fragmentation leads to difficulty in achieving unitary action; the president often takes the lead on national issues while Congress handles smaller, more routine matters.
  • Congress has three main policy roles: lawmaking, representation, and oversight.
  • Some commentators argue Congress can seem ineffective at national leadership, but it remains central to many domestic functions.

The personal calculus of being a member of Congress

  • A widely cited view (from political science) is that members are driven by a strong desire for reelection and power, rather than nobility, with a profession focused on maintaining office.
  • The practical consequences of that focus include strategic behavior aimed at staying in office, including fundraising, district service, and committee assignments.

Compensation, staff, and service to constituents

  • Salary: estimated at 175{,}000 per year (officeholders)
  • Staff allocations (per year and capacity):
    • House members: about 1{,}000{,}000 to hire 18 permanent staff
    • Senators: about 3{,}000{,}000 to 5{,}000{,}000 to hire 30–50 staff
  • Staff size in other democracies is typically much smaller (average parliament staff is about 3–4 people).
  • Rationale for large staffs: more staff means more services to constituents, more ears to hear complaints, and more capacity to respond promptly to constituent needs.
  • Service strategy: personal staff perform services for constituents to provide information and aid, improving perceived responsiveness.

Perks that reinforce incumbency

  • Travel and communication perks help incumbents stay connected with constituents:
    • Free trips between Washington, DC and districts
    • Free mail (franking privileges) to disseminate information and maintain contact with voters
  • These perks give incumbents a continuous, low-cost channel to stay in touch with the public and showcase their work.

Campaign finance and the money race

  • Campaign fundraising is central to elections:
    • Incumbents typically have a strong fundraising advantage, often able to outspend challengers by a wide margin.
    • Races can reach very high dollar levels, sometimes between 20{,}000{,}000 and 40{,}000{,}000 in high-profile contests.
  • Individual contributions: the average contribution from ordinary supporters tends to be small (e.g., around 200 per donor).
  • Political action committees (PACs): groups aligned with interests can provide substantial campaign financing;
    • PACs tend to prefer incumbents due to established access and expectations of favorable policy outcomes.
  • The combined effect of high fundraising and visibility makes incumbents particularly hard to defeat.

Gerrymandering, redistricting, and electoral protection

  • Redistricting occurs every ten years after the census to redraw district lines so populations are roughly equal across districts.
  • The state legislature typically controls redistricting, which can be used to lock in electoral advantages for incumbents or their party (gerrymandering).
  • Partisan gerrymandering serves the interests of the controlling party in a state and can concentrate or dilute vote shares to protect incumbents;
    • The Supreme Court has treated redistricting as a statewide issue rather than an exclusively federal one in some contexts, limiting direct federal intervention.
  • Visual imagery: districts sometimes become oddly shaped (a “goofy bird” or other odd shapes) as a reflection of strategic manipulation of lines.

Pork-barrel politics and service-based representation

  • Pork barrel spending: legislatures insert targeted spending into bills to benefit specific districts, increasing political support from constituents.
  • Rationale: more money returned to districts translates into votes and perceived responsiveness.
  • Service strategy (constituent services): staff assist individuals with problems, information, and advocacy, strengthening incumbents’ public image.

The life of an incumbent: advantages and threats

  • The net effect of these advantages creates powerful incentives to seek reelection and to manage controversy carefully.
  • Disruptive issues can threaten incumbents if they fail to respond effectively (e.g., immigration, gun control, income inequality in 2018).
  • Personal misconduct can end political careers (e.g., high-profile cases like Duncan Hunter).
  • The dynamics of scandal, public anger, and retirement contribute to turnover and electoral shifts.

The legislative process: getting a bill from idea to law

  • Most bills die in committee: roughly a 90% chance a bill dies in committee; many die in subcommittees.
  • Reasons for high failure rate:
    • Many bills are not seriously intended to pass; constituents press a problem, the idea is brought to committee, and then the bill dies.
    • Politicians can claim they tried without bearing responsibility for the failure.
  • If a bill clears committee, it goes to the floor, where House and Senate rules differ:
    • House: rules committee controls debate length, amendments, and floor procedures; there are time limits on debate.
    • Senate: generally allows unlimited debate; cloture can end debate with a 60-vote threshold (filibuster rule).
  • Filibuster and cloture:
    • A filibuster is the practice of continuous debate to block a bill; the only way to stop it is to invoke cloture and end debate.
    • The cloture threshold is typically 60 out of 100 senators.
    • The cultural norm is to argue and debate to win support rather than relying on a simple majority.
    • There are notable exceptions: since 2013, filibuster restrictions on most presidential nominees; since 2017, restrictions on Supreme Court nominees.
  • How a bill becomes law after passage in both houses:
    • The president can sign into law, veto, or take no action (pocket veto). If vetoed, a two‑thirds override in both chambers can still make it law: rac{2}{3} of both chambers.
    • A veto override is rare, making presidential approval a decisive step in most cases.

The president, Congress, and the balance of power

  • The president’s veto power and the threat of a veto shape Congressional strategy and content of legislation.
  • Presidential support or opposition can dramatically influence legislative outcomes, especially given the fragmentation and partisan divides in Congress.

The three core functions of Congress, and their scope

  • Lawmaking: Congress creates and modifies the legal framework that enables governance, with powers including taxation, spending, commerce, and the declaration of war.
    • Major powers center on money and policy implementation; many bills involve budget and appropriations.
    • Congress is sometimes hesitant to tackle large national issues in one go due to the breadth of voices and the risk of deadlock; the executive branch often bears the lead on major national initiatives.
  • Representation: Congress represents both national interests and local constituencies; committees balance these concerns.
    • Committees focus on local issues, but some areas (like foreign policy) require specialized knowledge where constituent input is limited, necessitating expert decision-making.
    • The rise of polarization affects representation, pushing members to serve party agendas and align with partisan voters.
  • Oversight: Congress monitors and holds the executive branch accountable, including hearings and potential contempt proceedings for noncompliant agencies.
    • Oversight is a key check on the presidency and the administration’s implementation of laws.

Representation in a polarized era

  • The polarization of parties means that Democratic and Republican members are increasingly oriented toward their own bases, with less cross-party negotiation.
  • Local differences may be deemphasized as national party identity dominates, shaping voting patterns and policy stances.
  • Some scholars argue that clear party platforms improve voter clarity and accountability, while others argue that extreme polarization hinders compromise and pragmatic problem-solving.

How Congress relates to founders’ intentions and real-world governance

  • The founders hoped for a spirit of compromise and moderate governance, aiming to transcend petty differences.
  • The transcript argues that intense partisanship has emerged as a dominant force, complicating cooperation and policy-making.
  • Despite fragmentation, Congress remains essential for managing numerous small-scale issues and ensuring accountability through representation and oversight.

Key numerical and structural highlights (quick reference)

  • Incumbent reelection rates: P( ext{reelection}| ext{incumbent}) ext{ is about } 0.92 ext{ in the House and } 0.86 ext{ in the Senate}.
  • Salary: ext{House member salary} = \$175{,}000.
  • Staff funding:
    • House: \$1{,}000{,}000\text{ per year for 18 staff}.
    • Senate: \$3{,}000{,}000\text{ to }\$5{,}000{,}000\text{ per year for 30–50 staff}.
  • Races and fundraising: high-profile races can reach up to \$20{,}000{,}000\$ to \$40{,}000{,}000.
  • Redistricting cycle: every 10 years after the census; redistricting is controlled by the state legislature and can be exploited via gerrymandering.
  • Safe district share: approximately \frac{60}{435} \approx 0.138 \approx 13.8\% of House districts are competitive; the remainder are largely safe.
  • Filibuster and cloture: to end a filibuster, at least 60 votes are required in a 100-member Senate; cloture threshold is 60/100 = 0.60.
  • Override of veto: requires a supermajority of rac{2}{3}$$ in both chambers to become law over the president's veto.

Notable examples and anecdotes mentioned

  • 2018 debates highlighted issues like immigration, gun control, and income inequality, which influenced incumbents to retire or face electoral pressure.
  • Duncan Hunter’s resignation in 2020 after pleading guilty to misconduct related to campaign funds.
  • The emphasis on “getting things done” through small, controllable pieces of legislation rather than large sweeping reforms.

Summary takeaway

  • Congress operates through a complex mix of incentives, perquisites, and procedural rules that collectively favor incumbents, especially in a polarized environment.
  • The core functions of Congress—lawmaking, representation, and oversight—are exercised under structures (committees, floor procedures, and presidential interactions) that shape policy outcomes and the balance of national vs. local interests.
  • Despite structural and behavioral barriers to rapid large-scale change, Congress maintains a stabilizing role through incremental legislation, district-focused benefits, and accountability mechanisms, even as partisan polarization intensifies.