Tiny House Movement: Focus on sustainable living and accessibility for individuals with disabilities.
Exploration of various narratives and language used around Paralympic athletes.
The establishment and growth of the Paralympics as a significant athletic event for athletes with disabilities.
System used to determine the eligibility of athletes with various disabilities to compete in sports.
Concept that distinguishes between impairment and disability, emphasizing societal barriers over medical conditions.
Examination of how disabilities are represented in media and society, enhancing or damaging perceptions.
Specific insights into the representation of athletes and disabilities during the Rio 2016 Games.
Discourses: Series of statements, narratives, and images that shape understanding around a particular topic.
Multiple discourses can exist simultaneously, creating a dynamic understanding of identities, such as that of a Paralympian.
Key figure in the initiation of the Paralympic movement.
Established spinal cord unit leading to rehabilitation practices for war veterans.
Sport and physical activity pre-Stoke Mandeville: Existing events like the 1888 Sport for the Deaf in Berlin that laid groundwork for future competitions.
CISS: Formation of the International Committee of Sports for the Deaf leading to the Deaflympics.
Stoke Mandeville Games (1948): First event with focus on participation, featuring wheelchair athletes and archery.
Evolution: Addition of more sports and participants in subsequent years.
Rome: 9th International Stoke Mandeville Games with 400 athletes from 23 countries, marking a significant moment in history.
Olympic co-hosting: Held in the same city as the Olympics for the first time.
Shift from participation-focused to elite competition.
Classification importance: Athletes classified by impairment type, including spinal cord injuries, cerebral palsy, amputees, and visual impairments.
Beijing 2008: Featured 3,951 athletes from 146 countries.
2001 changes: “One Bid – One City” rule introduced, integrating Paralympic Games into Olympic bids.
Impact: Uniform organization, marketing, and broadcasting improvements stemmed from this policy.
Separation of impairment (physical limitations) from disability (social exclusion).
Politically effective: Empowers disability rights advocacy.
Instrumentally effective: Enhances participation and policy changes.
Psychologically effective: Boosts the self-esteem of individuals with disabilities.
Neglects impairment significance: Risk of overlooking the physical aspects of disabilities.
Overgeneralization: Assumes universal experiences of oppression among all disabled individuals.
Idealistic: Utopian view may not align with lived realities of individuals.
Historical narratives: Frame disability as an individual challenge rather than a societal one.
“Super Crip” narrative tends to glorify individual overcoming of obstacles at the expense of acknowledging systemic barriers.
Critical influence on public perceptions of disability through selective coverage and imagery.
Supercrip narrative: Language that emphasizes overcoming adversity rather than systemic barriers.
Economic fetishism and inspiration porn: The portrayal of athletes as superhuman ideals that can dehumanize.
Militarized terms: Language framing athletes as defenders and sacrificers of their nations.
Athlete examples: Focus on backgrounds in military service integrated into their sports identity.
Discussions around prosthetics and technology often overshadow individual athlete's stories.
Men portrayed with traditional strength attributes while women are depicted through feminine and eroticized lenses.
Issues ignored in media portrayals, such as inaccessibility and advocacy for disability rights amidst austerity.
The current media narrative often suggests societal acceptance of disabled individuals only through the lens of elite sports.