Introduction to the theory of language
Focus on Bar Theory
Critical questions in language study:
Nature of language
Complexity of language and ability to lie (SC Prevarication)
Nature vs. Nurture in language learning
Behaviorist approach by B.F. Skinner
Human beings viewed as "Tabula Rasa" (blank slate)
Emphasis on social environment in language acquisition
Key components of Behaviorism:
Stimulus: Environmental triggers for language learning
Response: Reactions of children to stimuli
Reinforcement: Feedback from caregivers (positive/negative)
Behaviorism suggests language is influenced by nurture.
Noam Chomsky's critique of Skinner
Published a review of Skinner's "Verbal Behavior"
Key concepts introduced by Chomsky:
Generative Grammar: Framework for understanding language structure
Language as an innate ability, supported by Generative Grammar
Nativist argument:
Children are born with an innate capacity for language (Language Acquisition Device - LAD)
LAD is subject to maturation; critical period for language acquisition
Comparison between language acquisition and physiological development (e.g., human arms)
Children naturally acquire language despite "impoverished data" available in their environment.
Universal characteristics shared among all languages
Theory that all languages stem from a common set of grammatical principles
Innate Language Faculty: Shared human ability to acquire language
Examples:
Children’s language patterns are similar worldwide, indicating underlying structures.
Syntax: Study of sentence structures and constituents
Importance of syntactic competence: Native speakers’ intuitive understanding of grammar
Intuition about grammatical well-formedness (well-formed vs. ill-formed sentences)
Definitions:
A constituent is a word/group of words that function as a single unit in a sentence.
Types of syntactic categories:
Word-level categories (verbs, nouns, etc.)
Phrase-level categories (noun phrases, verb phrases)
Evidence for categories:
Phonological arguments: Word stress patterns indicate category.
Semantic arguments: Meaning can provide insight into category (e.g., action vs. entity).
Understanding constructions and phrases through Transformational Grammar:
Well-formed: Grammatically correct sentences
Ill-formed: Sentences with incorrect structure
X-bar Theory: Framework outlining hierarchical structure of phrases
Illustrates various projections:
Maximal Projection (XP)
Intermediate Projections (X')
Types of syntactic movements:
Transitive verbs often require a direct object to ensure grammaticality.
Preposing: Movement of a phrase to the front for emphasis, illustrating constituency.
C-command: A syntactic relation where one node governs another, crucial for understanding pronoun reference.
Thematic roles assigned to noun phrases (NPs) - Agent, Patient, etc.
Movement to passive forms preserves thematic roles through abstract case assignments.
Example: Active vs. Passive voice structures.
Assigning case roles in sentences:
Nominative Case: Subject role in a sentence
Accusative Case: Object role
Inflectional phrases, comprising functional categories like InFL, are central to clause structure.
Mechanism allowing wh-words to move for interrogative constructions:
Importance of knowing when and how wh- elements transition to the front of sentences.
Wh- features: Establishing relations within CP (Complementizer Phrase).
The study of grammar reveals deeper insights into human cognition and language proficiency.
Understanding these principles fosters appreciation for the complexity and innate capacity for language.