ANTHR 206 LECTURE 14 (EDIT)

TECHNOLOGY PT 1

    • Outline:

      • Goals

      • Typology

      • Manufacturing Process

      • Classification of Materials

      • Classification of Features

      • Approaches

  • Historical Context of Stone Tools and Pottery

    • Stone tools are ancient; evidence of pottery found in the Paleolithic era

    • Pottery was not widely used until later; contexts of good collection needed for widespread use

      • Pottery is more malleable and easier to work with than stone

      • Better preservation qualities compared to stone

  • Textile Preservation

    • Metallurgy links to aspects like exchange, trade, and social dynamics

    • Importance of water technology for load carrying and long-distance travel

  • Indications of Complexity

    • Manufacturing requires advanced skills, serving as evidence of more complex societies

  • Goals

    • Understanding manufacturing/construction processes

    • Use/function of artifacts, features, and ecofacts

    • Impact on groups, communities, and societies

    • Importance of classification in organizing and analyzing data

  • Purpose of Classification

    • Organize data into manageable, meaningful units

    • Define "Types" as basic units of archaeological description

    • Identify relationships between different types

    • Study assemblage variation to separate ranges of variability

    • Ideal types dependent on internal variability of assemblages

  • Understanding Typology

    • Type: A population of artifacts sharing recurring attributes

    • Attribute: A logically irreducible characteristic of an artifact

      • Formal Attributes: Size, shape

      • Technological Attributes: Material, method of manufacture

      • Stylistic Attributes: Color, texture, decoration

  • Kinds of Types in Archaeology

    • Various classifications include:

      • Morphological (descriptive)

      • Functional

      • Temporal ("Time Markers")

      • Stylistic

      • Technological

    • Importance of adjectives when describing types - avoid using "type" alone

  • Morphological Types

    • Based on general form/shape

      • Example: Points used as projectiles

      • Further classifications: Lithic, bone, or stone points

    • Provides minimal information for functional analysis

  • Functional Types

    • Categorized by their intended function

    • Examples include spearheads and arrows

    • Differences in design may cater to specific uses (e.g., large animals, birds, fish)

  • Temporal Types

    • Based on chronological changes in artifacts

      • Categories such as Paleoindian, Protohistoric, Late Prehistoric, and Middle Prehistoric present evolutionary trajectories

  • Stylistic Types

    • Defined by color and surface attributes

    • Examples include various notch styles in projectile points

    • Differences in color and texture affect classification

  • Typology Debate

    • Question: Do we discover types or impose them?

    • Current consensus suggests types are arbitrary impositions rather than reflective of past categorizations by people

    • Our external view is acknowledged as potentially limiting understanding

  • Overview of the Manufacturing Process

    • Steps:

      • Raw material procurement

      • Preparation, shaping (e.g., lithics, ceramics)

    • Detailed cool-down and heating processes essential for different materials

    • Challenges in raw material selection due to environmental exposure

  • Material Classification

    • Two main categories:

      • Unaltered Materials: Stone, bone, antler, etc.

      • Synthetic Materials: Clay pottery, metals with variable distribution

    • Growth of trade and complexity in acquiring quality materials

  • Classification of Features

    • Constructed Features: Dwellings, roads, forts, graves

    • Accumulated Features: Middens, hearths

    • Combined Features: Refuse pits and some hearths indicative of trash accumulation

  • Research Approaches in Archaeology

    • Examination of artifacts, features, and ecofacts through:

      • Archaeological

      • Ethnographic analogy

      • Experimental archaeology

      • Laboratory analyses

  • Archaeological Approach

    • Focus on macroscopic examination:

      • Features such as form, style, spatial distribution, and cultural association

    • More effective than mere maps in cultural inference

  • Ethnographic Analogy Use

    • Criteria for analogies to be valid:

      • Cultural continuity and environmental similarity

    • Recognition of potential for historical inaccuracies through assumptions

    • Importance for analyzing archaeological materials for continuity

  • Experimental Archaeology Techniques

    • Simulations of prehistoric technology and lifestyle

    • Addressing raw material procurement and manufacturing practices

    • Observing usage patterns via marks created on tools

  • Laboratory Analysis Techniques

    • Focused on sourcing of materials and condition assessments

    • Require advanced equipment for understanding manufacturing processes

    • Potential insights through residue analysis and geochemical tracing