Socio-anthropological Perspectives of the Self
Socio-anthropological Perspectives of the Self
Marcel Mauss' Moi and Personne
George Herbert Mead and Social Roles
Harry Triandis' Aspects of the Selves
Marcel Mauss' Category of the Mind
self is a complex entity with two distinct, yet interconnected aspects
self is a social and cultural construct that evolved over time
"moi" - the idea of the self
"personne" - the idea of the person
Moi - the idea of 'self'
-refers to our sense of who we are, our basic identity
-The conscious personality that it is plain, particularly to us, that there has never existed a human being who has not been aware, not only of his body, but also at the same time of his individuality, both spiritual and physical.
Personne - the idea of 'person'
-social concepts of what it means to be who we are or what it means to live in a particular institution, family, religion, etc.
-certain number of persons, in reality of 'characters' (personnages)
George Herbert Mead's Theory of the Self
self emerges over time from social experiences and activities such as:
observing and interacting with others,
- responding to others' opinions about oneself, and
internalizing external opinions and internal feelings about oneself
George Herbert Mead's Symbolic Interactionism
I versus Me
Me - the object; attitude taken by the other
i -the subject; self that acts in present time
George Herbert Mead's Developmental Stages
Preparatory or Language Stage
-Imitation - young children imitate others without understanding the social meaning behind their actions
Play Stage
-Pretend play - children play at
being others (like a doctor or teacher) and
understand the difference between
themselves and the roles they play
-Role Playing - process of mentally
assuming perspective of another and
responding from that imagine viewpoint
Game Stage
-Generalized Others - The child understands their role in
relation to all other players.
-Multiple Roles Significant Others
George Herbert Mead's Developmental Stages
Symbols - gestures, objects, and words that form basis of human communication
Harry Triandis' Theory of the Self
the aspects of the self (private, public, collective) are differentially sampled depending on the complexity, level of individualism, and looseness of the culture.
The more complex, individualistic, and loose the culture, the more they sample the private self and vice versa.
Harry Triandis' Aspects of the Self
private self - your perception of your own unique traits, states, and behaviors (e.g.: personal traits, feelings, abilities)
relational self - your cognitions concerning your self within a specific dyadic (one-on-one) relationships (e.g.: self in relation with others such as family members, friends, colleagues)
collective self- your cognitions about your self as a member of a group, such as family or community (e.g.: membership in a religious or social organization)
Individualism vs Collectivism
Individualistic Cultures: Tend to sample the private self more frequently, emphasizing autonomy and unique personal attributes.
Collectivistic Cultures: Give greater emphasis to the public and collective selves, where the self is more interdependent and connected to the social context.
Ingroup vs. Outgroup
• Ingroups – defined by common goals common
fate, presence of an external threat, and/or the
need to distribute resources to all ingroup
members
• Outgroups – consist of people with whom one is
in competition or whom one does not trust.